Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay & Ors. Vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
$~6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1165/2019 SANJAY & ORS. Decided on:-"19th August, 2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Murari Tiwari & Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advs. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Sunil Kumar, PS Civil Lines. Mr.C.M. Sharma, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 27.05.2013. The marriage ran into rough weather and they started living separately since 20.08.2014. The second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) No.33/2015 having been registered on 24.01.2015 by police station Civil lines, Delhi, on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case being directed against her husband (first pet...
Mr. Munish Kumar Bhunsali vs.kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. t January, 2019 Decided on:19. h August, 2019 W.P.(CRL) 2397/2018 & Crl.M.A.29851/2018 MR. MUNISH KUMAR BHUNSALI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rajeev Mehra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Pallav Saxena, Ms.Bindu Das and Mr.Abhilash Attri, Advocates versus KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. .. Respondent Represented by: Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Mahip Dutta, Mr.Sachin Jain and Ms.Diya Kapoor, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 M/s. KEW Precision Parts Private Limited (in short the company) approached the respondent/ Bank for availing financial facilities which were sanctioned vide letter dated 23rd November, 2012. For the said facilities Munish Kumar Bhunsali, the petitioner herein besides Kumud Jain and Mohit Kumar Bhunsali executed several security documents to secure the facilities. The company again approached the respondent/ Bank for renewal of existing financial facilities in March, 2013 which were renewed vide...
Genpact India Private Limited vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
W.P. (C) 686/2017 & CM293902019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * 12 + GENPACT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr S. Ganesh, Senior Advocate with Mr Rishi Agrawala, Mr Karan Luthra and Ms Aarushi Tiku, Advocates. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue/R-1 with Mr Deepak Garg, Additional CIT, Range- 10. Mr Dev P. Bhardwaj, Central Govt. Standing Counsel for R-2 with Ms Anubha Bhardwaj, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER1908.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Aggrieved by one portion of the assessment order concerning the alleged liability of the... Petitioner (hereafter the Assessee) under Sections 115-QA and 115-QB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) in the impugned assessment order dated 31st December, 2016 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) (Respondent No.1), the Assessee has approached this Court with the present petition under Articl...
Manoj Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 19, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 4028/2019 MANOJ KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Tanwar and Ms. Jyoti Bharti, Advocates versus STATE & ORS. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Madan Lal... RESPONDENTS No.2 to 5 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.33574/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4028/2019 Quashing of FIR No.302/2018, under Sections 323/452/506/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Sector-23 Dwarka, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of... RESPONDENTS No.2 to 5. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that due to inadvertence, the name of co-accused-Arun was left out and has handed over Amended Memo of Parties impleading co-accused - Arun s/o Sh. Jai Prakash in CRL.M.C. 4028/2019 Page 1 of 3 this petition. The Amended Memo of Parties is taken on record. Upon notice, lear...
Rohit Jain & Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
$~73. * + % W.P.(C.) No.8895/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. 08.2019 ROHIT JAIN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Yelamanchili Shiva Santosh Kumar & Mr. Rudrajit Ghosh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC and Mr.Jatin Puniyani & Mr. Farman Ali, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 36681/2019 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 8895/2019 3. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 01.05.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in O.A. Nos. 3932/2018 & 3933/2018. The petitioners also W.P.(C) 8895/2019 Page 1 of 16 assail the circular dated 20.09.2018 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, wherein...
Malvinder Singh & Ors vs.govind Ballabh Bhagat & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d July, 2019 Pronounced on:19. h August, 2019 CM(M) 583/2018 & CM APPL. 20259/2018 MALVINDER SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Manjula Gandhi, Advocate with Ms. Bhawna and Mr. Aditya Kapoor, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Abdul Kalam, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS GOVIND BALLABH BHAGAT & ORS % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT1 This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order dated 27.03.2018 in CS No.10830/2016, whereby the ADJ-06, South-East, Saket Courts, New Delhi allowed the application of the plaintiffs [respondents herein]. under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [CPC]. for amendment of the plaint. Facts 2. The respondents/plaintiffs in the suit are the descendants of one Khyali Ram Bhagat, plaintiff No.1 being his son [Govind Ballabh Bhagat]., and plaintiff Nos. 2 to 4 being the legal heirs of his CM(M) 583/2018 Page 1 of 20 predec...
Delhi Public Library vs.the Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6769/2014 Mr. Yashpal Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus DELHI PUBLIC LIBRARY Through: + W.P.(C) 4189/2015 & CM APPL.7585/2015 THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. for Mr. Sanjay Ghose, ASC for GNCTD DELHI PUBLIC LIBRARY Through: Mr. Yashpal Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. for Mr.Sanjay Ghose, ASC for GNCTD ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % 1. JUDGMENT1908.2019 The awards, dated 21st July, 2014 and 24th February, 2015, passed by the learned Industrial Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the learned Tribunal), which have been impugned in W.P. (C) 6769/2014 and W.P. (C) 4189/2015 respectively, are interconnected, W.P.(C) 6769/2014 & W.P.(C) 4189/2015 Page 1 of 56 and arise from disputes, which are cognate in nature, between the petitioner and Respondent No.2. These writ petitions are, ...
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.arvind Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~27 * % + MAC.APP. 725/2019, CM APPL. 36739/2019 & CM APPL. Decided on:19. 08.2019 36740/2019 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS ARVIND KUMAR & ORS Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation on the ground that the cover note which forms the basis of the claim was fraudulent. This issue has been dealt with in the impugned order as under:-"20. Respondent No.1 and 2 have claimed that offending vehicle was duly insured with respondent No.3 and R2W1 produced the original cover note dated 08.10.2014 Ex.R2W1/1. On the other hand, the said cover note was challenged by the insurer and it was deposed by R3W1 that the proposal form and insurance cover note Ex.R3Wand EX.R3Wrespectively were issued on 15.10.2014. If the original cover note Ex.R2Wis compared with carbon copy of cover note EX.R3W1/2, it beco...
Dr. Kavita Yadav vs.the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~72 * + Date of Decision:19. 8.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.8884/2019 DR. KAVITA YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sourabh Gupta and Mr. Puneet Yadav, Advocates. versus THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT & ORS Through: Mr. D.Verma, Adv. for R-2 and 3. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 36652/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 8884/2019 & C.M. No.36653/2019,C.M. No.36654/2019 1. The petitioner assails the order dated 12.4.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, in O.A19782018. The said W.P.(C.) No.8884/2019 Page 1 of 15 Original Application preferred by the petitioner has been rejected by the Tribunal as being devoid of merit. The petitioner had preferred the Original Application to seek directions to the respondents to grant her matern...
Prateek Singhal vs.national Testing Agency (Nta) Department of High Ed ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.8307/2019 and CM No.34399/2019 Judgment reserved on :14. 8.2019 Date of decision :19. 8.2019 PRATEEK SINGHAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.M.Sinha and versus Mr.P.M.Sinha, Advocates NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY (NTA) DEPARTMENT OF HIGH EDUCATION MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELPMENT AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Amit Bansal, Adv for R-1 Mr.Arjun Mitra, Adv forJoSAA CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ANU MALHOTRA, J.JUDGMENT1 The petitioner who obtained 322 marks out of 500 in 10+2 Examination conducted for the year 2017-18 and who thus secured 64.4% marks in the Standard 12 examination conducted by the CBSE seeks to pursue the Five year B. Arch. Degree course at the Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal. The petitioner applied for the JEE (Main) vide application dated 27.9.2018 of which the result was declared of the First Attempt on 31.1.2019 and the petitioner also appeared for the second Attempt...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »