Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Avneet Singh Bedi and Anr vs.inder Pal Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
$~OS-27 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. 08.2019 + CS(OS) 687/2017 AVNEET SINGH BEDI AND ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Sanjiv Kakra, Mr.Ashim Shridhar and Ms.Niyati Patwardhan, Advs. versus INDER PAL SINGH AND ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Arvind Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajat Singh, Ms.Nidi Nagpal and Ms.Mallika Kamal, Advs. D. No.1 to 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) CS(OS) 687/2017 1. Some of the salient facts of this case are that the suit is filed for declaration that MOU dated 02.08.2017 is unenforceable, illegal, null and void and not binding on Plaintiff No.1; for a declaration that MOU dated 27.07.2017 is also unenforceable, illegal, null and void and for a declaration that the Agreement to Sell dated 15.12.2015 is unenforceable, illegal, null and void. Other connected reliefs are also sought. The grievance of the plaintiffs essentially is that plaintiff No.1 was coerced to sign the MOU dated 02.08.2017 while he ...
Chanderprabhu Jain College of Higher Education & School of Law & Anr. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) No.8163/2019 Judgment reserved on :29. 07.2019 Date of decision :13. 08.2019 CHANDERPRABHU JAIN COLLEGE OF HIGHER EDUCATION & SCHOOL OF LAW & ANR. ....... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sameer Rohatgi, Mr. Akshit Pradhan, Mr. Kunal Kumar, Mr. Dipender Chauhan & Mr. Sarin, Advocates. Soumya versus DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER EDUCATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, Advocate with Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Preetpal Singh, Advocate for BCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner No.1 Chanderprabhu Jain College of Higher Education & School of Law was founded under the aegis of the... Petitioner No.2 the Rishi Aurobindo Educational Society at Plot No.OCF Sector A-8, Narela, Delhi- 110040, in the year 2007 and in the W.P.(C) No.8163/2019 Page 1 of 33 year 2012 and 2013, the respondent No.1, i.e, the Directorate of Higher Education granted a No Objection Certificate to th...
Krishan Dabas vs.m/s Sapphire Cables & Services Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
$~17 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6694/2017 KRISHAN DABAS Date of Decision:13. h August, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Prakhar Bhatnagar, Mr.Mohit Tyagi, Mr.Aman Kharb, Ms.Ritu Raj Kumari, Advocates versus M/S SAPPHIRE CABLES & SERVICES PVT LTD..... Respondent Through: Mr.Jayant K. Mehta, Mr.Manikya Harpalani, Khanna, Ms.Drishti Mr.Pratyaksh Sharma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the award dated 04th March, 2017 1. passed by the Labour Court whereby the Labour Court held the termination of the petitioner to be illegal and awarded compensation of Rs.3 lakh in lieu of reinstatement. The petitioner is seeking reinstatement with back wages and in the alternative, enhancement of the compensation.2. The petitioner joined the respondent as a Cable Operator on 04th April, 2003. The respondent terminated the petitioner without any enquiry on 23rd February, 2011 whereupon the petitioner raised an indus...
Chhttar Singh vs.dtc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
$~8 & 9 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5070/2013 CHHTTAR SINGH DTC ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Raj Kumar Mann, Advocate versus Through: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, ..... Respondent Standing Counsel along with Mr.Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms.Laveena Arora, Advocates. for DTC + W.P.(C) 2059/2014 & CM APPL.4311/2014 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel along with Mr.Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms.Laveena Arora, Advocates for DTC1 CHATTAR SINGH versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Raj Kumar Mann, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Both the parties have challenged the award dated 13th March, 2013 whereby the Industrial Tribunal awarded the financial benefits of difference in the regular pay scale and the wages paid to the workman as a daily wager for a period of three years prior to the date of reference i.e. 22nd March, 2010.2. Learned counsel for the DTC submitted ...
Thirupathi Kodari & Anr vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) 9671/2017 & CM APPL. 39384/2017 THIRUPATHI KODARI & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Kushagra Bansal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Anil Dabas, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Rajiv Shukla, Adv. with Ms.Shivani Kapoor & Mr.Rahul Thapliyal, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby setting aside the final result dated 17.04.2017 issued by the Respondent no.2 and directing the said Respondent to renotify the recruitment process for the post of 'Junior Technical Assistant'.2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent no.2 on 20.09.2016 vide its advertisement no.CWC/1-Manpower/DR/Rectt/20invited online applications for various posts in its framework. Accordingly, the petitioners applied for the said post as provided on the website of respondent no.2. As W.P.(C) No.9671/2017 Pa...
K. L. Bhasin vs.punjab National Bank and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) 7518/2018 K. L. BHASIN Through Mr. Ashok Bhalla, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajesh Kumar with Ms. Sakshi Gaur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions thereby to set aside the Board of Directors Resolution dated 12.08.2006 of respondent no.l with regard to appropriation of Bank Contribution of PF of the petitioner amounting to 76,020/- towards alleged losses, as intimated to the petitioner by the respondent no.2 vide letter dated 23.01.2018, with all consequential and attendant benefits.2. Further seeks directions thereby to direct the respondents to release the Pensionary Benefits to the petitioner in terms of Regulation 33 of P.N.B.(Employees') Pension Regulations 1995 after completing the requisite formalities. W.P.(C) 7518/2018 Page 1 of 18 3. ...
d.p. Sharma vs.m/s Bses Rajdhani Power Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
+ W.P.(C) 8489/2016 D.P. SHARMA Reserved on:04. 07.2019 Pronounced on:13. 08.2019 ........ Petitioner $~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Adv. with Mr.Tenzing Thinlay Lepcha, Adv. versus M/S BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Gulshan Chawla, Adv. with Mr.Mohan Malik, Adv. for R-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 The present writ petition is directed against the impugned Order No.DGM (HR)/ 2015-16/204A dated 29.02.2016 passed by the respondents whereby the departmental appeal preferred by the petitioner against the Order No.SR.MGR(HR)/2015-dated 08.06.2015 passed by the disciplinary authority was dismissed.2. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has also challenged the impugned show cause notices dated 19.09.2014, 17.11.2014, 24.04.2015 and 13.05.2015 issued by respondent no.1 to the petitioner. W.P.(C) 8489/2016 Page 1 of 32 3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appoi...
Moral Alloys Private Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Trade & Taxes
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
$~26 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10153/2018 and CM APPl.39578/2018 (stay) MORAL ALLOYS PRIVATE LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajesh Jain with Mr.Virag Tiwari and Mr.Ramashish, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES Through: Mr.Satyakam, ASC with Mr.R.K.Ahuja, VATO Ward 8. ...... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER1308.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner, which is a private limited company engaged in the business of ferrous and non-ferrous metals, has filed this petition seeking the quashing of the impugned order of default assessment of tax and penalty and interest, dated 18th January, 2018 passed by the Assistant Value Added Tax Officer (AVATO) Ward No.8 under Sections 32 and 33 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act).2. The... Petitioner is registered under the DVAT Act as well as the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act). Between 30th May, 2011 and 26th June, 2013 the... Petitioner filed ...
Saubhagya Dua vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
$~53 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P. (C) 8303/2019 & CM APPL. 34388/2019, CM APPL. 35691-35692/2019 SAUBHAGYA DUA ........ Petitioner Date of Decision:13. 08.2019 Through: Mr. Prashant Bhusan, Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for R-1. Mr. Arjun Mitra, Adv. for R-2 with Prof. Siddharth Pandey, Chairman, JEE (Advance), Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to conduct a further special and/or spot round for admission against the vacant seats in IITs for eligible meritorious candidates in accordance with the merit list for JEE (Advanced), 2019 examination with a further prayer to the effect that the directions be issued to the respondents to grant admission to the meritorious petitioner student in any of the vacant seats in the IITs on the basis of his rank in the merit list for JEE (Advanc...
Infra Cool Private Limited vs.assam Industrial Development Corporation ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
$~16 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. 8.2019 ARB.P. 505/2019 INFRA COOL PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Gautam Dhamija, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent ASSAM INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER (ORAL): I.A. No.11045/2019 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. ARB.P. No.505/2019 2. This is a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petition has been filed in the background of the following broad facts:3. A Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) was issued on 25.6.2012 for turnkey supply, installation and commissioning of Cold Rooms, Ginger Washing Line, Material Handling and Allied Equipments etc. for Ginger Collection Centre at IID Center, Naltali in the District of Nagaon, Assam (in short the subject works).4. On 3.8.2012, the petitioner made an offer. The petitioners offer was accepted. Accordingly, a work order was issued...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »