Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tirlochan Singh & Anr vs.state (Govt. Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 09, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3918/2019 & CRL.M.A. 33167/2019 TIRLOCHAN SINGH & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ojasvi Khaneja, Advocate. Versus STATE (GOVT. NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Inspector C.L. Meena. Mr. C.B. Garg, Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. + CRL.M.C. 3919/2019 & CRL.M.A. 33168/2019 RATVINDER SINGH & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. C.B. Garg, Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates. Versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Inspector C.L. Meena. Mr. Ojasvi Khaneja, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CRL.M.C. 3918/2019 & 3919/2019 Page 1 of 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIR Nos. 730/2014 under Sections 323/354(B)/34 of IPC and FIR No.729/2014 under Sections 323/354(B)/506/...
Bata India Limited vs.avs International Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~42 & 43 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 402/2019, I.A. 10589/2019 BATA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Adv. versus AVS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 201/2019 Through: Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv. ..... Respondent BATA INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Adv. versus AVS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % SANJEEV NARULA, J.ORDER0908.2019 Through: Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS ARB.P. 402/2019 1. By way of the present petition under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the A&C Act), the... Petitioner prays that the parties be referred to arbitration under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties. ARB.P. 402/2019 & O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 201/2019 Page 1 of 24 Brief Facts:2.... Petitioner (BATA India Ltd.), is a company manufacturing footwear. ...
Ms. S vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 09, 2019 % W.P.(CRL.) 2220/2019 MS. S ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sougat Mishra, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for Mr.Rahul Mehra, SC (Crl.). SI Neelam, PS Timar Pur, North Distt. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 33246/2019 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(CRL) 2220/2019 & CRL.M.A. 33245/2019 By the instant petition, the petitioner seeks to invoke the extra- ordinary jurisdiction of the Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the orders dated 17.12.2018 passed by the ld. MM dismissing the complaint filed by the petitioner under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and the W.P.(CRL.) 2220/2019 Page 1 of 5 other order dated 09.04.2019, whereby, the revision preferred against order passed by the ld. MM was dismissed by the ld. Additional Sessions Judge. Concisely, the relevant facts are tha...
Haji Mohd. Saeed Qureshi and Ors vs.delhi Development Authority and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~77 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8663/2019 and CM APPL. 35752/2019 HAJI MOHD. SAEED QURESHI AND ORS......... Petitioners Through: Mr Puneet Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr Mohit Kumar, Advocate along with P- 1, 3 & 4. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sanjay Singh, Advocate for R-1/DDA. Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel for DAMB with Mr Nitesh Kumar Singh and Ms. L. Arora, Advocates for R- 2/DAMB. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER0908.2019 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying 1. that the decision of the Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board (respondent No.2 DAMB) dated 28.03.2018 be quashed inasmuch as, it contemplates the allotment of shops by way of an e-auction. Further, the petitioners pray that this Court hold that the petitioners are W.P.(C) 8663/2019 Page 1 of 8 eligible for the allotment of shops in the market in question and thereby, direct the respo...
Jai Kishan @ Jony & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~14 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C. 2131/2019 Decided on:-"9th August, 2019 JAI KISHAN @ JONY & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: versus Mr. Pawan Sharma, Adv. THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State. Mr. Bhupesh Narula & Mr. Rinku Narula, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu Rites and Ceremonies on 03.06.2011. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) No.209/2012 having been registered on 24.06.2012 by police station Mukherjee Nagar, on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first petitioner), his mother (second petitioner) and his sister (third petitio...
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central-3 vs.m/s. Dreamcity Buildwe ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA11522017 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-3 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Sr. Standing Counsel. $~5 * + versus CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH M/S. DREAMCITY BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal with Mr.Madhur Aggarwal and Mr.Uma Shankar, Advocates. % ORDER0908.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 30th January, 2017 passed by the ITAT in ITA No.4766/Del/2009 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2005-06.2. The question sought to be urged by the Revenue is whether the ITAT erred in deleting the addition of Rs.2.12 crores made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) adopting a restrictive and pedantic interpretation of the scope of assessment under Section 143 (3) read with ITA11522017 Page 1 of 11 Section 153C of the Act?.3. The background facts are that...
Jai Prakash Singh vs.m/s Saraswati Trading Company
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~14 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5847/2016 JAI PRAKASH SINGH Through: Date of Decision:09. h August, 2019 ........ Petitioner In person Mr.Pankaj Anil Arora, Advocate as amicus curiae.1. versus M/S SARASWATI TRADING COMPANY ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby compensation of Rs.40,000/- has been awarded to the petitioner. The petitioner is seeking enhancement of compensation.2. The petitioner worked with the respondent as a Gate Keeper for about one year and his services were terminated in the year 2000. The Labour Court awarded compensation of Rs.40,000/- along with interest @ 9% per annum.3. The petitioner present in person seeks enhancement of compensation to the tune of Rs.8,50,000/-.4. There is no appearance on behalf of the respondent despite the matter W.P.(C) 5847/2016 Page 1 of 2 having been passed over once.5. Mr.Pankaj Anil Arora, lea...
Ratvinder Singh & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 09, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3918/2019 & CRL.M.A. 33167/2019 TIRLOCHAN SINGH & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ojasvi Khaneja, Advocate. Versus STATE (GOVT. NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Inspector C.L. Meena. Mr. C.B. Garg, Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. + CRL.M.C. 3919/2019 & CRL.M.A. 33168/2019 RATVINDER SINGH & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. C.B. Garg, Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates. Versus THE STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Inspector C.L. Meena. Mr. Ojasvi Khaneja, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CRL.M.C. 3918/2019 & 3919/2019 Page 1 of 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIR Nos. 730/2014 under Sections 323/354(B)/34 of IPC and FIR No.729/2014 under Sections 323/354(B)/506/...
Deepak Khosla vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2019 CRL.M.C. 2994/2016 DEEPAK KHOSLA ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner :... Petitioner in person with Ms. Himani Kaushik, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State Mr. Maninder Singh with Mr. Anand M. Mishra, Advocates for respondent Nos.2 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.32362/2019/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2994/2016 & Crl.M.A.32361/2019 (for urgent disposal of the petition) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 23.07.2016 in CC No.6(old number) and 5119(new number) titled Deepak Khosla vs. Vikram Bakshi & Ors. CRL.M.C.2994/2016 Page 1 of 6 2. By the impugned order the complaint filed by the petitioner was dismissed on two counts, firstly on the ground that no document w...
Prabha Chawla & Anr. Vs.air Force Bal Niketan (Aided) School & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:09. h August,2019 LPA1792018 PRABHA CHAWLA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through Mr.Gurbaksh Singh, Advocate. versus AIR FORCE BAL NIKETAN (AIDED) SCHOOL & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS * % + Through Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Advocate for R-1. Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitesh Singh and Ms. Laveena Arora, Advocates for R-2/DOE. Mrs.Archana Gaur, OSD (Lit.), Zone 23. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 08.03.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, by which a petition filed by the appellants herein stands dismissed.2. The appellants no.1 and 2 had joined the services of respondent no.1/school as primary teachers on 11.09.2011 and 11.09.2012 respectively on ad hoc basis. The services of both the appellants were extended every year till May, 2017. On 02.05.2017, the appellants...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »