Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vikas Aggarwal vs.tripurari Mani Tripathi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~ 8 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 625/2019 VIKAS AGGARWAL Decided on:-"9th August, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Surendra N. Mittal, Advocate versus TRIPURARI MANI TRIPATHI Through: Mr. Irfan Khan, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) The petitioner had instituted a criminal complaint case (CC No.18672/2016) against the respondent (accused) alleging commission of offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 having been committed. It appears on the basis of pre-summoning inquiry, the respondent stood summoned as accused.2. During the course of proceedings that followed, the parties took the dispute to the process of mediation where they entered into a settlement on 13.03.2012, in terms of which the respondent agreed to pay the cheque amount of Rs.45 lacs to the petitioner (complainant) by 31.07.2012. The case thereafter came up before the Metropolitan Magistrate on 21.03.2012 when the r...
Glencore International Ag vs.indian Potash Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on 31.1.2019 Judgment Pronounced on 09.08.2019 EX.P. 99/2015 GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AG ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr. Nakul Dewan with Mr. Moazzam Khan, Ms. Shweta Sahu, Mr. Brijesh Kumar, and Mr. Kartik Prasad, Advs. versus INDIAN POTASH LIMITED & ANR. ..... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Arjun Singh Bhati, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: Preface 1. The captioned execution petition seeks enforcement of foreign award dated 12.3.2012 (hereafter referred to as Final Award) and the cost of the reference awarded in favour of the decree holder i.e. Glencore International AG. (hereafter referred to as Glencore) which was passed by the arbitral tribunal after the final award on 12.5.2015 (hereafter referred to as Cost Award).2. Notice in the execution petition was issued on 23.3.2015. The judgment debtor i.e. India Potash Ltd. (hereafter referred to as IPL) entered appearance through its cou...
Akshat Bhardwaj & Ors. Vs.state of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~27 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"09th August, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3428/2019 AKSHAT BHARDWAJ & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Satya Veer Sharma, Advocate with petitioner no.1 in person with his father Mr. B.K. Bhardwaj versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for State R-2 in person with her father, Mr. Anoop Ralhan CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 15.12.2015. The marriage ran into rough weather, the second respondent raising allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) no.54/2017 having been registered on 10.02.2017 by police station Mandawali Fazalpur on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498-A/4of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first petitioner), his father (secon...
Jai Kishan @ Rajesh & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 09, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3938/2019 & CRL.M.A. 33227/2019 JAI KISHAN @ RAJESH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar & Mr. Devender Singh, Advocates. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Sanwat Ram. Mr. C.P. Singh, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1150/2015, under Section 498-A/4of IPC, registered Police Station Aman Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 18th September, 2018 reached between the parties and affidavit of 6th May, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Sanwat Ram on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 3938/2019...
Sriram Electrical Works vs.power Grid Corporation of India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~24 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 381/2019 SRIRAM ELECTRICAL WORKS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Praveen Agrawal, Advocate. versus POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pranay Kishore Mishra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER0908.2019 SANJEEV NARULA, J.I.A. 10867/2019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. I.A. 10868/2019 (delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the application is condoned and the application is disposed of. ARB.P. 381/2019 3. The present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the Act) seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator. The arbitration agreement is contained in Clause No.22 of the Letter of Award, dated 23rd December 2014 which reads as under: 22. Arbitration: In the event of any dispute or difference whatsoever arising under this contract or in connection therewith ARB.P. 381/2019 ...
l.r. College of Pharmacy vs.all India Council for Technical Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :08. 08.2019 Date of decision:09. 08.2019 W.P.(C) 7390/2019 & CM No.30801/2019 L.R. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat & Mr. Divyank Rana, Advocates. versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni & Mr. Abhinav Tyagi, Advocates for AICTE. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner- Institute seeks that it be declared that it is entitled to start the Pharmacy Courses namely Diploma in Pharmacy and Bachelor of Pharmacy on the basis of approval having been obtained from the Pharmacy Council of India and without obtaining approval from the respondent in terms of circular dated 07.06.2019 with the alternative prayer that the respondent be directed to the grant of approval to the petitioner for Diploma in Pharmacy and Bachelor of Pharmacy courses with an intake of 60 and 100 seats respectively for the academic session...
Minor X ( Through Father Kamal Malik) vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: August 9, 2019 W.P.(CRL) 2209/2019 MINOR X ( THROUGH FATHER KAMAL MALIK)........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Anwesh Madhukar, Adv. with Mr.Anshu Bhanot, Adv. versus STATE Represented by: Mr.Avi Singh, ASC with ..... Respondent Ms.Purnima, Adv. for the State with WSI Sangeeta, P.S. Nihal Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 33161/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2209/2019 1. By this petition, the petitioner who is a minor aged about 16 years and victim of rape seeks medical termination of pregnancy (in short, MTP).2. On the complaint of the petitioner, FIR No.504/2019 under Sections 376 IPC and 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act has already been registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar on 1st August, 2019.3. The petitioner is presently in protective custody at Nirmal Chhaya. W.P.(CRL) 2209/2019 Page 1 ...
Gunmala Jain & Ors vs.punam Jain & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h August, 2019 + CM(M) 1188/2019 GUNMALA JAIN & ORS Through: Mr.K.Sunil, Advocate ........ Petitioners PUNAM JAIN & ANR Through: None. versus ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % CM APPL. 35836/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 1188/2019 & CM APPL. 35835/2019 1. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order dated 29.05.2019, passed by the Civil Judge (Central), Tis Hazari Court, Delhi in Civil Suit No.99361/2016, whereby the Trial Court has dismissed the application of the petitioners herein [defendant Nos. 1 to 4 in the suit]. for permission to cross-examine two witnesses of the plaintiffs/respondents.2. The witnesses in question were examined by the plaintiffs/respondents as PW-2 & PW-3. The order sheets of the Trial Court record that cross-examination of PW-1 was c...
Ashok Kumar Mudgil Through Its Attorney Sushil Kumar vs.union of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~28 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) 8193/2018 & CM APPL. 31411/2018 ASHOK KUMAR MUDGIL THROUGH ITS ATTORNEY SUSHIL KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahesh Prasad with Mr. Alok K. Prasad, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anil Dabas with Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocates for UOI. Ms. Sangita Rai with Mr. Pradeep Singh, Advocates for Govt. of NCT of Delhi Mr. Ajay Verma, CGSC with Mr. G.S. Oberoi and Mr. Aman Verma for DDA. Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak with Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advocates for LAC/L&B. % CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER0908.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing today.2. The prayers in this petition read as under: W.P.(C) 8193/2018 Page 1 of 10 issue writ of Certiorari a) Issue writ of declaration declaring the acquisition proceedings together with the impugned notifications and award (I...
Binita Dass vs.uttam Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-09-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2019 CRL.REV.P. 659/2017 & Crl. M.A. 14463/2017 BINITA DASS versus UTTAM KUMAR ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar with Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondent : Ms. Sofia Bhambri, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 19.05.2016 whereby the appeal of the petitioner impugning order dated 04.08.2015, declining the application of the petitioner for grant of interim maintenance, has been dismissed.2.... Petitioner had filed an application under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and along with the application had filed an interim application under Section 23 seeking interim maintenance. Said application has been rejected by the Trial Court by CRL.REV.P.659/2017 Page 1 of 4 order dated 04.08.2015 solely on the ground ...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »