Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Balkrishan vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) thr.cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 14, 2019 CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & CRL.M.A. 3145/2011 C.B.I. STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, ........ Petitioner Special Public Prosecutor with DSP Manoj Pathak. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public CRL.M.C. 2925/2014 & CRL.M.As. 10082/2014 & 13606/2015 + Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram. SANDEEP MALIK & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Kaadambari & Mr. Navin Kr. Thakur, Advocates. STATE & ANR. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI with DSP Manoj Pathak. + CRL.REV.P. 173/2011 & CRL.M.As. 16728/2017 & 20647/2017 BALKRISHAN Through: Mr. Vikas Arora & Ms. Radhika ........ Petitioner Arora, Advocates. CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & connected cases Page 1 of 9 + Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THR. CBI .....Respondent Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecut...
Cdr. S. P . Puri (Retd.) Sole Proprietor M/S Spiral Services vs.agricu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. 05.2019 Date of Decision:14.08.2019 O.M.P. 466/2015 CDR. S. P . PURI (RETD.) SOLE PROPRIETOR M/S SPIRAL SERVICES Through: Mr.Deeptakirti Verma, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE Through: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, standing counsel with Mr.N.K.Singh, Adv. ..... Respondent + + O.M.P. (COMM) 8/2016 & I.A. No.606/2016 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE Through: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, standing counsel with Mr.N.K.Singh, Adv ........ Petitioner versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA CDR. S.P.PURI (RETD.) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Deeptakirti Verma, Adv.1. These petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have been filed by the parties to the arbitration proceedings challenging the Arbitral Award dated 23.07.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Agreemen...
Pr. Commissioner of Customs (Prev.), vs.sushant Agrawal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
1 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CUSAA1762019 PR. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREV.), ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Reena Rawat, Advocate. Date of Decision:13. h August, 2019 SUSHANT AGRAWAL % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CM Appl. 21451/2019 (condonation of delay) Keeping in view the averments in the application, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, present application stands disposed of. CUSAA1762019 1. Present appeal has been filed under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 challenging the final order No.C/A/54316/2017-CU(DB) dated 22nd June, 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Customs Appeal No.C/251/2012. CUSAA1762019 Page 1 of 2 2. Learned counsel for appellant states that by virtue of the impugned order the Tribunal has remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority ...
Jaspreet Ghura vs.nct of Delhi and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6802/2019 & CM No.28459/2019, 28460/2019, 28461/2019, 32398/2019 JASPREET GHURA ........ Petitioner Through Mr Yatendra Sharma, Advocate. versus NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr Rizwan, Mr Sameydeen, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. Counsel for R-3 (appearance not given). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1308.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 17.05.2019, passed by the District Magistrate (DM), District Central, Daryaganj directing that the petitioner be evicted from the property bearing No.30/11, 3rd Floor, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi (hereafter the premises). The said order was passed to enforce an earlier order dated 04.02.2019 passed by the DM directing the petitioner to hand over vacant possession of the said property to respondent no.3 (the petitioners mother-in-law, Smt Ranjit Kaur Ghura). This order was passed on an application file...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.chattar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
$~8 & 9 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5070/2013 CHHTTAR SINGH DTC ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Raj Kumar Mann, Advocate versus Through: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, ..... Respondent Standing Counsel along with Mr.Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms.Laveena Arora, Advocates. for DTC + W.P.(C) 2059/2014 & CM APPL.4311/2014 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel along with Mr.Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms.Laveena Arora, Advocates for DTC1 CHATTAR SINGH versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Raj Kumar Mann, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Both the parties have challenged the award dated 13th March, 2013 whereby the Industrial Tribunal awarded the financial benefits of difference in the regular pay scale and the wages paid to the workman as a daily wager for a period of three years prior to the date of reference i.e. 22nd March, 2010.2. Learned counsel for the DTC submitted ...
Deepak @ Deepu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. 08.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1694/2019 DEEPAK @ DEEPU STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kumar and Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advs. Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with SI Shri Krishna Singh. For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail in FIR No.195/2017 under Sections 376-D/376 (2)/506 of the IPC read with Section 6 of POCSO on the ground of medical condition of his sister.2. 3. Status report is filed and is taken on record. It is contended that the sister of the petitioner is aged 20 years and weighs only 27 Kgs. She is presently under treatment from Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, Hari Nagar, Delhi for tuberculosis. BAIL APPLN. 1694/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. It is contended that she has to be taken to the hospital twice a week and because of her condi...
Man Singh vs.reliance Integrated Services Private Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
$~18 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6699/2017 MAN SINGH Through: Mr.Prakhar Bhatnagar, Mr.Mohit Tyagi, Mr.Aman Kharb, Ms.Ritu Raj Kumari, Advocates ........ Petitioner 1. versus RELIANCE INTEGRATED SERVICES PRIVATE LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Jayant K. Mehta, Mr.Manikya Harpalani, Khanna, Ms.Drishti Mr.Pratyaksh Sharma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the award dated 06th March, 2017 passed by the Labour Court whereby the Labour Court held the termination of the petitioner to be illegal and awarded compensation of Rs.3 lakh in lieu of reinstatement. The petitioner is seeking reinstatement with back wages and in the alternative, enhancement of the compensation.2. The petitioner joined the respondent as a Cable Operator on 17th July, 2003. The respondent terminated the petitioner without any enquiry on 24th February, 2011 whereupon the petitioner raised an indust...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.ram Phal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
Date of Decision:13. 08.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~14,39,40,44,45,49-152. * + % W.P.(C) Nos. 1111/2017, 1989/2019, 2031/2019, 5490/2019, 5886/2019, 1114/2017, 1118/2017, 1119/2017, 1459/2017, 1553/2017, 1554/2017, 2179/2017, 2180/2017, 2211/2017, 2233/2017, 2234/2017, 2653/2017, 2673/2017, 2675/2017, 2678/2017, 2679/2017, 2736/2017, 2743/2017, 2744/2017, 2745/2017, 2748/2017, 2749/2017, 2750/2017. 2751/2017, 2759/2017, 2762/2017, 2763/2017, 2788/2017, 2804/2017, 2887/2017, 2888/2017, 2889/2017, 2892/2017, 2900/2017, 2901/2017, 2902/2017, 2903/2017, 2904/2017, 2905/2017, 2908/2017, 2909/2017, 3305/2017, 3306/2017, 3394/2017, 3395/2017, 3396/2017, 3399/2017, 3633/2017, 3643/2017, 3655/2017, 3785/2017, 3786/2017, 3789/2017, 3790/2017, 3851/2017, 3975/2017, 3977/2017, 3978/2017, 3979/2017, 8216/2017, 3980/2017, 3984/2017, 4068/2017, 4069/2017, 4074/2017, 4158/2017, 4452/2017, 4503/2017, 4504/2017, 4508/2017, 4619/2017, 5050/2017, 5074/2017, 5077/2017, 5104/2017, 5107/20...
Sunaina Devi & Anr vs.rakesh Vatsa & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. 08.2019 + RFA No.729/2019 SUNAINA DEVI & ANR Through Mr.Bipin Jha, Adv. ..... Appellants versus RAKESH VATSA & ANR Through Nemo. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) CM No.36083/2019 (for exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM No.36085/2019 (for condonation of delay in filing) 3. This application has been filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 60 days delay in filling the appeal.4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of 60 days in filing the appeal is condoned.5. The application is disposed of. CM No.36086/2019 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) 6. This application has been filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 66 days delay in re-filling the appeal.7. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of 66 days in re-filing the app...
Ankur Sehgal & Ors vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 13, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3966/2019 ANKUR SEHGAL & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Aliya Durafshan, Mr. Vikas Kumar, Mr. Manish Paliwal and Mr. Dheeraj Singh, Advocates. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Arun Kumar. Mr. Prosenjeet Banerjee and Ms. Meera Menon, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.176/2017, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Hazarat Nizamuddin, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Settlement of 15th May, 2019. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Arun Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 39...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »