Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mulayam Singh Yadav Medical College & Hospital & Anr. Vs.union of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :26.07.2019 Date of decision:29.08.2019 W.P.(C) 7159/2019 & & CM APPL. 29827/2019 MULAYAM SINGH YADAV MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Bhatia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Utkarsh Jaiswal & Mr. Himanshu Shekhar Tripathi, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for R-1. Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Mr. Tarun Verma, Ms. Michelle, Mr. Abhijit Ms. Arunima & Ms. Sumangla, Advocates for MCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner no.1- Institute seeks the quashing of the impugned order dated 18.05.2019 of the respondent no.2 i.e. the Board of Governors in supersession of the Medical Council of India, whereby the request of the petitioner College for grant of first renewal W.P. (C) 7159/2019 Page 1 of 41 of permission to admit the second batch of fresh 150 students in the ...
State vs.trilok Aggarwal @ Raj & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2019
$~7 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 486/2019 STATE Through Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP ........ Petitioner versus TRILOK AGGARWAL @ Raj & ANR. Through ........ RESPONDENTS None Date of Decision:29. h August, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Present criminal leave petition has been filed on behalf of the State challenging the judgment/order of acquittal dated 31st May, 2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge-07 (POCSO), West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in FIR No.69/2011 under Sections 376(2)(g)/506 IPC registered with Police Station Khyala.2. The Trial Court in the impugned judgment while acquitting respondent-accused has held as under:-"CRL. L.P. 486/2019 Page 1 of 11 42. Thus, in testimonies dated 13.12.2011 and 18.04.2018, the victim deposed that accused Deepanshu accompanied accused Trilok Aggarwal to her house but in her testimony dated 12.02.2018, she has specifically denied p...
Samim & Anr vs.bajaj Alliance Gen Ins Co Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2019
$~17 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAC.APP. 319/2018 Decided on:29. 08.2019 SAMIM & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate. versus BAJAJ ALLIANCE GEN INS CO LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni and Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocates for insurance company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal seeks enhancement of compensation on the ground that the impugned award has erred in : i) not granting 40% towards loss of future prospects and; ii) since the deceased was 25 years of age, multiplier of 18 ought to have been applied instead of 13, in terms of the dicta of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi & Ors. (2017) 16 SCC680 The said contention is, fairly, not disputed by the learned counsel for the insurance company.2. Accordingly, the appellant shall be entitled to relief, in terms of the aforesaid contention.3. The appellants shall also be entitled for compensation towards loss ...
M/S Konark Infra Developers Pvt Ltd & Ors vs.india Affordable Housing ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2019
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 08.2019 LPA2722019 M/S KONARK INFRA DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS Through: Col. Rajnish Soni, Director of the company /Appellant No.2 ..... Appellants versus INDIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING SOCIETY SOLUTIONS (IAHS) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. O.N. Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPL. 18890/2019 This application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 58 days in preferring this appeal. Having heard the Director of the appellant company and looking into the reasons stated in the application, there are reasonable grounds for condonation of delay. We hereby condone the delay of 58 days in preferring this appeal. The application is allowed and disposed of. LPA2722019 1. LPA2902019 Page 1 of 3 This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the order dated 10th Decem...
M/S Kadimi International Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Emaar Mgf Land Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. hAugust 2019. Pronounced on:29. h August 2019. + ARB.P. 485/2019, I.A. 10378/2019, I.A. 10379/2019 M/S KADIMI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Mishra, Mr. Subhankar Sengupta, Mr. Shashwat Tripathi and Mr. Shaleen Srivastva, Advs. versus M/S EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J.ARB.P. 485/2019 1. The present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the Act) challenges appointment of Mr. R.S. Baswana, District and Sessions Judge (Retd.) as the sole arbitrator and further seeks appointment of an independent Arbitrator, in terms of Clause 35 of the Space Buyer Agreement dated 30th December 2008. BRIEF FACTS2... Petitioner- M/s Kadimi International Pvt. Ltd, is a private limited company. Respondent-M/s. Emaar MGF Land Limited, is engaged in the business of real estate.... Petitioner book...
Klj Plasticizers Limited vs.good-health Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h August, 2019 CS(OS) 530/2016 & IA No.10963/2018 (u/O XXXVII R-3(5) CPC) KLJ PLASTICIZERS LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rishi Manchanda & Mr. Arun Kumar, Advs. Versus GOOD-HEALTH AGROTECH PVT. LTD. & ORS. .... Defendants Through: Mr. Kunal Godhwani, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit, under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), for recovery of principal amount of Rs.4 crores together with pre-suit interest of Rs.2.16 crores i.e. total Rs.6.16 crores, jointly and severally from defendant no.1 Good-Health Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. and its directors defendant no.2 Kailash Agarwal and defendant no.3 Subhash Chandra Agarwal.2. It is inter alia the case of the plaintiff, that the plaintiff had disbursed a loan of Rs.4 crores to the defendants, vide Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) on 22nd April, 2013 in the account of the defendant no.1, and the defe...
Prem Chand vs.rambholi Devi @ Ram Bhooli Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2019
$~ 23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"29th August, 2019 RSA392019 & CM Nos. 22009/2019 & 8525/2019 PREM CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Y.S. Panwar, Adv. versus RAMBHOLI DEVI @ RAM BHOOLI DEVI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dwapayan Gupta with Ms. Shikha Goyal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) + 1. The respondent (decree holder) had instituted Civil Suit (7804/2016) against the appellant (judgment debtor) on 05.09.2013 praying for a decree for recovery of possession, arrears of rent and mesne profits (damages) in respect of premises described as a shop on the ground floor of property bearing No.592/22-B, Nakul Gali, Vishwas Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi- 110032 (herein after referred to as suit shop).2. The decree holder claimed and the judgment debtor admitted that she was landlady in respect of the suit shop, he being a tenant therein, the tenancy having been created by a rent deed dated 01.07.2003 which was proved at the trial as Ex. P7. The ca...
Vijay Gupta & Others vs.union of India & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2019
$~A-2 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) 5801/2010 VIJAY GUPTA & OTHERS ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Aruneshwar Gupta, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Varun Dewan and Ms.Shagun Sabharwal, Advs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.T.P.Singh, Sr.Standing Govt.counsel for R-1/UOI Mr.Gurmahar Singh Sistani and Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advs. for DDA Mr.Digvijay Rai and Mr.Aman Yadav, Advs. for R-2,3 and 5 Ms.Deepika, Adv. for R-4/LAC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ or direction to direct respondents to allot plots of land to the petitioners in view of the land acquired pursuant to notification dated 23.12.1986 and 24.12.1986. Essentially the case of the petitioners is for allotment of an alternate land in view of the acquisition of the land situated at village Malikpur Kohi @ Rangpuri, Tehsil...
Md Muslim vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. 08.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 1662/2019 MD MUSLIM ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sulaiman Mohd. Khan, Adv. (DHCLSC) with Mr.MOhit Rastogi, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State. STATE SI Chandar Kumar ST ARS-I/Crime Branch. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present application, the applicant/accused seeks bail in SC No.1324/2016 in pursuance to FIR No.148/2015 registered at Police Station, Crime Branch, Saket Courts for the offences punishable under section 20/of NDPS Act, 1985.2. The facts of the case are that on 28.09.2015 at about 7:35 pm, under Barapulla Flyover, Ring Road, New Delhi, Vehicle No.CG-10X-6620 was intercepted by the police party. Accused Nitesh Ikka, Virender Kumar, Bail Appln.1662/2019 Page 1 of 4 Sanjay Chuahan, and Sharif Khan were found sitting in the vehicle and 180 kg of ganja was recovered. On 03-04.10.2015, accused Nitesh Ikka was t...
Neha Singh vs.rita Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + C.R.P. 258/2017 NEHA SINGH Judgment delivered on:29. 08.2019 versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS RITA SINGH & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Ms.Shilpa V.George, Adv Mr.B.S.Banthia, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.42489/2017... Petitioner seeks condonation of delay of 15 days in filing the petition. It is contended that the case file got misplaced in the office of the counsel for the petitioner on account of certain administrative improvements being done in the office. Subsequently, when the file was discovered the same was filed with the delay of 15 days. There is no serious opposition to the application. Application is allowed. Delay in filing the revision petition is condoned. C.R.P. 258/2017 Page 1 of 5 C.R.P. 258/2017 1. Though office report indicates that respondent No.3 has not been served. Learned counse...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »