Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.sudama Bhagat & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. 08.2019 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus DEV KARAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS $~44 to 47 & 51 * % + MAC.APP. 1034/2018 & CM APPL. 48754/2018 + MAC.APP. 1035/2018 & CM APPL. 48789/2018 + MAC.APP. 1037/2018 & CM APPL. 48799/2018 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus MALA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Versus NATHI RAM & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 1039/2018, CM APPL. 48804/2018 & CM APPL. 48805/2018 ..... Appellant ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant LAL CHAND JHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Versus + MAC.APP. 641/2019 & CM APPL. 28921/2019 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus SUDAMA BHAGAT & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP. Nos.1034, 1035 of 2018 & conn. appeals Page 1 of 4 Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for R-1 & 2 in Item No.44. Mr. Jatinder Kamra, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 in Item No.45. Mr. Vinay Tomar, Adv...
Sanjeev Chanana vs.sandeep Chaudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 08, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 424/2018 SANJEEV CHANANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Upadhyay, Advocate Versus SANDEEP CHAUDHARY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kishan Nautiyal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 trial court vide judgment of 3rd February, 2017 has held petitioner guilty for the dishonour of four cheques of 10,00,000/- each. Vide order of 1st April, 2017, trial court has sentenced petitioner to simple imprisonment of one year and fine of 62,50,000/- with default clause. Out of the fine imposed, amount of 62,00,000/- is to be paid to respondent-complainant and 50,000/- is to be deposited in the Prime Minister National Relief Fund. Appellate Court vide impugned judgment of 27th April, 2018 has upheld petitioners conviction and sentence. The facts noticed by the Appellate Court in the judgment of 27th April, 2018 are as un...
Astrazeneca Ab & Ors vs.p Kumar & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~J * % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:08. 08.2019. IAs.3986/2018 & 5096/2018 in CS(COMM) 749/2018 ASTRAZENECA AB & ORS P KUMAR & ANR versus IA No.4771/2018 in CS(COMM) 792/2018 ASTRAZENECA AB & ANR T RAO & ANR versus ..... Plaintiffs ..... Defendants ..... Plaintiffs ..... Defendants IA No.9332/2018 in CS(COMM) 1023/2018 ASTRA ZENECA AB & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs versus ..... Defendant DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED Present: Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms.Archana Shankar, Mr.Devinder Rawat, Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Sanchith Shivakumar, Advs. for the plaintiffs. Mr.J.Sai Deepak and Mr.G.Nataraj, Advs. for the defendant in CS(COMM) 749/2018 Mr.C.M.Lall, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Rajeshwari, Adv. for the defendant in CS(COMM) 792/2018. Mr.Sai Krishan, Adv. and Ms.Gitanjali Mathew, Adv. for the defendant in CS(COMM) 1023/2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IAs.3986/2018 & 5096/2018 in CS(COMM) 749/2018 IA No.4771/2018 in CS(COMM) 792/2018 CS(COMM.)749/2018 & e...
Sunil vs.state (n.c.t. Of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~ * % + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: ____ 26th July, 2019 Judgment Pronounced on:8. August, 2019 CRL.A. 782/2001 DINESH SINGH PANWAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.B. Andley, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohd Shamik, Mr. Anurag K. Andley and Mr. Kshitij Arora, Advocates STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CRL.A. 788/2001 DIWAKAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ravinder Narayan and Mr. Raghav Narayan, Advocates STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CRL.A. 793/2001 NARENDER AGARWAL ..... Appellant STATE OF DELHI Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CRL.A. 812/2001 SUNIL ..... Appellant STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) CORAM: Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Crl.A.782/2001 etc. Page 1 of 34 G.S.SISTANI, ...
Ntpc vs.wpil
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :08. 08.2019 OMP(COMM) 98/2017 NTPC WPIL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Bharat Sangal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ashim Vachher, Ms.Babita Kushwaha, Ms.Laimon Rani Boro, Mr.Vaibhav Dabas, Advs. alongwith Ms.Preeti Bhardwaj, Law Officer. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.T.K.Ganju, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Munindra Dvivedi, Ms.Divya Bhalla, Ms.Aathira Pillai, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) This petition under Section 34 of 1. the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 25.07.2015 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Contract Agreements dated 30.06.2005 executed between the parties for the CW System Package for Sipat Super Thermal Power Project Stage -I OMP(COMM) No.98/2017 Page 1 (3 X660MW) COA NO.:CS-9518-133-2-FC-COA-4...
Bhim Sain (Since Deceased) Thr Lrs & Ors vs.mohinder Kumar (Since Dece ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on:08. h August, 2019 RSA1342016, CM APPL No.18557/2016 BHIM SAIN (SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS & ORS Through : Mr.Rohan Dewan, Adv. ..... Appellants versus MOHINDER KUMAR (SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS & ORS Through : Mr.K.Venkatraman ........ RESPONDENTS and Mr.D.K.Chawla, Advs. for R-1(B) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment passed in RCA No.8/2013 dated 19.12.2015. The appeal was dismissed while upholding the judgment dated 22.05.2013 passed in Civil Suit No.1412/2011.2. The dispute is qua house property bearing No.4-E/164, Amar Colony, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi. This property was in the name of Late Roop Chand s/o Shri Roop Lal, resident of Multan District in Pakistan.2. It was alleged by the appellants that Roop Chand migrated to India and had married twice during his lifetime. From his first wife, he has one son Bhim Sain (since deceased - the appellant herein) and from h...
Sonu Kumar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~4 * + Date of Decision:08. 08.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.8432/2019 SONU KUMAR Through: Mr.Girijesh Pandey, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) No.841. Issue notice. Counsel for the respondents accepts notice. We have heard learned counsels for the parties, perused the record, and we proceed to dispose of the petition at this stage itself.2. The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the prayer to issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ or direction to set aside order dated 22.10.2018 passed by respondent No.2, and to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction to set aside order dated 13.06.2018 passed by the respondent No.3.3. The relevant facts of the case are that the petitioner-who was a Constable of 0-8 Bn...
Dheeraj Kumar vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 08.2019 BAIL APPLN. 3051/2018 DHEERAJ KUMAR versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Ms. Ayesha Jamal, Adv. Mr. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Devender Singh, P.S.Govind Puri. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.689/2016 under Sections 420/5IPC, Police Station Govind Puri.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant and his friends were approached by the petitioner and his associates for securing a job in Railways. It is alleged that approximately Rs.6 lakhs had been paid, however, no job got secured.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. He submits that apart from just naming the petitioner in the FIR, there is no allega...
Oshihama vs.delhi Police
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~10 * + W.P.(CRL) 1406/2019 OSHIHAMA Through: Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate with ........ Petitioner petitioner in person versus DELHI POLICE Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON ORDER0808.2019 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia % 1. for grant of full custody of her minor daughter aged about eleven years, who is presently in the custody of her father and for registration of an FIR under the POCSO Act, against her husband for abusing their minor daughter.2. The petitioner is represented by Ms. Aishwarya Rao, learned counsel, assigned to her by the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee to appear on her behalf. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner and her husband were married in November, 2003 and have been blessed with a daughter. It appears from the record that the father of the child and husband of the petitioner had app...
Chattrapal Singh Lodha & Ors. Vs.state of Nct
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 08.2019 CRL.REV.P. 732/2017 CHATTRAPAL SINGH LODHA & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE OF NCT Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : ..... Respondent Mr. Garvesh Kabra with Mr. Prakhar Srivastava and Ms. Pooja Kabra, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. ACP Anil Dureja, PS Crime Branch. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 732/2017 & Crl.M.A.16099/2017 (stay) 1.2. Status report is filed. Same is taken on record.... Petitioners impugn order on charge dated 10.08.2017, whereby, charges have been framed against the petitioners under Section 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read with Section 120B Indian Penal Code.3. The only challenge raised by learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners are liable to be discharged as the audio-video CDs CRL.REV.P.732/2017 Page 1...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »