Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Roshan Lal Tikoo vs.commissioner of Police & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 08.2019 LPA2902019 ROSHAN LAL TIKOO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Nishit Kush & Ms. Asma Mubeen, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, SC with Mr.Ankur Chibbar & Mr. Ishan Agrawal, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. The challenge in this appeal is a notice issued by the respondent No.1 dated 25th March, 2019 which is an eviction notice upon the appellant (original petitioner). Learned counsel for the appellant suggests that this appeal could be disposed of, with a direction to the respondent to decide the show cause notice dated 27th March, 2019 issued by respondent No.1 in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policy applicable to the facts of the present case after considering the decision rendered by Division Bench of this Cou...
Anguri Sagar vs.m/s Nbcc Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~ * % + RSA842019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on:20. h August, 2019 ANGURI SAGAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Abdul Sattar, Mr.Dhananjay and Mr.Gaurav Adhana, Rai Advocates versus M/S NBCC LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.CM APPL No.19027/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. RSA842019 & CM APPL No.19025/2019 1. This appeal is against the judgment dated 06.09.2016 passed in civil suit No.5by learned Civil Judge and also against judgment dated 18.12.2018 passed by learned Additional Senior Civil Judge in RCA No.28/2016. The brief facts are as under : (i) The plaintiff has stated that she is priestess of Prachin Hanuman & Mata Mandir which is an ancient temple situated behind C-2/55, Moti Bagh Part-i, New Delhi (now known as in front of B-12, New Moti Bagh-1, New Delhi). (ii) That the local residents performed the worship of various RSA No.84/201...
M/S. Ge Engine Services Distribution Llc vs.the Deputy Commissioner of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~33 to 36 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5577/2018 and CM APPL. 21731/2018 (stay) + + GE ENERGY PARTS INC Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates ........ Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior standing counsel for Revenue W.P.(C) 5580/2018 and CM APPL. 21735/2018 (stay) M/s. NUOVO PIGNONE Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Versus Bhatia, Advocates ........ Petitioner THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sagar Suri, Standing counsel & Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Senior standing counsel for Income Tax Department W.P.(C) 5603/2018 and CM APPL. 21868/2018 (stay) M/s. GE JAPAN LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates Versus W.P.(C) 5577/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 16 + THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sagar Suri, Standing counsel & Ms. Lakshmi Guru...
Improve Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd vs.vva Developers (P) Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 67/2018 % Date of decision:20. 8.2019 IMPROVE VYAPAAR PVT. LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vikas Arora, Ms. Radhika Arora and Mr. Rishabh Agnihotri, Advs. VVA DEVELOPERS (P) LTD & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Apoorv Agarwal and Ms. Megha Choubey, Advs. Mr. Vinod Tyagi, Adv. for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short '1996 Act'). The challenge in this petition is made qua the award dated 6.11.2017.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the challenge to the award is limited in nature and, for this purpose, has referred me to the substantive prayers made in the petition.3. For the sake of convenience, the same are extracted hereafter: (a) allow the present petition and consequently set aside the Award dated 06.11.2017 passed by Justice R.C. Jain (Retd.)learned So...
Bharat Bhushan (Father in Law) & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"20th August, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 2308/2019 BHARAT BHUSHAN (FATHER IN LAW) & ORS Through: Mr. Rajendra Jha & Mr. ........ Petitioners Birendra Prasad Singh, Advs. with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with ASI Virendra Prakash, PS Gandhi Nagar. Mr. J.L. Bahl, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to Hitesh as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 13.07.2005. From out of the said wedlock, two children were born, a boy namely Shreyansh and a girl child named Bhavya, who are in the care and custody of the first and second petitioners (grandparents). The marriage ran into rough weather during the lifetime of the husband, the second respondent raising allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and harassment for and on account of demand of dowry. Her husband passed away on 19.10.2015. However,...
P. Chidambaram vs.directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h March, 2019 Pronounced on:20. h August, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 1316/2018 & Crl. M. A. 10976/2018 P. CHIDAMBARAM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibbal Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr. Dayan Krishnan and Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocates with Mr. P. K. Dubey, Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Mr. Adit Pujari, Mr. Amit Bhandari, Mr. Akshat Gupta, Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Mr. AyushAgarwal, Ms. Ishita Garg, Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri & Mr. Harpreet Kalsi, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General with Mr. K. M. Natraj, Additional Solicitor General and Mr. Amit Mahajan, Central Government Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajat Nair, Advocate And BAIL APPLN. 1713/2018 & Crl. M. (B) 1163/2018 P. CHIDAMBARAM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibbal Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr. Dayan Krishnan and Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocates with Mr. P. K. Dubey, Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Mr. Bail Appl...
M/S. Nuovo Pignone vs.the Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~33 to 36 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5577/2018 and CM APPL. 21731/2018 (stay) + + GE ENERGY PARTS INC Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates ........ Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior standing counsel for Revenue W.P.(C) 5580/2018 and CM APPL. 21735/2018 (stay) M/s. NUOVO PIGNONE Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Versus Bhatia, Advocates ........ Petitioner THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sagar Suri, Standing counsel & Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Senior standing counsel for Income Tax Department W.P.(C) 5603/2018 and CM APPL. 21868/2018 (stay) M/s. GE JAPAN LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates Versus W.P.(C) 5577/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 16 + THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sagar Suri, Standing counsel & Ms. Lakshmi Guru...
Manisha Priyadarshini vs.sri Aurobindo College – Evening & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20.08.2019 + W.P.(C) 8518/2019 with CM APPLs. 37171/2019, 35150-51/2019 MANISHA PRIYADARSHINI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Prerna Priyadarshini, Mr. Kush and Ms. Priyashree Chaturvedi Sharma, Advs. versus SRI AUROBINDO COLLEGE EVENING & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajinder Dhawan and Mr. B.S. Rana, Advs. for R-1 & 2 Mr. Mohinder J S Rupal, Ms. Aditi Shastri and Mr. Prang Newmai, Advs. for University of Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions thereby quashing the impugned letter of termination dated 29.05.2019 issued by the respondent No.1-college and direct the respondent No.1 to reinstate the petitioner to the post of Assistant Professor on Ad-hoc basis from 20.03.2019. WP (C) 8518/2019 Page 1 of 5 2. Case of the petitioner is that he has been employed by the University of Delhi on Ad-hoc basis since 2013. She has compl...
Tushar Ranjan Mohanty vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~06. * + % W.P.(C) 3257/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 08.2019. TUSHAR RANJAN MOHANTY ........ Petitioner Through:... Petitioner in person. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha with Mr. A.S. Singh and Mr. Amit Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner assails the order dated 22.03.2018, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.4603/2017. The Tribunal has rejected the said Original Application, wherein he had challenged his suspension vide order dated 19.12.2017 in exercise of power under Rule 10(1) of the CCS (CCA) Rules in contemplation of a disciplinary proceeding for a period of 90 days.2. The charge on which the Disciplinary Proceedings were contemplated is set out in the show cause notice issued to the petitioner. The show cause notice dated 08.01.2018 reads as follows: W....
Vedanta Ltd. (Successor of Sterlite Industries (India) Limited) vs.ass ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~48 * + Through: versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11541/2017 & CM Appl.No.47020/2017 (stay) VEDANTA LTD. (SUCCESSOR OF STERLITE INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LIMITED) ........ Petitioner Mr.Sachit Jolly and Mr.Aarush Bhatia, Advocates. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-26 (1), NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Vibhooti Malhotra, Senior Standing Counsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar J.: ORDER2008.2019 1. This is a writ petition challenging the notice dated 31st March, 2017, issued by the Respondent, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 26 (1), New Delhi (hereafter, the Assessing Officer) (AO) seeking to reopen the assessment of the... Petitioner for Assessment Year (AY) 2010-2011 under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).2. The background facts as stated in the petition are that the erstwhile Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd., which stands amalgamated with Sesa Sterlite Ltd., and now known as Vedanta ...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »