Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Fakruddin & Others vs.mohd Nabi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2019
$~21 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on :21. t August, 2019 RSA932019, CM APPL.No.20493/2019 FAKRUDDIN & OTHERS ..... Appellants Through : Mr.R.K.Sharma, Advocate. versus MOHD NABI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Sonal Sinha, Advocate for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The respondent No.1/plaintiff filed a civil suit bearing No.134/2010 on 03.06.1988 for recovery of possession of terrace on the second floor of property bearing No.747, Phatak Dhobian, Farsh Khana, Delhi110006 and also for mesne profits against the petitioners. The respondent No.1 claim to be an owner of said portion.2. It was alleged petitioner No.4 - Mohammad Deen was a tenant in respect of two rooms, one kothari, courtyard, kitchen, bathroom, latrine at the first floor and barsati on the second floor. The terrace is separate to barsati on the second floor. The respondent No.1/ plaintiff alleges to be in occupation of terrace viz a portion admeasuring 17...
Ajay Kumar Tiwari & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 21, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4081/2019 & CRL.M.A. 33816/2019 AJAY KUMAR TIWARI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, Standing Counsel (DHCLSC). Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Ram Kishan & ASI Rajvirender. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.279/2018, under Section 498-A/4of IPC, registered Police Station Bhalswa Dairy (North West), Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 4th February, 2019 reached between the parties and affidavit of 22nd July, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Ram Kishan on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 4081/2019 Pa...
Mvr Industry Ltd vs.tribal Cooperative Marketing Development Federatio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2019
$~40. * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. 08.2019 FAO(OS) 159/2019 MVR INDUSTRY LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.I. Jose, Mr. N. Ramakrishnan & Mr. Kunal Manav, Advocates. TRIBAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING DEVELOPMENT FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD..... Respondent versus Through: Mr. Buddy A. Ranganadhan & Ms.Aditi Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Caveat No.834/2019 1.2. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1/ caveator has appeared. Accordingly, the caveat stands discharged. C.M. No.37310/2019 3.4. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) 159/2019 and C.M. No.37311/2019 (to seek condonation of 100 days delay in filing the appeal) 5. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. FAO(OS) 159/2019 Page 1 of 7 6. The appellant has preferred the present appeal to assail the order dated 25.03.2019 passed by the learned Single Ju...
Central Bureau of Investigation vs.suresh Kumar Garg & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2019
$~ 5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C. 1686/2016 Decided on:-"21st August, 2019 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj with DSP Prabhat Jamwal, (IO) versus SURESH KUMAR GARG & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv K. Garg, Mr. Ashish Garg & Mr. Govind Singh, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the basis of report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) submitted by the petitioner Central Bureau of Investigation upon conclusion of its investigation into first information report (FIR) RC No.BD.1/2015/E/0009, CBI, BS & FC, New Delhi seeking prosecution of the respondents herein (accused persons), the Special Judge by his order passed on 02.02.2016, while taking cognizance for offences under Sections 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (c) & (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 declined to take cognizance for o...
Union of India vs.m/s. Vidarbha Industries Power Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2019
$~ * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA1692018 Judgment reserved on :22. 05.2019 Judgment pronounced on :21. .08.2019 COAL INDIA LIMITED ..... Appellant versus M/S. VIDARBHA INDUSTRIES POWER LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS LPA1732018 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant versus M/S. VIDARBHA INDUSTRIES POWER LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Present : Mr. Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karan Singh Bhati, Mr. Hemedra Sharma & Mr. Kartikeya Vajpai, Advocates for Coal India Limited. Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr.Sahil Sood, Ms.Shruti Dutt, Mr.Harshul Chaudhary, Mr.Pradeep Dhanda and Mr.Viplav Acharya, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Aanchal Mullick, Mr. Pradeep Chhindra & Mr. Parinay Vasandani, Advocates for VIPL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH LPA Nos.169/2018 & 173/2018 Page 1 of 32 JYOTI SINGH, J.1. Since both these appeals have been filed challengin...
Gaurav @ Golu vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 21, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4085/2019 & CRL.M.A. 33831/2019 GAURAV @ GOLU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahavir Singh & Mr. Dipesh Choudhary, Advocates. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for State with W/SI Usha. Mr. Sachin Jangir, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.180/2013, under Sections 323/354/354(D)/509 of IPC, registered at Police Station Mandir Marg, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 1st August, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, who is present in Court, is the complainants of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by W/SI Usha, on the basis of i...
Babli @ Shakuntla Devi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2019
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 08.2019 CRL.A. 750/2018 & Crl.M.B.1144/2018 & Crl.M.A.49062/2018 BABLI @ SHAKUNTLA DEVI ..... Appellant versus STATE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Javed Alvi, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. Mr.Rajesh Sharma, Adv. for R-2 with Respondent No.2/Complainant in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellant impugns judgment dated 16.05.2018 and order on sentence dated 24.05.2018 whereby appellant has been convicted of an offence under Section 3IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.1 lakh and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for a period of six months.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the appellant along with her son had a fight with the victim. The role ascribed to the appellant was that she caught hold of the victi...
Sunder Lal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2019
# IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On :04. 07.2019 Judgment Pronounced On :21. 08.2019 CRL.A.909/2001 SUNDER LAL . Appellant versus STATE .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Akshay Chandra, Advocate : Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal instituted under the provision of section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C) assails the judgment dated 21.9.2001 and the order on sentence dated 24.9.2001, rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari, Delhi, in Session Case No.121/1997, titled as State vs. Munna & Ors, emanating from F.I.R No.222/1997 under section 3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to CRL.A.909/2001 Page 1 of 20 as IPC) registered at Police Station Jahangirpuri; whereby the appellant, Sunder Lal, was convi...
Om Pal Singh vs.l.i.c. Of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2019
$~8 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 4913/2015 OM PAL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Lal Singh, Mr.Sudhir Tewatia, Advocates versus L.I.C. OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Soumyajit Pani, Advocate for respondent No.1/LIC Mr.Rajesh Gogna, CGSC for UOI/respondent with Mr.Kamaldeep and Mr.P. Upendra Sai, Advocates No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the award of the Industrial Tribunal 1. whereby his statement of claim has been dismissed.2. The petitioner was engaged by the respondent as peon on 16th December, 1996 for 85 days. However, he continued to work thereafter. According to the petitioner, he continuously worked for 280 days whereas according to the respondent, he worked less than 240 days. The petitioner claimed regularization on 28th January, 1998 whereupon the respondent dispensed with his services w.e.f. 04th February, 1998.3. The petitioner raised an i...
Shri Sudhir Kumar Gupta Through Lrs) vs.dr. Indra Chand Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2019
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on: February 07, 2019 Pronounced on: August 21, 2019 RFA1881982 & CM Nos. 1888/1993, 3709/2007, 15551/2010, 7007/2011 & 4360/2007 SHRI SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA THROUGH LRs) .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ashwin Vaish, Amicus Curiae, Mr.Vinod Pandey & Mr. Kunal Awana, Advocates Versus DR. INDRA CHAND JAIN Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, ....Respondent Mr. Shivansh Soni & Mrs. Deepika Mishra, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Vivek Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Asim Shridhal & Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocates in CM No.4360/2007. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT Vide impugned judgment of 29th April, 1982 suit for specific performance of Agreement to Sell (Exhibit PW-4/1) pertaining to right and interest of appellant in respect of 1/8th share in Kothi No.1 Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as suit property) stands decreed against appellant. RFA1881982 Page 1 of 13 The operative paragraph of the impugned judgment reads as under:-"I...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »