Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.dev Karan & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. 08.2019 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus DEV KARAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS $~44 to 47 & 51 * % + MAC.APP. 1034/2018 & CM APPL. 48754/2018 + MAC.APP. 1035/2018 & CM APPL. 48789/2018 + MAC.APP. 1037/2018 & CM APPL. 48799/2018 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus MALA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Versus NATHI RAM & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 1039/2018, CM APPL. 48804/2018 & CM APPL. 48805/2018 ..... Appellant ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant LAL CHAND JHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Versus + MAC.APP. 641/2019 & CM APPL. 28921/2019 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus SUDAMA BHAGAT & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP. Nos.1034, 1035 of 2018 & conn. appeals Page 1 of 4 Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for R-1 & 2 in Item No.44. Mr. Jatinder Kamra, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 in Item No.45. Mr. Vinay Tomar, Adv...
Union of India and Anr vs.d.k. Bose
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~56 * + Date of Decision:08. 08.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.8630/2019 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Central Government Standing Counsel. Versus D.K. BOSE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashim Shidla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.(ORAL) CM No.35671/2019 & 35672/2019. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stands disposed of. W.P.(C) No.8630/2019 & CM No.35670/2019 1. Issue notice. Counsel for the respondent accepts notice. We have heard learned counsels for the parties, perused the record, and we proceed to dispose of the petition at this stage itself. W.P.(C.) No.8630/2019 Page 1 of 5 2. The petitioners have filed the present Writ Petition with the prayer to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 09.05.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribuna...
Surya Pratap Singh & Anr. Vs.state of Karnataka & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1937/2019 Judgment delivered on:07. 08.2019 SURYA PRATAP SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Saleem Ahmed with Ms. Charu Dalal, Mr. Mayank Dawar, Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh and Mr. Amit, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. SI Rakesh Sharma, PS Kalkaji. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek transit bail in FIR No.55/2019 under Sections 4IPC, Uttara Kannada District, Police Station Karwar Town, Karnataka.2. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant along with several other individuals had approached M/s. Overseas Advisors Pvt. Ltd., of whom the petitioners are the Directors, for availing their visa services. BAIL APPLN. 1937/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. It is contended that Rs.80,000/- per head was paid by the complainants an...
Nikhil Babbar vs.state (Nct Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 07, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3899/2019 NIKHIL BABBAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.N. Pandey and Mr. Pushkar Walia, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Manju Singh Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.109/2019 under Sections 354/509/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Geeta Colony, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 3rd August, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Manju Singh, on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CR...
Tullio Giusi Spa vs.house of Trims Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
$~18 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 221/2016 TULLIO GIUSI SPA Through: Ms. Palak Nenwani, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sonal Sinha, Adv. HOUSE OF TRIMS PVT LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER0708.2019 IA No.10754/2019 (of the defendant under Order XIV Rule 5 CPC) 1. The applicant / defendant, after framing of issues on 24th July, 2018 and after partly cross-examining the witness of the plaintiff, seeks amendment of issues by framing of an additional issue qua the authority of the signatory of the plaint to sign and verify the plaint and to institute the suit.2. The counsel for the applicant / defendant has argued, that the said issue was contained in the proposed issues handed over to the Court on 24th July, 2018 but remained to be framed.3. There is no explanation that if the same remained to be framed, why did the counsel for the applicant / defendant not noticed it till the filing of this application and allowed...
Sai Dass Thr. Legal Heirs & Anr. Vs.true Zone Buildwell Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
$~29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :07. 08.2019 O.M.P. 14/2018 & IA77222018 SAI DASS THR. LEGAL HEIRS & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Niraj Singh, Mr.Deepak Jaiswal and Mr.Gautam Kumar, Ms.Jyoti Nagpal, Advs. versus TRUE ZONE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amit Mahajan, Mr.Akshay Ringe, Mr.Siddharth Joshi & Mr.Dhruv Pandey, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. By a separate order passed today in OMP No.11/2018, the petition has been allowed and the Impugned Arbitral Award has been set aside.2. A copy of the order in O.M.P. No.11/2018 is placed below. AUGUST07 2019 RN NAVIN CHAWLA, J OMP No.14/2018 Page 1 $~26 to 40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :07. 08.2019 + O.M.P. 11/2018 & IA69652018 SURENDRA PAL & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Niraj Singh, Mr.Deepak Jaiswal and Ms.Jyoti Nagpal, Mr.Gautam Kumar, Ad...
sh.harpreet Singh & Anr. Vs.true Zone Buildwell Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
$~37 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :07. 08.2019 O.M.P. 13/2019 SH.HARPREET SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Niraj Singh, Mr.Deepak Jaiswal and Mr.Gautam Kumar, Ms.Jyoti Nagpal, Advs. versus TRUE ZONE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amit Mahajan, Mr.Akshay Ringe, Mr.Siddharth Joshi & Mr.Dhruv Pandey, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. By a separate order passed today in OMP No.11/2018, the petition has been allowed and the Impugned Arbitral Award has been set aside.2. A copy of the order in O.M.P. No.11/2018 is placed below. AUGUST07 2019 RN NAVIN CHAWLA, J OMP No.13/2019 Page 1 $~26 to 40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :07. 08.2019 + O.M.P. 11/2018 & IA69652018 SURENDRA PAL & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Niraj Singh, Mr.Deepak Jaiswal and Ms.Jyoti Nagpal, Mr.Gautam Kumar, Advs. versus TRUE ZONE ...
Charan Jeet Singh & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3894/2019 & CRL.M.A. 33018/2019 CHARAN JEET SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Gurpreet Singh, Advocate. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Rajpal. Mr. Suwinder Singh Chadha, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.163/2009, under Sections 420/380/406/498A/120B of IPC, registered at Police Station Punjabi Bagh, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 28th March, 2019 reached between the parties and affidavit of 1st July, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, who is present in Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Rajpal, on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in ...
Ashok Manufacturing Pvt Ltd. Anr vs.atul Nath & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
$~CP-2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07. 08.2019 CO.A(SB) 33/2014 ASHOK MANUFACTURING PVT LTD. ANR..... Appellant ATUL NATH & ORS Through Mr.(name not given), Adv. ..... Respondent versus Through Mr.Saurabh Kalia, Ms.Parika Thakral and Mr.Harshit Aggarwal, Advs. for respondent-1 Mr.Samar bansal, Mr.Manan Sisodia and Mr.Sachin Mishra, Advs. for R-5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) This appeal is filed by the appellant under Section 10F of the 1. Companies Act, 1956 seeking to impugn the order dated 9.5.2014 passed in Company Petition No.119 (ND) of 2012. The company petition had been filed by the respondent under section 397/398/402 and 403 of The Companies Act, 1956 for alleged acts of oppression and mismanagement on the part of the respondents/appellant.2. In the meantime, the intervener/applicant filed the present application CA2562014 seeking a direction to direct the respondent company to disburse the outstanding salary o...
Ifci Factors Ltd vs.innoventive Industries Limited & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h August, 2019. CS(COMM) 88/2016 & IAs No.2562/2017 (of D-3 u/O XXXVII R-5 CPC) & 5625/2017 (of D-2 u/O XXXVII R-5 CPC) IFCI FACTORS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Anupam Srivastava with Ms. Swati Singh, Mr. Dhairya Gupta & Ms. Divya Joshi, Advs. Versus INNOVENTIVE INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ORS ...Defendants Through: Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri with Mr. Shikhil Suri & Ms. Shilpa Saini, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted the suit, under Order XXXVII of the CPC, for recovery of Rs.9,85,46,482.92 paise with pendente lite and future interest jointly and severally from defendants No.1 to 4, namely (i) Innoventive Industries Ltd., (ii) Chandu Chavan, (iii) Ravindra Katre and (iv) Sanjay Waghulade, pleading (a) that the plaintiff is a government undertaking and a non-banking finance company; (b) the defendant no.1 is engaged in the business of manufacture of steel tubes and motor vehicle (MV)...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »