Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Kumar Kathuria vs.state (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 853/2019 Judgment delivered on:21. 08.2019 RAJ KUMAR KATHURIA STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Tribhuwen Kumar Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Juli Mr. Avinash, Adv. for complainant CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.2/2019 under Sections 354/354A/354B/3IPC, Police Station Gandhi Nagar.2. Allegations against the petitioner by the prosecutrix are that she is an owner of a particular shop and there is a dispute with the petitioner. She got information that some person had come to break open the lock of her shop. When she reached the spot, she found the petitioner there along with his brother with tools for breaking the lock and when she objected, it is alleged that they assaulted her and even BA...
Mohsina vs.bajaj Alliance Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:21. 08.2019 MAC.APP. 1017/2018 & CM No.47995/2018 Versus MOHSINA $~13 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate. ..... Appellant BAJAJ ALLIANCE GEN INS CO LTD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A. K. Soni, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Rakesh Dahiya, Advocate for Respondent No.2. The award of compensation dated 31.08.2017 directing payment of the same by the owner of the vehicle i.e. respondent No.2 is impugned on two grounds. Firstly, that as per section 147(1)(b)(i) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (MV Act), the insurance policy is required to cover any liability which may be incurred by him in respect of the death of or bodily injury to any person or damage to any property of a third party 2. In the present case, the deceased Rahis was the owner of the goods - two buffaloes, which were being carried in the insured vehicle. The MAC.APP. No.1017-2018 Page 1 of ...
Ht Media Limited vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8239/2015 & CM APPL. 17287/2015 (stay) % 1. HT MEDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Adv. with Ms. Meghna Mishra, Mr. Ankit Rajganhia, Ms.Riya and Mr. Raghav Kacker, Advs. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD Mr. Ashwin Vaish and Mr. Kunal Awana, Advs. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT2008.2019 The petitioner in this writ petition, M/s. H. T. Media Ltd, claims to be aggrieved by an Order, dated 30th June, 2015, issued by the Deputy Labour Commissioner, New Delhi District, the size of the powers conferred, upon him, by Sections 10(1)(c) and 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the ID Act), referring the following dispute, to the Labour Court, for adjudication: Whether services of Sh. Purshottam Singh, s/o late Sh. Ram Baksh Singh have been the management illegally and/or unjustifiably,...
M/S. Ge Japan Ltd. Vs.the Commissioner of Income Tax-1 & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~33 to 36 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5577/2018 and CM APPL. 21731/2018 (stay) + + GE ENERGY PARTS INC Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates ........ Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior standing counsel for Revenue W.P.(C) 5580/2018 and CM APPL. 21735/2018 (stay) M/s. NUOVO PIGNONE Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Versus Bhatia, Advocates ........ Petitioner THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sagar Suri, Standing counsel & Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Senior standing counsel for Income Tax Department W.P.(C) 5603/2018 and CM APPL. 21868/2018 (stay) M/s. GE JAPAN LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates Versus W.P.(C) 5577/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 16 + THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sagar Suri, Standing counsel & Ms. Lakshmi Guru...
Sh. Girish Chand and Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~53 * + Date of Decision:20. 8.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.8985/2019 ........ Petitioners SH. GIRISH CHAND AND ORS. Through: Mr. Sunil Bansal, Mr. Amit Anand and Mr. Ramesh Shukla, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gigi George, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr. Anshuman, Adv. (GP) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM No.37069/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 8985/2019 & CM No.37068/2019 1. Issue notice. Counsel for the respondents accepts notice. We have heard learned counsels and proceed to dispose of the writ petition.2. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 19.7.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. 2110/2019 against the orders dated W.P.(C.) No.8985/2019 Page 1 of 5 23.5.2019 and 2.7.2019 passed b...
Vijay @ Balkhan vs.state of Delh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~ 25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. Appeal No.911/2002 Decided on:-"20th August, 2019 VIJAY @ BALKHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms. Ekta Vats, Mr.Anuj Singh, Mr. Dinhar Takiar, Mr. Sankalp Kohli Mr. Sarthak Garg, Advs. versus STATE OF DELH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Vainay, PS Anand Parbat. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGEMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant herein was put on trial, along with one Bishan Kumar, on charge for offence under Section 307 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) in sessions case No.39/1999 registered on the basis of report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) which was submitted upon conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.345/1997 of police station Anand Parbat. The gravamen of the charge essentially was of attempt to commit murder of Krishna Devi (PW-6) in the early morning hours at 4.3...
Shekhar Garg @ Shekhar vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1940/2019 Judgment delivered on:20. 08.2019 SHEKHAR GARG @ SHEKHAR versus THE STATE ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Gaurav Kochar with Mr. Dollar Jain, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with the Investigating Officer. Mr. Ashok K. Singh with Ms. Sonakshi Monga and Mr. Sandeep K. Bhardwaj, Advocates for complainant with complainant in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.167/2019 under SectionsIPC, Police Station Geeta Colony.2. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant came in contact with the petitioner in first half of the year 2017 when she received a Facebook request from him. It is alleged that she was initially not interested however when he continued to pressurize her, she accepted BAIL APPLN. 1940/2019 Page 1 of ...
Ge Energy Parts Inc vs.the Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~33 to 36 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5577/2018 and CM APPL. 21731/2018 (stay) + + GE ENERGY PARTS INC Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates ........ Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Senior standing counsel for Revenue W.P.(C) 5580/2018 and CM APPL. 21735/2018 (stay) M/s. NUOVO PIGNONE Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Versus Bhatia, Advocates ........ Petitioner THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sagar Suri, Standing counsel & Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Senior standing counsel for Income Tax Department W.P.(C) 5603/2018 and CM APPL. 21868/2018 (stay) M/s. GE JAPAN LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates Versus W.P.(C) 5577/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 16 + THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sagar Suri, Standing counsel & Ms. Lakshmi Guru...
P. Chidambaram vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h March, 2019 Pronounced on:20. h August, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 1316/2018 & Crl. M. A. 10976/2018 P. CHIDAMBARAM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibbal Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr. Dayan Krishnan and Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocates with Mr. P. K. Dubey, Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Mr. Adit Pujari, Mr. Amit Bhandari, Mr. Akshat Gupta, Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Mr. AyushAgarwal, Ms. Ishita Garg, Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri & Mr. Harpreet Kalsi, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General with Mr. K. M. Natraj, Additional Solicitor General and Mr. Amit Mahajan, Central Government Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajat Nair, Advocate And BAIL APPLN. 1713/2018 & Crl. M. (B) 1163/2018 P. CHIDAMBARAM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibbal Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr. Dayan Krishnan and Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocates with Mr. P. K. Dubey, Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Mr. Bail Appl...
Suneel Tyagi vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2019
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) 3946/2018 & CM APPL. 15605/2018 SUNEEL TYAGI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Vishwendra Verma, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Gigi C. George, Adv. with Mr.R.M. Tripathi, Adv. for R-1, 2 & 4. Mr.Naveen Chawla, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present application, the petitioner seeks direction thereby setting aside the order No.3-IWAI/Estt/3/2015/Part dated 23.03.2018 issued by the respondent No.3 and to treat the vacancy reserved for persons with locomotor disability. Further seeks direction thereby directing the respondents nos.1 to 3 to consider the petitioner for appointment to the post of Assistant Hydrographic Surveyor in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in the advertisement published by respondent no.3 vide W.P.(C) 3946/2018 Page 1 of 10 their advertisement dated 04.10.2016 and if selected...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »