Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anshul Yadav vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 19, 2019 + CRL.A. 800/2019 ANSHUL YADAV ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurang Gupta & Mr. Tez Yadav, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Indronil Mohan, Advocate & with Mr. Raj Saurabh, Inspector + CRL.A. 849/2019 RAKESH KUMAR @ RAKESH GOSWAMI .....Appellant Through: Mr. G. Sivabalamurgan, Mr. Deepak Sharma& Mr. Anis Mohd., Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Indronil Mohan & Ms. Santwana, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER Crl.A. 800/2019 Crl.A. 849/2019 Page 1 of 3 Crl.M.(B) 1304/2019 in CRL.A. 800/2019 Crl.M.(B) 1285/2019 in CRL.A. 849/2019 Vide impugned judgment, applicants/appellants - Anshul Yadav and Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Goswami have been convicted for the offence under Section 1...
Naveen Malhotra & Anr. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
$~ 26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C. 3993/2017 Decided on:-"19th August, 2019 NAVEEN MALHOTRA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur & Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Erstwhile Advs. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State. Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint (earlier CC No.4024/2013 now CC No.629398/2016) instituted by the second respondent bank (the complainant), after preliminary inquiry, the petitioners herein were summoned as accused, by order dated 16.03.2013, of the Metropolitan Magistrate, calling them upon to answer the accusations of offence under Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the cheque No.569843, issued on 22.12.2012 for an amount of Rs. 2.42 crores, under the signatures of the first petitioner being its subject matter. The petitioners having put in appearance, moved application under Sec...
Indrajit Bose vs.sharmistha Bose
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 08.2019 CRL.REV.P. 137/2017 & Crl. M.A. 8320/2017 & 11335/2017 INDRAJIT BOSE SHARMISTHA BOSE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent : Mr.S.V.Rateria, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr.Ashutosh Bhattacharjee, Adv. : JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 14.12.2016 whereby the appeal of the petitioner impugning order dated 16.01.2015 of the Trial Court fixing interim maintenance was rejected. Interim maintenance of Rs.5000/- per month was fixed by the Trial Court.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by order dated 22.05.2017, on default of the petitioner to pay the arrears of maintenance, his defence has been struck off.3. Learned counsel for the parties agree that on petitioner paying the entire arrears of maintenance to the respondent in two equal instalments, ...
Sukhpal Singh vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi )
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 696/2016 and CRL.M.A. 373/2018 (direction) Reserved on :05. 08.2019 Date of Decision :19. 08.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: SUKHPAL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Vyas, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Ajay Kumar, P.S. Kashmere Gate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 The present proceedings are instituted challenging the impugned order dated 14.09.2016, passed by ASJ (Central), Delhi arising out of CA No.whereby while dismissing the appeal, the court upheld the order dated 28.05.2016 and order on sentence dated 13.07.2016 convicting the appellant for an offence punishable under Section 279/304-A IPC. For the offence under section 304A IPC, the revisionist was directed to undergo SI for two years with a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default thereof to undergo SI for a period of one month and for the offence under section 279 IPC, the revisioni...
Sh. Birju vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 19, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4010/2019 SH. BIRJU Through: Dr. M.K. Gahlaut, Advocate. ........ Petitioner Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Vikas. Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.47/2015, under Section 308 of IPC, registered at Police Station Khyala, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 8th August, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, who is present in Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by SI Vikas, on the basis of identity proof produced by him. CRL.M.C. 4010/2019 Page 1 of ...
M/S Design Decisions Inc thr.anil Kumar vs.yogesh Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :19. 08.2019 + LPA222019 M/S DESIGN DECISIONS INC THR.ANIL KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Arora and Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocates versus YOGESH ARORA Through: Mr. Satish Kumar Tripathi, Advocate with respondent in person. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. Typographical error in the order dated 22.07.2019, wherein the date has been wrongly mentioned as 09.08.2019 is corrected and shall be read as 19.08.2019.2. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 03.10.2018, by which the appellant had challenged the Award dated 09.10.2017, passed by the learned Labour Court. Challenge is also laid to an order dated 05.12.2018 passed in the Review Petition filed by the appellant herein.3. The respondent was employed with the appellant as an Assistant architect since the year 1988. The consistent stand of the appellant has LPA No....
Prg Consultants Private Limited vs.principal Commissioner of Income Ta ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h July, 2019 Decided on:19. h August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6054/2017 ROHIT KUMAR GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. C.S. Aggarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gautam Jain, Mr. Madhur Aggarwal, Mr. Uma Shankar and Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL -II, NEW DELHI & ANR. + W.P.(C) 6060/2017 PRG CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Piyush Goyal, Advocate. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. C. S. Aggarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gautam Jain, Mr. Madhur Aggarwal, Mr.Uma Shankar and Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocates. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-II, NEW DELHI & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr.Piyush Goyal, Advocate. WP(C) 6054/2017 & 6060/2017 Page 1 of 40 CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: JUDGMENT1 An inter...
Gopal vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h August, 2019 Decided on:19. h August, 2019 CRL.A. 210/2019 GOPAL Represented by: Ms. Supriya Juneja, Advocate ..... Appellant versus (DHCLSC) THE STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal, Gopal challenges the impugned judgment dated 16th October 2018 convicting him for the offence punishable under Sections 323/452/326-B IPC in FIR No.184/2017 registered at PS Sultan Puri and the order on sentence dated 18th October 2018 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months for the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and six months and to pay a fine of `10,000/- and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month for the offence punishable under Section 452 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine...
Ajay Kumar Goel vs.central Bureau of Invesigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 19, 2019 CRL. A. 1256/2014 & CRL.M.A. 13992/2014 S K BHATIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Mr. Sermon Rawat, Mr. Parikshit Goyal and Ms. Aastha Vishwakarma, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Special Public CRL. A. 1136/2014 Prosecutor with Mr. Indranil Mohan, Advocate AJAY KUMAR GOEL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.A. Hashmi, Mr. Zeeshan Hashmi & Mr. I.A. Alwi, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor CRL. A. 1193/2014 S. S. SANAN Through: Mr. Gagan Manocha, ..... Appellant Crl.A.1256/2014 Crl.A.1136/2014 Crl.A.1193/2014 Page 1 of 7 Mr. Kushdeep Gaur, Mr. Nikhil Ahuja & Mr. R. Tyagi, Advocates Versus THE STATE (through C B I) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Special Public Prosecutor CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER In the above captioned three appeals...
Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Goswami vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 19, 2019 + CRL.A. 800/2019 ANSHUL YADAV ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurang Gupta & Mr. Tez Yadav, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Indronil Mohan, Advocate & with Mr. Raj Saurabh, Inspector + CRL.A. 849/2019 RAKESH KUMAR @ RAKESH GOSWAMI .....Appellant Through: Mr. G. Sivabalamurgan, Mr. Deepak Sharma& Mr. Anis Mohd., Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Indronil Mohan & Ms. Santwana, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER Crl.A. 800/2019 Crl.A. 849/2019 Page 1 of 3 Crl.M.(B) 1304/2019 in CRL.A. 800/2019 Crl.M.(B) 1285/2019 in CRL.A. 849/2019 Vide impugned judgment, applicants/appellants - Anshul Yadav and Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Goswami have been convicted for the offence under Section 1...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »