Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.lal Chand Jha & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. 08.2019 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus DEV KARAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS $~44 to 47 & 51 * % + MAC.APP. 1034/2018 & CM APPL. 48754/2018 + MAC.APP. 1035/2018 & CM APPL. 48789/2018 + MAC.APP. 1037/2018 & CM APPL. 48799/2018 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus MALA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Versus NATHI RAM & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 1039/2018, CM APPL. 48804/2018 & CM APPL. 48805/2018 ..... Appellant ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant LAL CHAND JHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Versus + MAC.APP. 641/2019 & CM APPL. 28921/2019 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus SUDAMA BHAGAT & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP. Nos.1034, 1035 of 2018 & conn. appeals Page 1 of 4 Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for R-1 & 2 in Item No.44. Mr. Jatinder Kamra, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 in Item No.45. Mr. Vinay Tomar, Adv...
Arun Kumar & Anr. Vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 08, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3909/2019 ARUN KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Jitender Vashisht, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State with SI P.L. Meena. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 33117/2019 (Exemption) CRL.M.A. 33118/2019 (delay in re-filing) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. There is delay of 147 days in re-filing the accompanying petition. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the delay is condoned. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3909/2019 Quashing of FIR No.813/2018, under Sections 324/341/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Aman Vihar, now Police Station Prem Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 29th May, 2019 of Crl.M.C. 3909/2019 Page 1 of 3 respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderst...
Dinesh Singh Panwar vs.state n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~ * % + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: ____ 26th July, 2019 Judgment Pronounced on:8. August, 2019 CRL.A. 782/2001 DINESH SINGH PANWAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.B. Andley, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohd Shamik, Mr. Anurag K. Andley and Mr. Kshitij Arora, Advocates STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CRL.A. 788/2001 DIWAKAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ravinder Narayan and Mr. Raghav Narayan, Advocates STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CRL.A. 793/2001 NARENDER AGARWAL ..... Appellant STATE OF DELHI Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CRL.A. 812/2001 SUNIL ..... Appellant STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) CORAM: Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Crl.A.782/2001 etc. Page 1 of 34 G.S.SISTANI, ...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.neelam & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. 08.2019 MAC.APP. 269/2019 & CM No.8255/2019 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. D. K. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Appellant $~48 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. NEELAM & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S. N. Parashar, Advocate. The award of compensation passed by the learned Tribunal on 22.12.2018 has been impugned by the insurance company on the ground that minimum wages ought to have been taken as Rs.13,350/- instead of Rs.16,858/- and, therefore, the order is erroneous and ought to be set aside. The Courts attention is drawn to the minimum wages applicable in Delhi as on the date of the accident i.e. 09.07.2018. The minimum wages applicable in Delhi with effect from 03.03.2017 for a matriculate were Rs.16,182/- and DA was revised at the rate of Rs.286/- and Rs.390/- with effect from 01.04.2017 and 01.04.2018 respectively. Accordingly, the minimum wages applicable would b...
Sunil Gupta vs.joint Director Enforcement Directorate, Government of I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~ 11 to 13 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 793/2019 Decided on:-"8th August, 2019 RAJINDER SINGH DUGGAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ajmani, Adv. versus JOINT DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC/UOI with Mr. Arjun Dev, Advocate + CRL.A. 794/2019 SUNIL GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ajmani, Adv. versus JOINT DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC/UOI with Mr. Arjun Dev, Advocate + CRL.A. 795/2019 VISHAL ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ajmani, Adv. Crl. M.C. No.793/2019,794/2019 & 795/2019 Page 1 of 4 versus JOINT DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC/UOI with Mr. Arjun Dev, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) By order in original dated 30.03.2017, the adjudicating authority under the Foreign...
Ashok Chawla & Ors. Vs.c.b.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: July 12, 2019 Decided on: August 08, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 4120/2016 ASHOK CHAWLA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kunal Malhotra, Advocate with Ms. Palak Kharbanda, & Mr. Vivek, Advocates. C.B.I. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special P.P. with Mr. K.P. Sharma, Deputy SP, CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT1 Some confusion prevails concerning the procedure governing the criminal cases involving accusations of offences under the Official Secrets Act, 1923 (the Official Secrets Act), certain notifications issued by the central government, some observations in an earlier judgment of a single bench of this court, and a seemingly unreasonable posture adopted by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the case from which the present petition arises, having possibly added to the causes. The petition at hand presents the opportunity for such confusion to be dispelled and clarity in the approach expect...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.nathi Ram & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. 08.2019 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus DEV KARAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS $~44 to 47 & 51 * % + MAC.APP. 1034/2018 & CM APPL. 48754/2018 + MAC.APP. 1035/2018 & CM APPL. 48789/2018 + MAC.APP. 1037/2018 & CM APPL. 48799/2018 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus MALA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Versus NATHI RAM & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 1039/2018, CM APPL. 48804/2018 & CM APPL. 48805/2018 ..... Appellant ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant LAL CHAND JHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Versus + MAC.APP. 641/2019 & CM APPL. 28921/2019 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus SUDAMA BHAGAT & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP. Nos.1034, 1035 of 2018 & conn. appeals Page 1 of 4 Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for R-1 & 2 in Item No.44. Mr. Jatinder Kamra, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 in Item No.45. Mr. Vinay Tomar, Adv...
Mahinder & Anr vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 549/2015 Reserved on :22. 07.2019 Date of Decision :08. 08.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: MAHINDER & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma and Mr. Mahinder Pratap Singh, Advocates for appellant No.1 Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra, Advocate for appellant No.2 versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 The present proceedings are instituted challenging the judgment of conviction dated 19.12.2014, passed by ASJ-01(West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi arising out of SC No.in FIR No.registered under Sections 363/368/342/376 (G) IPC at P.S. Hari Nagar, Delhi whereby the appellants were convicted for an offence punishable under Section 376 (2) (g) IPC and vide order on sentence dated 22.12.2014, the appellants were directed to undergo RI for ten years each with a fine of Rs.5,000/- each, in default of which, the appellants were directed to undergo SI for a further pe...
Ajay Verma & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 08, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1509/2019 & Crl.M.A. 5980/2019 AJAY VERMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Hem C. Vashisht, Advocate with petitioners in person. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Indu. Ms.Neetu Rai, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.81/2016, under Section 498-A/4of IPC, registered Police Station Sagarpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 4th August, 2016. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Indu on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute Crl.M.C. 1509/201...
Rakesh Jain vs.atul Bansal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h August, 2019. CS(OS) 89/2018 & IA No.2805/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) RAKESH JAIN ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Divakar Kumar and Mr. A.K. Bajpai, Advs. ..... Defendants Versus ATUL BANSAL & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Through: None. The plaintiff, Rakesh Jain has instituted this suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs.6,75,06,667/- with pendente lite and future interest and costs, jointly and severally from (i) Atul Bansal, (ii) ABW Infrastructure Limited, (iii) Ved Prakash Saxena, (iv) Ravi Shanker and (v) Aditya Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.2. The suit came up first before this Court on 27th February, 2018 when summons thereof ordered to be issued and the defendant No.2 ABW Infrastructure Limited directed to maintain status-quo with respect to possession and title of land admeasuring 62 Kanals and 13 Marlas in Village Nangli Umarpur, Gurgaon, Haryana.3. The or...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »