Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Subhash Chand Garg & Anr. Vs.shri Roshan Seth & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h August, 2019 + CS(OS) 77/2019 SHRI SUBHASH CHAND GARG & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate (M- 9717134040) versus SHRI ROSHAN SETH & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Saurabh Chouhan & Mr. Varun (M- for D-3 Jain, Advocates 9810104127) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present suit for recovery of sum of Rs.2,28,65,000/- has been filed by the Plaintiffs against Defendants No.1 to 4. Defendant No.3 lays claim to the First Floor of the property bearing no.C-3/201, Janak Puri, New Delhi-110058 (hereinafter suit property) on the basis of a registered Sale deed.2. The case of the Plaintiffs is that the Plaintiffs who were looking to buy a property had explored purchase of the suit property. Defendants No.1 and 2 represented themselves as the owners of the property. After negotiations, two agreements to sell dated 4th February, 2016 and 18th March, 2016 were entered int...
Harpal Singh & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 09, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3937/2019 & CRL.M.As. 33224-33225/2019 HARPAL SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Robin Singh Sirohi & Mr. Parameshwar Choudhary, Advocates. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Rajender Singh. Mr. Rajendra Singh & Ms. Nitisha Goyal, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.607/2017, under Sections 3of IPC, registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 6th August, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, who is present in Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and he has been identified to b...
Bata India Limited vs.avs International Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~42 & 43 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 402/2019, I.A. 10589/2019 BATA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Adv. versus AVS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 201/2019 Through: Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv. ..... Respondent BATA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Adv. versus AVS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % SANJEEV NARULA, J.ORDER0908.2019 Through: Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS ARB.P. 402/2019 1. By way of the present petition under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the A&C Act), the... Petitioner prays that the parties be referred to arbitration under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties. ARB.P. 402/2019 & O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 201/2019 Page 1 of 24 Brief Facts:2.... Petitioner (BATA India Ltd.), is a company manufacturing footwear. ...
Narender Agarwal vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~ * % + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: ____ 26th July, 2019 Judgment Pronounced on:8. August, 2019 CRL.A. 782/2001 DINESH SINGH PANWAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.B. Andley, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohd Shamik, Mr. Anurag K. Andley and Mr. Kshitij Arora, Advocates STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CRL.A. 788/2001 DIWAKAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ravinder Narayan and Mr. Raghav Narayan, Advocates STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CRL.A. 793/2001 NARENDER AGARWAL ..... Appellant STATE OF DELHI Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP CRL.A. 812/2001 SUNIL ..... Appellant STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) CORAM: Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Crl.A.782/2001 etc. Page 1 of 34 G.S.SISTANI, ...
Union of India and Ors. Vs.manoj Kumar Gautam
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~2. * + % W.P.(C) 8115/2019 and C.M. No.33675/2019 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Date of Decision:08. 08.2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC and Ms.Mahima Bahl, Advocate. versus MANOJ KUMAR GAUTAM ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Ms. Anupama Sharma & Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The Union of India has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 16.11.2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in O.A. No.3252/2017. By the impugned order the Tribunal has allowed the Original Application preferred by the respondent and direct that he be promoted since he has been found fit by the DPC in its recommendations dated 07.06.2017. The respondents promotion has been granted with effect from the date when his juniors were so promoted. It is directed that he shall retain his seniority....
Bakhtawar Lal Nagpal & Anr vs.prabhu Mahto & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~4 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. h August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 14301-14302/2005 & CM APPL.11598/2019, 30829/2019 BAKHTAWAR LAL NAGPAL & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.B.L. Chawla, Advocate along with petitioner No.2 in person versus PRABHU MAHTO & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Akarsh Bhalla, Advocate along with respondent No.1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the award dated 12th February, 2004 1. passed by the Labour Court whereby the Labour Court has granted reinstatement with 50% back wages to the respondent.2. The respondent was working with the petitioner as a driver. The petitioner terminated the respondent on 17th June, 1993 on account of his alleged involvement in a serious crime against the petitioner in respect of which the FIR was lodged with the police.3. The respondent raised an industrial dispute which was referred to the Labour Court. The Labour Court held the termi...
Hira Lal & Ors vs.m/s Ahlcon Public School
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~ 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:08. h August,2019 + LPA5962016 HIRA LAL & ORS ..... Appellants Through Mr. S. Mehdi Imam, Advocate versus M/S AHLCON PUBLIC SCHOOL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 24.11.2015 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court. It may be noticed that there was an initial labour dispute between 24 employees and the School, which was pressed by only 20 employees. The Award rendered by the Labour Court was assailed by the workmen. The employees of the School(hereinafter referred to as the workmen) filed a complaint on 19.12.2002 before the Assistant Labour Commissioner seeking a relief of payment of minimum wages through the union. The services of the workmen were terminated by the Management on 03.04.2003, resultantly a legal notice was issued by the workmen...
Sandeep vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 08.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2913/2018 SANDEEP THE STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Vikas Bhardwaj, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Kuldeep, P.S.Paschim Vihar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.605/2018 under Section 381 IPC, Police Station Paschim Vihar.2. Allegations against the petitioner are that petitioner was employed to take care of 18 telecom towers of the service provider to telecom companies. He is alleged to have last attended his office on 14.10.2018. Thereafter when inspection was carried out of the said towers after 2-3 days, it transpired that several battery equipment as well as telecom equipment was missing. Complaint was lodged and the FIR was registered. BAIL APPLN. 2913/2018 Page ...
Mcd vs.anil Gupta and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
O.M.P. 709/2011 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Goel, Standing Counsel with Ms. Supreet Bimbra and Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocates with Mr. K. S. Maan, EE and Mr. Vimal Bhandari, AE. (M:98102. 5488) versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa and Mr. Aditya (M: Advocates. Chhibber, 9810233548) ANIL GUPTA AND ORS. $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h July, 2019 Date of decision:8. h August, 2019 + MCD CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT I.A. 2364/2019 (modification of order dt. 12.12.2018) in O.M.P. 709/2011 1. The present OMP was disposed of vide judgment dated 12th December, 2018. However, an application was filed by the... Petitioner through the Standing Counsel for the North Delhi Municipal Corporation, the successor to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (hereinafter, jointly referred to as Corporation) seeking recall and modification.2. The case arose out of a construction contract for the zonal building of the Corpo...
Deepak Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2019
$~23 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2157/2019 Decided on:-"8th August, 2019 DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Sahu, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sachdeva, APP for the State with SI Prateek Saexna, PS Jaitpur. Mr. V.P. Sharma, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu Rites and Ceremonies on 28.01.2014. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) No.128/2016 having been registered on 08.03.2016 by police station Jaitpur, Delhi on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first petitioner), her father-in-law (sec...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »