Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Umakant & Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~22 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C. 2092/2019 Decided on:-"8th August, 2019 UMAKANT & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anju Garg, Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Ranbir Singh, PS Nangloi. Ms. Anubha Sharma, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu Rites and Ceremonies on 18.04.2008. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) No.107/2014 having been registered on 19.02.2014 by police station Nangloi, on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first petitioner), his brothers (seco...
Sdirmaxo Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:8. h August, 2019 % + W.P.(C) 11828/2018 SDIRMAXO CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CORAM: Through Mr. Aniruddha Joshi, Mr. Pramod B. versus Agarwala, Mr. Anuj P. Agarwala & Mr. Aayush Agarwala, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Sanchit Dhawan, Adv. for R-3. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.... Petitioner inter-alia has prayed for quashing the impugned letter dated 05.10.2018 issued by respondent no.2 by which the tender invited in the month of April, 2017 has been scrapped. It has also been prayed that the respondent be directed to finalise the tender with the petitioner. A direction is also sought to respondents no.1 and 2, not to advertise a fresh tender.2. The facts as they unfold show a very sorry state of affairs in the man...
Harjeet Kaur Baweja @ Dr. Rani Phlaphongphanich vs.ravinder Pal Singh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 202/2019 HARJEET KAUR BAWEJA @ DR. RANI PHLAPHONGPHANICH RAVINDER PAL SINGH BAWEJA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: Mr. Sankalp Kohli, Adv. Through: None. Versus ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendants ORDER0808.2019 % IA No.10805/2019 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. IA No.10804/2019 (of plaintiff for refund of court fees) 3. A practise has grown in certain section of the bar, of not doing all that is required to be done on the scheduled date of hearing and to subsequently file application/s, seeking reliefs which ought to have been claimed or what ought to have been done, on the scheduled date and to so multiply applications and hearings.4. The request for refund of court fees, making which this application is filed, ought to have been made on 11th April, 2019, when the suit was withdrawn. There is no explanation, why the said relief was not sought on...
Mukesh Mann vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 08.2019 CRL.REV.P. 869/2017 & Crl.M.A.19026/2017 MUKESH MANN versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Ms.Vagisha Kochar,Adv. Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP with ASI Ramesh, P.S.Alipur. Mr.Abhay Kumar, Adv.for R-2. Mr.Amit Singh, AR for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioner impugns order dated 23.09.2017 whereby charge has been framed against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Electricity Act, 2003. As per the complaint lodged by respondent No.2 theft of electricity was found in the premises of the petitioner whereby a wire was connected directly to the public pole outside the shop of the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had rented out the shop to a tenant in the year 2002-2003 and on account of non- ...
Rajinder Singh Duggal vs.joint Director Enforcement Directorate, Gover ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~ 11 to 13 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 793/2019 Decided on:-"8th August, 2019 RAJINDER SINGH DUGGAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ajmani, Adv. versus JOINT DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC/UOI with Mr. Arjun Dev, Advocate + CRL.A. 794/2019 SUNIL GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ajmani, Adv. versus JOINT DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC/UOI with Mr. Arjun Dev, Advocate + CRL.A. 795/2019 VISHAL ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ajmani, Adv. Crl. M.C. No.793/2019,794/2019 & 795/2019 Page 1 of 4 versus JOINT DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC/UOI with Mr. Arjun Dev, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) By order in original dated 30.03.2017, the adjudicating authority under the Foreign...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.mala Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. 08.2019 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus DEV KARAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS $~44 to 47 & 51 * % + MAC.APP. 1034/2018 & CM APPL. 48754/2018 + MAC.APP. 1035/2018 & CM APPL. 48789/2018 + MAC.APP. 1037/2018 & CM APPL. 48799/2018 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus MALA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Versus NATHI RAM & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 1039/2018, CM APPL. 48804/2018 & CM APPL. 48805/2018 ..... Appellant ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant LAL CHAND JHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Versus + MAC.APP. 641/2019 & CM APPL. 28921/2019 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus SUDAMA BHAGAT & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP. Nos.1034, 1035 of 2018 & conn. appeals Page 1 of 4 Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for R-1 & 2 in Item No.44. Mr. Jatinder Kamra, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 in Item No.45. Mr. Vinay Tomar, Adv...
Diwakar Gupta vs.state n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~ * % + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: ____ 26th July, 2019 Judgment Pronounced on:8. August, 2019 CRL.A. 782/2001 DINESH SINGH PANWAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.B. Andley, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohd Shamik, Mr. Anurag K. Andley and Mr. Kshitij Arora, Advocates STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CRL.A. 788/2001 DIWAKAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ravinder Narayan and Mr. Raghav Narayan, Advocates STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CRL.A. 793/2001 NARENDER AGARWAL ..... Appellant STATE OF DELHI Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CRL.A. 812/2001 SUNIL ..... Appellant STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) CORAM: Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Crl.A.782/2001 etc. Page 1 of 34 G.S.SISTANI, ...
Anil vs.state (n.c.t of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 08, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3913/2019 & Crl.M.A. 33132/2019 ANIL Through: Mr. H.Singh, Advocate for .....Petitioner Mr.Abhishek Kashyap, Advocate. Versus STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- No.1-State with SI Subhash Chand. Ms. Vandana Singh, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.56/2019, under Section 3of IPC, registered at Police Station Gokulpuri, Delhi is sought on the of Compromise Deed of 3rd August, 2019 (Annexure-B) reached between the parties and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and he has been iden...
Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Singh & Anr vs.zakir Husain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"08.08.2019 RFA5712019 & C.M. No.28506/2019 VINOD KUMAR @ VINOD SINGH & ANR Through Mr.N.K.Sahoo, Adv. ..... Appellants versus ZAKIR HUSAIN ..... Respondent Through Mr.Priyank Sharma, Adv with Mr.K.S.Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. This regular first appeal under section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) assails the judgment and decree dated 11.04.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Shahadara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in C.S.No.891/2017, whereby the respondents/plaintiffs suit for possession was decreed under order XII rule 6 CPC on an admission made by the appellant/defendant.2. The brief facts as emerge from the record are that the respondents predecessors/original plaintiffs namely, Shakra Begum and Ravia, claimed to have purchased the property bearing No.49 in Khasra No.27/20, village Khureji Khas along with the superstructure thereof (sui...
Vishal Arora vs.joint Director Enforcement Directorate, Government of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~ 11 to 13 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 793/2019 Decided on:-"8th August, 2019 RAJINDER SINGH DUGGAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ajmani, Adv. versus JOINT DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC/UOI with Mr. Arjun Dev, Advocate + CRL.A. 794/2019 SUNIL GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ajmani, Adv. versus JOINT DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC/UOI with Mr. Arjun Dev, Advocate + CRL.A. 795/2019 VISHAL ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ajmani, Adv. Crl. M.C. No.793/2019,794/2019 & 795/2019 Page 1 of 4 versus JOINT DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC/UOI with Mr. Arjun Dev, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) By order in original dated 30.03.2017, the adjudicating authority under the Foreign...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »