Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajan Kumar Anand & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 20, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3684/2019 RAJAN KUMAR ANAND & ANR. Through: Mr. Sumesh Gandhi, Advocate .....Petitioners versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor with SI Nasib Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.32314/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3684/2019 Quashing of FIR No.270/2015 under Sections 420/384/406/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Inderpuri, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 7th June, 2019 and affidavit of 29th July, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the disputes which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands settled between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has bee...
Sanjay Gupta & Anr. Vs.election Commission of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~J * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EL.PET. 4/2019 Judgment Reserved on:09. 08.2019 Judgment Pronounced on:20. 08.2019 SANJAY GUPTA & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Anil K. Aggarwal and Prof.Madan Mohan, Advs. versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Mr.Sidhant Kumar, Adv. for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.P.R.Chopra, Adv. 2/Returning Officer. for R- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.10001/2019 1. This application is filed by respondents No.1 and 2 under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC read with section 82 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 for striking out the names of the applicants/respondents No.1 and 2 i.e. the Election Commission of India and The Returning Officer, West Delhi 06 Parliamentary Constituency from the array of parties.2. The present petition is filed by the petitioner under section 80A of The Representation of People Act, 1951 seeking to set aside the entire process and conduct of elections by respondents No.1 and 2 fo...
Novartis Ag & Anr. Vs.natco Pharma Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~34 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h August, 2019 CS (COMM) 229/2019 and I.As. 11304/2019, 11305/2019 NOVARTIS AG & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Ms. Mamta Jha, Mr. Ankit Arvind, Mr. Rohan Krishnan & Dr. Shilpa Arora, Advocates (M:98736. 3089) Versus NATCO PHARMA LIMITED ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rajeshwari H., Mr. Swapnil Gaur and Mr. Kumar Chitranshu, Advocates (M:98979. 5254). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The Defendant has filed two applications one under Order VII, Rule 1. 11 CPC and the second one under Order XXXIX, Rule 4 CPC seeking dismissal of the present suit and vacation/suspension of the interim injunction operating in the present case on the ground that the patent granted in favour of the Plaintiffs has been revoked in the post grant opposition proceedings. The Defendant relies on the order passed by the Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs...
Indian Style Wrestling Association of India and Anr. Vs.wrestling Fede ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~OS-25 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. 08.2019 CS(COMM) 1303/2018 INDIAN STYLE WRESTLING ASSOCIATION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Ashutosh Kumar and Mr.Palash Maheshwari, Advs. versus WRESTLING FEDERATION OF INDIA ..... Defendant Through Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) OA No.89/2019 and IA No.11193/2019 1. This OA No.89/2019 is filed by the defendant under Rule 5 of Chapter II read with Rules 14 and 16 of Chapter I of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules 2018 against the order/judgment dated 15.07.2019 passed by the learned Joint Registrar in IA No.6721/2019.2. By the impugned order the learned Joint Registrar dismissed the application i.e. IA No.6721/2019 for condonation of delay in filing the written statement. The learned Joint Registrar noted that the defendant is seeking condonation of delay of 83 days in filing the written statement. As per the CPC, it was noted, t...
Gunjan Sharma vs.commissioner of Customs (Preventive)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CUSAA1282018 GUNJAN SHARMA ..... Appellant Through Ms. Reena Rawat and Mr. Piyush Kumar, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel. % Date of Decision:20. h August, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present appeal has been filed under Section 130 of the Customs Act challenging the final order No.C/A/55930/2017-CU(DB) dated 18th August, 2017 passed by the learned Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in Custom Appeal No.C/56324/2013, whereby it directed the Appellant the Customs House Agent, to pay reduced penalty of Rs. 15,00,000/-. CUSAA1282018 Page 1 of 7 2. The questions of law framed in this appeal are as follows:-"(i) Whether Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in imposing a penalty of Rs. 15 lakhs despite ...
Ratul Puri vs.directorate Enforcement of India, Delhi Zonal Office, Ne ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1987/2019 & Crl.M.A. 33406/2019 & Crl.M(B) 1424/2019 RATUL PURI ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. A.M.Singhvi & Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocates with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Mudit Jain, Mr. Deepanshu, Ms. Nikita Jaiswal, Mr. Shailesh Pandey, Ms. Shephalie Ailawadi & Ms. Mohini Sharma, Advocates Versus DIRECTORATE ENFORCEMENT OF INDIA, DELHI ZONAL OFFICE, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi, ASG with Mr. Zoaib Hussain & Mr. Vikas Garg, Special Counsel & Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC, Mr. Ujjwal Sinha, Mr. Pranay Lekhi, Mr. Udit Konkar & Ms. Ananya Mohan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER % 20.08.2019... Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in ECIR /15/DLZO/2014 of 3rd July, 2014, registered by respondent under Sections 3 & 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (henceforth referred to as the PMLA) while claiming to be innocent. Learned senior counsel for Bail Appln.1987/2019 Page 1 petitione...
Mukesh Thakur vs.chairman Cum Managing Director, Engineering Projects ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) 5769/2016 with CM APPLs. 16868/2017, 25771-72/2018, 4877/2019 MUKESH THAKUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K. K. Upadhyay, Adv. versus CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, ENGINEERING PROJECTS INDIA LTD. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Jagriti Ahuja and Mr. Amol Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner prays as under: (a) issue a writ of certiorari or any appropriate writ/order or direction calling for the records which led to the reduction in rank from the post of Group General Manager to General Manager and then suspension order by changing his headquarter from Jammu to Kolkata and thereafter issuance of article of charges dated 10.12.2014 and on consideration of the submissions made in the present writ petition, the same be quashed. W.P.(C) 5769/2016 Page 1 of 13 (b) set aside the order of reduction in rank. (c) issu...
Magnum Internatonal Trading Company Pvt Ltd vs.vikas Dhawan & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 08.2019 LPA4832019 MAGNUM INTERNATONAL TRADING COMPANY PVT LTD Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Debesh Panda & Ms. Akriti Kataria, Advs. ..... Appellant versus VIKAS DHAWAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyabrata Panda & Ms. Kreeti Joshi, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Vikas Dhawan, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CAV7382019 Since learned counsel for the caveator respondent No.1 is present, caveat stands discharged. CM APPL.33251/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. LPA483/2019 1. This appellant is the original petitioner in W.P.(C) 7637/2019 which is pending before the learned Single Judge. LPA4832019 Page 1 of 3 2. This appellant (original petitioner) was in search of a stay order against an order passed by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafte...
Rajeev Agarwal vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:02. 07.2019 Pronounced on:20. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) 89/2019 & CM APPLs. 486/2019 & 14962/2019 RAJEEV AGARWAL Through: Mr. Raj Kishor ........ Petitioner Choudhary, Mr.Shakeel Ahmed, Mr. Anupam Bhati and Mr. Nukul Chaudhary, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocate for R-1 to R-3/UOI Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shishir Prakash, Mr. Vijay M. Chauhan and Ms. Karuna Krishan Thareja, Advocates for R-4 to R-6 Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Mr. Amit Kumar and Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks mandamus for quashing of ex-parte report of Inquiry Committee dated 18.12.2018 and charge-sheet dated 21.08.2018 issued to the petitioner and further seeks direction to the W.P.(C) 89/2019 Page 1 of 46 respondents to hold CBI/CVC Inquiry against the respondent...
M/S Sai Motors & Anr vs.aditya Jain & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"20.08.2019 + RFA3622019 & CM No.18975/2019 (for stay) M/S SAI MOTORS & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Arvind Kr. Shukla, Mr.Kunal Yadav, Ms.Jyotsna Mehta & Mr.Sandeep Kumar, Advs. versus ADITYA JAIN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sandeep Agarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Abhishek Aggarwal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 assails the judgment and decree dated 03.01.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge No.12, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi in Civil Suit No.96whereunder a decree for possession in respect of suit property comprising of half portion of the Ground Floor and the entire mezzanine floor of property No.2704, Lothian Road, Kashmere Gate, New Delhi (suit property for short) has been passed in favour of the respondent nos.1 and 2.2. Shri Viren...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »