Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. S. Sanan vs.the State (Through C B I)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 19, 2019 CRL. A. 1256/2014 & CRL.M.A. 13992/2014 S K BHATIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Mr. Sermon Rawat, Mr. Parikshit Goyal and Ms. Aastha Vishwakarma, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Special Public CRL. A. 1136/2014 Prosecutor with Mr. Indranil Mohan, Advocate AJAY KUMAR GOEL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.A. Hashmi, Mr. Zeeshan Hashmi & Mr. I.A. Alwi, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor CRL. A. 1193/2014 S. S. SANAN Through: Mr. Gagan Manocha, ..... Appellant Crl.A.1256/2014 Crl.A.1136/2014 Crl.A.1193/2014 Page 1 of 7 Mr. Kushdeep Gaur, Mr. Nikhil Ahuja & Mr. R. Tyagi, Advocates Versus THE STATE (through C B I) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER In the above captioned three appeals...
Manoj Kumar & Anr vs.govt of Nct Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA4582019 and CM APPL. 32054-55/2019 IN THE MATTER OF: MANOJ KUMAR & ANR Reserved on:19. 07.2019 Date of decision:19. 08.2019 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Puneet Taneja and Ms. Laxmi Kumari, Advocates versus GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rizwan, Advocate for R-1/GNCTD. Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for R-2/LAC. Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for R-3/DDA. LPA4592019 and CM APPL. 32056-57/2019 + BHUSHAN LAL RAJPAL * + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Puneet Taneja and Ms. Laxmi Kumari, Advocates versus GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rizwan, Advocate for R-1/GNCTD. Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for R-2/LAC. Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for R-3/DDA. LPA4602019 and CM APPL.32058-59/2019 + RAMESH KUMAR GOEL & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Puneet Taneja and Ms. Laxmi Kumari, Advocates versus Page 1 of 14 LPA458460/2019 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rizwan, Advocate for R-1/GNCTD. Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for R...
M/S Ardee Housing Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.vijay Building Apratment Owners Ass ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~76 * + Date of Decision:19. 8.2019 % M/S ARDEE HOUSING PVT LTD & ANR FAO (OS) No.137/2019 & CM APPL. 34043/2019 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Sharma and Mr. B. Shekhar, Advs. versus VIJAY BUILDING APRATMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION Through: Mr. Sandeep Agarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rama Shanker, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant has preferred this intra court appeal to assail the order dated 23.07.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in I.A. No.9496/2015 (for stay) and I.A. No.1196/2019 (to seek clarification of order dated 18.12.2018). The respondent - Vijay Building Apartment Owners Association has filed the civil suit being CS (OS) 1261/2015, inter alia, to seek a decree of declaration and permanent and mandatory injunction against the defendant in the said suit. The appellant is a defendant in the said suit...
Abhishek Tanwar vs.the State of Delhi (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 782/2019, CRL.M.A. 32034/2019 (stay) and CRL.M.A. 32035/2019 (delay) Reserved on :01. 08.2019 Date of Decision :14. 08.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: ABHISHEK TANWAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. D. Hasija, Advocate with Mr. Mustafa Ahmad Khan, Advocate versus THE STATE OF DELHI (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Dr. M P Singh, APP for State with SI Krishan Kumar, PS Moti Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 By way of the present petition, the petitioner has assailed the order on charge dated 28.03.2019 passed by the Court of District & Sessions Judge (West) Tis Hazari Court, Delhi under Section 308/323/5IPC arising out of FIR No.0395/2016.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has primarily challenged the impugned order on three grounds namely:-"(i) as per the MLC the injury was opined to be simple; (ii) the weapon was not recovered; and no public witness has been associated with the (iii) investigation. CRL.REV.P. 782...
c.b.i. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 14, 2019 CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & CRL.M.A. 3145/2011 C.B.I. STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, ........ Petitioner Special Public Prosecutor with DSP Manoj Pathak. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public CRL.M.C. 2925/2014 & CRL.M.As. 10082/2014 & 13606/2015 + Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram. SANDEEP MALIK & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Kaadambari & Mr. Navin Kr. Thakur, Advocates. STATE & ANR. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Tej Ram. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI with DSP Manoj Pathak. + CRL.REV.P. 173/2011 & CRL.M.As. 16728/2017 & 20647/2017 BALKRISHAN Through: Mr. Vikas Arora & Ms. Radhika ........ Petitioner Arora, Advocates. CRL.M.C. 829/2011 & connected cases Page 1 of 9 + Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THR. CBI .....Respondent Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecut...
Sh. Anoop @ Sonu & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 14, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3981/2019 SH. ANOOP @ SONU & ORS. Through: Mr. Nitin Raj, Advocate .....Petitioners versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Devender Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.33407/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3981/2019 Quashing of FIR No.927/2015, under Sections 498-A/406 of IPC, registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar (West), Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 25th January, 2018. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Devender Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 3981/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in t...
Shri O P Gupta & Ors vs.shri Deepak Gupta & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on :8. h August, 2019 Date of decision :14. h August, 2019 CS (OS) 3416/2015 SHRI O P GUPTA & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Aaditya Vijaykumar, Advocate (M-9717622082) versus SHRI DEEPAK GUPTA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Saurabh Malhotra, Mr. Yatin Chadha, Advocates for D-1 Mr. Abhijat & Mr. Arpit Kr. Singh, Advocates for D-1, Mr. Neeraj K. Gupta & Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocates for D-2 Mr. A.K. Gandhi, Advocate for D-4 (M-9873146974) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A.10572/2018 JUDGMENT1 There are three proceedings - namely CS (OS) 3416/2015, CS (OS) 613/2017& Test Case 44/2017 pending amongst the family members of Late Shri O. P. Gupta. He left behind his wife - Defendant No.2- Mrs. Neelam Gupta, two daughters namely Ms. Shefali Gupta- Defendant No.3and Ms. Sophia Gupta, and a son Mr. Deepak Gupta- Defendant No.1. One of the properties left behind by Late Shri O. P. Gupta is property bear...
Union of India vs.tarun Kumar Kakar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Delivered on:14. h August, 2019 + RSA2292017 & CM APPL No.34206/2017 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate versus TARUN KUMAR KAKAR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.J.S.Garkal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This second appeal is against the judgment dated 03.05.2017 passed in RCA817 by learned ADJ-01 (South), New Delhi vide which the learned ADJ had dismissed the appeal against the judgment and decree in CS No.2dated 18.04.2016 passed by learned SCJ-cum- RC(South)/Saket Courts, New Delhi.2. Before coming to this appeal it would be appropriate to state few facts on record. (i) The father of the plaintiff/respondent namely late Ram Chand Kakar migrated from Pakistan and was a displaced person. He was granted a claim by Ministry of Rehabilitation in lieu of property which he had left in Pakistan; RSA No.229/2017 Page 1 of 8 (ii) since he did not have sufficient funds, hence per...
Sh. Vicky Bidhlan @ Vicky Birla & Ors vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 14, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3993/2019 SH. VICKY BIDHLAN @ VICKY BIRLA & ORS......Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajender Yadav, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Pushpendra Mr. J.K. Mishra, Advocate with respondent No 2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 33451/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3993/2019 Quashing of FIR No.13/2016, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Ambedkar Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 26th October, 2018. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Pushpendra on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 3993/2019 Page 1 o...
Sagar Infra Rail International Ltd & Ors. Vs.perfect Synergy Advisory ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2019
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:14.08.2019 LPA3972019 SAGAR INFRA RAIL INTERNATIONAL LTD & ORS...Appellants Through: Mr. Tarun Chandiok, Adv. with Ms.Geetha, Adv. versus PERFECT SYNERGY ADVISORY PVT LTD Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original defendants in CS (OS) 614/2016. An application being Crl. M.A. 8483/2019 was preferred by the appellants (original defendants) under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), which has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide order dated 23rd April, 2019 (Annexure A-1 to the memo of this LPA). Hence, the original defendants have preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal.2. We have heard the counsel appearing for the appellants (original defendants) in CS(OS) 614/2016. It appears from the facts of the case that the respondent (ori...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »