Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sarabjeet Kaur vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1273/2019 Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2019 SARABJEET KAUR versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. Sumit Sarna and Ms. Mamta Sarna, Advocates Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. Mr. Sahil Malik, Advocate SI Murari Lal, PS Prasad Nagar JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.59/2017 under Sections 406/420/120B/174A IPC registered at PS Prasad Nagar.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the husband of the... Petitioner had represented to the complainant that he would secure a job in DDA and accordingly, took approximately Rs.49,50,000/-. Neither a job in DDA was secured nor was the amount refunded.3. Learned APP submits that the husband of the... Petitioner was BAIL APPLN. 1273/2019 Page 1 of 3 granted interim bail sub...
Sandeep Malik & Anr vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 14, 2019 CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & CRL.M.A. 3145/2011 C.B.I. STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, ........ Petitioner Special Public Prosecutor with DSP Manoj Pathak. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public CRL.M.C. 2925/2014 & CRL.M.As. 10082/2014 & 13606/2015 + Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram. SANDEEP MALIK & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Kaadambari & Mr. Navin Kr. Thakur, Advocates. STATE & ANR. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI with DSP Manoj Pathak. + CRL.REV.P. 173/2011 & CRL.M.As. 16728/2017 & 20647/2017 BALKRISHAN Through: Mr. Vikas Arora & Ms. Radhika ........ Petitioner Arora, Advocates. CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & connected cases Page 1 of 9 + Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THR. CBI .....Respondent Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecut...
Monika Wadhwa vs.high Court of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~55 * + Date of Decision:14. 8.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.8772/2019 MONIKA WADHWA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Meenal Duggal, Adv. for Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 24.02.2018 passed by the respondent whereby the petitioners representation dated 08.02.2017 has been rejected. The order dated 24.02.2018 passed by the respondent, in so far as it is relevant, reads as follows: I am desired to refer to your representation dated 08.02.2017 requesting to appoint you to the post of Private Secretary w.e.f. 12.09.2011 (the date on which the post of Private Secretary became vacant with all consequential benefits) instead of 20.12.2016 and to inform you that the same has been considered and rejected by the co...
Lalita Saini vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :09. 08.2019 Date of Decision:14. 08.2019 + CRL.M.C. 3903/2019 and CRL.M.A. 33058/2019 (stay) LALITA SAINI Through: Mr. Anurag Jain and Ms. Ayushi Sharma, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with with Insp. Ashwani Kumar, EOW. Mr. Dinesh Kumar Sabharwal, Mr. Sameer Bhatnagar and Ms. Heena Ahluwalia, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.1. By way of present petition filed under Section 482 CrPC read with Section 439(2) CrPC, the petitioner has brought a challenge to an order dated 02.08.2019 passed by the District and Sessions Judge (North-West), Rohini, Delhi, whereby respondent No.2 was granted default bail in terms of Section 167(2)(a)(ii) CrPC on the ground that the prosecution has failed to file the charge-sheet within the stipulated period of 60 days from the date of the first remand. It is contended that in...
Rumy Chowdhury vs.the Department of Revenue , Government of Nct, Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~34 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8780/2019 & CM No.36311/2019 & CM No.36310/2019 RUMY CHOWDHURY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Pranjal Kishore, Advocate. versus THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE , GOVERNMENT OF NCT, DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Mr Shadan Farasat, ASC, Ms Rudrakshi Deo and Mr Chirayu Jain, Advocate for R-1. Mr Amit Bansal with Mr Aman Rewaria, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER1408.2019 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning 1. Office Orders dated 26.11.2015 and 07.03.2017, to the extent that the said Office Orders require the applicant to produce a caste certificate of a relative from the paternal side, for the purpose of issuance of a caste certificate. The petitioner also impugns an order dated 31.07.2019, whereby the petitioners request for caste certificates in respect of her two children (boys aged above 17 year...
Manmohan & Anr vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 14, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3986/2019 & CRL.M.A. 33420/2019 MANMOHAN & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Tyagi, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Asmita Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 33421/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3986/2019 & CRL.M.A. 33420/2019 (Stay) Quashing of FIR No.222/2016, under Sections 498-A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Najafgarh, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 3rd August, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Asmita on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respond...
National Pharmaceutical pric.a vs.garima Seth and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:14. 08.2019 % + W.P.(C) 6441/2003 NATIONAL PHARMACEUTICAL PRIC.A Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus GARIMA SETH AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Mr. Shubham and Mr. Akash Dahiya, Advocates for respondent nos. 5, 7, 8 and 10. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed assailing the order dated 28.1.2003 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.153/2002 whereby the Central Administrative Tribunal has allowed the OA filed by the respondents herein and has granted them allowances at the minimum of the pay-scale of Rs.5,000-8,000/- as also one causal leave, if they serve for full one month. The Tribunal has also directed the petitioner herein to allow the respondents to continue to work without a break as long as the work so requires, in the absence of any regular posts. Li...
s.d.singh vs.united India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3007/2008 % 1. S.D.SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv. with Mr.Robin Singh, Advs. versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Pankaj Singh Thakur, Adv. for Mr. K.L.Nandwani, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT1408.2019 These proceedings owe their origin to Memorandum, dated 6th June, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the charge-sheet), issued to the petitioner by the Assistant General Manager and disciplinary authority, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (the respondent herein, though impleaded in the name of its Chief Regional Manager), proposing to initiate an inquiry, against the petitioner, under Rule 25 of the General Insurance (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the CDA Rules), and calling on the petitioner to submit his response thereto.2. The charge-sheet contained four Articles of Charge, against the petitioner, numbered Ar...
Deepa Arya vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~35, 38,39,40 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2019 + W.P.(CRL) 2627/2018 & Crl. M.A. 31326/2018, 33540/2018, 2703- 2704/2019, 11227/2019 PURNIMA UPPAL & ORS versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR + W.P.(CRL) 1545/2019 DEEPA ARYA THE STATE & ANR + W.P.(CRL) 1546/2019 MS. DEEPA ARYA THE STATE & ANR + W.P.(CRL) 1548/2019 DEEPA ARYA THE STATE & ANR + W.P.(CRL) 1550/2019 DEEPA ARYA versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus versus versus W.P. (CRL) 2627/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 7 THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Vipin Kumar Anand & Mr. Jhakur Sumit, Advs. Mr. Prashant Sharma, Adv. with petitioners in person. Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ...
Krishan Gulia & Anr vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 14, 2019 CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & CRL.M.A. 3145/2011 C.B.I. STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, ........ Petitioner Special Public Prosecutor with DSP Manoj Pathak. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public CRL.M.C. 2925/2014 & CRL.M.As. 10082/2014 & 13606/2015 + Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram. SANDEEP MALIK & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Kaadambari & Mr. Navin Kr. Thakur, Advocates. STATE & ANR. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI with DSP Manoj Pathak. + CRL.REV.P. 173/2011 & CRL.M.As. 16728/2017 & 20647/2017 BALKRISHAN Through: Mr. Vikas Arora & Ms. Radhika ........ Petitioner Arora, Advocates. CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & connected cases Page 1 of 9 + Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THR. CBI .....Respondent Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecut...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »