Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shogun Organics Ltd. Vs.gaur Hari Guchhait & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16th May, 2019 Date of decision:14. h August, 2019 + CS (COMM) 201/2017 SHOGUN ORGANICS LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H., Mr. Tahir A. J.& Ms. Swapnil Gaur, Advocates (M- 9910206718) versus GAUR HARI GUCHHAIT & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sahu and Mr. P. C. for D-1 Arya, Advocates (M:99536. 9591 & 9818021816) Mr. Manav Kumar, Advocate for D-4 & 5. (M:96544. 8699) to 3. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The Plaintiff - Shogun Organics Limited, a company engaged in the research, manufacture and sale of mosquito repellents has filed the present suit seeking a permanent injunction restraining infringement of its Patent IN-236630 (IN630). The patent relates to a Process for manufacturing d- trans Allethrin, which is used as an active ingredient in mosquito repellents and other mosquito control products.2. The claim of the Plaintiff is that it researched and developed a ...
Agricultural Produce Market Committee vs.cdr. s.p.puri (Retd.)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. 05.2019 Date of Decision:14.08.2019 O.M.P. 466/2015 CDR. S. P . PURI (RETD.) SOLE PROPRIETOR M/S SPIRAL SERVICES Through: Mr.Deeptakirti Verma, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE Through: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, standing counsel with Mr.N.K.Singh, Adv. ..... Respondent + + O.M.P. (COMM) 8/2016 & I.A. No.606/2016 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE Through: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, standing counsel with Mr.N.K.Singh, Adv ........ Petitioner versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA CDR. S.P.PURI (RETD.) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Deeptakirti Verma, Adv.1. These petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have been filed by the parties to the arbitration proceedings challenging the Arbitral Award dated 23.07.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Agreemen...
Varaha Infra - Jceg (Jv) vs.national Highway Authority of India and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:14. h August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8312/2019 VARAHA INFRA - JCEG (JV) ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nina Nariman, Mr. A.K. Vali, Mr. Tuhin, Mr. Rajat Jain and Mr. Bhaskar Vali, Advocates versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ankur Mittal and Mr. Abhay Gupta, Advocates for respondent no.1. Mr. Vikram for UOI/respondent no.2. Jetly, CGSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. Before the rival submissions of the learned counsels for the parties can be noticed, we deem it appropriate to outline the facts which have led to the filing of this writ petition. An E-tender was invited on 09.02.2018 by the respondent no.1 NHAI inviting tenders for Six Laning of existing Four Lane road from Gundugola...
Nittin Johari vs.serious Fraud Investigation Office
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: August 09, 2019 Pronounced on: August 14, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 1971/2019 & Crl.M.A. 33316/2019 NITTIN JOHARI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Mr. Gautam Khazanchi, Mr. Akshilesh Kumar & Mr. Pradyuman Kaistha, Advocates. Versus SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Ajay Digpal, CGSC & Mr. Sameer S. Sinha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER... Petitioner is seeking regular bail in CC No.770/2019, titled as + Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Bhushan Steel Limited & Ors. while claiming to be innocent and in custody since 2nd May, 2019. Learned senior counsel for petitioner submits that in the complaint under Section 212 of the Companies Act, 2013, it is averred that petitioner, who was the Chief Financial Officer and Director (Finance) of Bhushan Steel Limited (hereinafter referred to as BSL), had conniv...
Anwar Hussain vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"14th August, 2019 + CRL.A. 753/2002 ANWAR HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.P. Singh Chaudhari, Advocate with Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Mr. Udhav Pratap, & Mr. Ujjwal Goel, Advocates along with Appellant in person. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was arrested on 20.09.1996 in the wake of registration of first information report (FIR) No.853/1996 by Police Station Punjabi Bagh, the investigation eventually resulting in his trial (in Sessions Case No.37/1997) in the court of Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) on the charge for the offences punishable under section 394 read with section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. On conclusion of the said trial, he was held guilty and convicted, as charged, by the trial court, by its judgment dated 16.08.2002. By order dated 17.08.2002, r...
Dalip Kumar Gupta vs.kushal Chand Garg & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"14.08.2019 RFA5692019 & C.M. No.28037/2019 (for stay) DALIP KUMAR GUPTA Through Mr.Shesh Datt Ms.Shruti Sharma, Advs. versus ..... Appellant Sharma with KUSHAL CHAND GARG & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.J.P.Gupta with Mr.Rikky Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been preferred assailing the judgment and decree dated 24.04.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi decreeing the suit for possession filed by the respondent/plaintiff being Civil Suit No.1634/2016.2. Under the impugned judgment, the appellant/defendant has been directed to hand over the vacant and peaceful possession of the suit premises situated at the property bearing no.3/130, Lalita Park, Laxmi Nagar, New Delhi comprising of Shop no.4 on the ground floor along with a small portion of t...
Ms. Deepa Arya vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~35, 38,39,40 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2019 + W.P.(CRL) 2627/2018 & Crl. M.A. 31326/2018, 33540/2018, 2703- 2704/2019, 11227/2019 PURNIMA UPPAL & ORS versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR + W.P.(CRL) 1545/2019 DEEPA ARYA THE STATE & ANR + W.P.(CRL) 1546/2019 MS. DEEPA ARYA THE STATE & ANR + W.P.(CRL) 1548/2019 DEEPA ARYA THE STATE & ANR + W.P.(CRL) 1550/2019 DEEPA ARYA versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus versus versus W.P. (CRL) 2627/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 7 THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Vipin Kumar Anand & Mr. Jhakur Sumit, Advs. Mr. Prashant Sharma, Adv. with petitioners in person. Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ...
Central Bureau of Investigation vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 14, 2019 CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & CRL.M.A. 3145/2011 C.B.I. STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, ........ Petitioner Special Public Prosecutor with DSP Manoj Pathak. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public CRL.M.C. 2925/2014 & CRL.M.As. 10082/2014 & 13606/2015 + Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram. SANDEEP MALIK & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Kaadambari & Mr. Navin Kr. Thakur, Advocates. STATE & ANR. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI with DSP Manoj Pathak. + CRL.REV.P. 173/2011 & CRL.M.As. 16728/2017 & 20647/2017 BALKRISHAN Through: Mr. Vikas Arora & Ms. Radhika ........ Petitioner Arora, Advocates. CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & connected cases Page 1 of 9 + Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THR. CBI .....Respondent Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecut...
Purnima Uppal & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~35, 38,39,40 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2019 + W.P.(CRL) 2627/2018 & Crl. M.A. 31326/2018, 33540/2018, 2703- 2704/2019, 11227/2019 PURNIMA UPPAL & ORS versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR + W.P.(CRL) 1545/2019 DEEPA ARYA THE STATE & ANR + W.P.(CRL) 1546/2019 MS. DEEPA ARYA THE STATE & ANR + W.P.(CRL) 1548/2019 DEEPA ARYA THE STATE & ANR + W.P.(CRL) 1550/2019 DEEPA ARYA versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus versus versus W.P. (CRL) 2627/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 7 THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Vipin Kumar Anand & Mr. Jhakur Sumit, Advs. Mr. Prashant Sharma, Adv. with petitioners in person. Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ...
Sohan Lal & Ors vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h August, 2019. CS(OS) 109/2009 SOHAN LAL & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Rajat Navet and Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advs. for D-1/UOI. Mr. Digvijay Rai and Mr. Aman Yadav, Advs. for D-2/AAI. Mr. Subrat Deb and Mr. Sujeet Kumar, Advs. for D-3/DDA. Mr. S.K. Rout and Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Advs. for D-13,15,16&17. Mr. Anil Tomar, E.A.(A), Director of Punchayats. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The ten plaintiffs, of which five are the sons of Yad Ram and the other five are sons of Udey Ram, instituted this suit in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Delhi, (i) for declaration that the plaintiffs are entitled to (a) 500 sq. yds. of land in Khasra No.1242; (b) 2/3rd share in 150 sq. yds. of land in Khasra No.1210; (c) 302 sq. yds. of land in Khasra No.123and 1238/3; and, (d) 1/3rd share ...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »