Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajat Varshney vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$~43 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30. h August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9472/2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Saurabh Ahuja, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS RAJAT VARSHNEY UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Ms.Bharati Raju, CGSC for R-1/UOI. Mr.Naresh Kaushik and Ms.Vibhuti Tyagi, Advts. for UPSC/R-2. Mr.Shadan Farasat, Ms.Warisha Farasat and Ms.Rudrakshi Deo, Advts. for R-3/caveator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM. APPL389602019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CAVEAT NO.872/2019 3. Counsel for the caveat enters appearance. Accordingly, the caveat stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 9472/2019 4. With consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing and disposal.5. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 05.08.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal), by which O.A. filed by responde...
State vs.kaishar Ali
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 188/2018 STATE KAISHAR ALI Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State ........ Petitioner with Insp. Josepha Kujur, P.S. Defence Colony. versus Through Mr. Brajraj Singh Chauhan, Proxy ..... Respondent Counsel Reserved on :21. t August, 2019 Date of Decision:30. h August, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL MANMOHAN, J: JUDGMENT1 Present criminal leave petition has been filed on behalf of the State challenging the judgment/order of acquittal dated 22nd November, 2017 passed by Additional Sessions Judge-01-Cum Special Court (POCSO), South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in FIR No.140/2015 under Sections 376/366/363 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act registered with Police Station Defence Colony. CRL. L.P. 188/2018 Page 1 of 12 2. The Trial Court in the impugned judgment while acquitting respondent-accused held as under:-"16. In the present case the complaint was filed by father...
Delhi State Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. Vs.sh.badan Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$~5 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. h August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1632/2010 DELHI STATE CIVIL SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD. Through: Ms. Anju Bhattacharya, Ms. Nandita Chandra, Mr. Elgin Matt John, Ms. Deepika Kumari, Advocates with Mr. Gaur, AR for company. ........ Petitioner 1. versus SH.BADAN SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.P. Singh Parihar, Advocate with Mr. Mohan Lal Verma, LR of respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby reinstatement with 40% back wages was awarded to the respondent.2. The petitioner engaged the respondent on daily wages on 08th September, 1987. In December, 1989, the respondent deposited deficient sale proceeds of Rs.8,483.23; in February, 1990, the respondent deposited deficient sale proceeds of Rs.13,394.37; in March, 1990, the respondent deposited deficient sale proceeds of Rs.7,590.90; and in April, 1990, the respondent deposited deficient...
Icp Investments (Mauritius) Ltd vs.uppal Housing Pvt. Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h August, 2019 CS(COMM) 1079/2018 & IA No.17779/2018 (u/O VII R- 11(a)&(d) CPC) ICP INVESTMENTS (MAURITIUS) LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pranav Vyas with Mr. Parinay T. Versus Vasandani, Advs. UPPAL HOUSING PVT. LTD. & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Manoj K. Singh with Ms. Nilava Bandyopadhyay, Ms. Vijaya Singh & Mr. Satwik Singh, Advs. for D-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit against defendants no.1 to 5, viz. (i) Uppal Housing Pvt. Ltd., (ii) Mangalmay Holdings Pvt. Ltd., (iii) Manoj Talwar, (iv) Jitendra Singh, and, (v) Umang Realtech Pvt. Ltd., for (A) declaration, that (a) the Agreement dated 27th March, 2009 entered between defendant no.5 Umang Realtech Pvt. Ltd. (Umang) and defendant no.1 Uppal Housing Pvt. Ltd. (Uppal) with respect to property at Paprawat is void, having been brought about by fraudulent misrepresentation by Uppal to Umang; (b) the Agr...
Gouri Devi Institute of Medical Sciences & Hospital vs.union of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) 6898/2019 & CM APPL. 28680/2019. Judgment reserved on :13. 08.2019 Date of decision :30. 08.2019 GOURI DEVI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & HOSPITAL ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Vivek Sarin, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anshuman Sharma, Mr. Shivanshu Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Kamal Deep, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advs. for MCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner institute vide the present petition seeks the quashing of the impugned order dated 18.05.2019 passed by the respondent no.2, the Board of Governors in supersession of the MCI, vide which the permission sought by the petitioner for renewal for the 4th Batch (150 MBBS students) for the petitioners institute situated at Kolkata, West Bengal under Section 10A of the Indian Medical...
g.p. Muthu & Ors vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 08.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4867/2017 G.P. MUTHU & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rakesh Wadhwa, Adv. with Ms.Prarthana Singh, Adv. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.M.S. Oberoi, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby setting aside Order dated 29.09.2016 passed by the learned ASJ-02/FTC, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, in Criminal Revision Petition No.81/2016, in FIR No.318/2015 dated 26.10.2015, registered in Inder Puri Police Station, New Delhi and all the consequential/incidental proceedings arising therefrom.2. The case of the petitioner is that the aforesaid FIR was registered against the petitioners on the basis of complaint lodged by Respondent No.2 herein. In the said FIR, it is alleged by the Respondent No.2 that on CRL.M.C. 4867/2017 Page 1 of 11 25.10.2015 at abou...
Gauri Shankar Shukla vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 01/2017 Reserved on:20. h August, 2019 Decided on:30. h August, 2019 GAURI SHANKAR SHUKLA STATE ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA State.1. Gauri Shankar challenges the impugned judgment dated 17th October 2016 convicting him for offence punishable under Section 10 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short POCSO Act) and the order on sentence dated 20th October 2016 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of 5,000/-, in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months.2. Assailing the conviction, Learned Counsel for the appellant contends that the prosecutrix is a tutored witness and has falsely implicated the appellant due to the landlord tenant dispute. Version of the prosecutrix is not corroborated by ...
Delhi Development Authority vs.m/s. Gillette India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA5132019 and CM353552019 (stay) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Senior Standing along with for DDA Counsel Mr.Arun Birbal, Advocate. M/s. GILLETTE INDIA LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Abhinav Vasisht, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi, Mr.Satvik Varma, Mr.Tanveer Oberoi and Ms.Priya Singh, Advocates for R Mr Abhineet Gulati, Advocate for R CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER3008.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) is directed against a judgment dated 9th May, 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of W.P.(C) No.7456/2013 filed by the Respondent Gillette India Limited (GIL). By the impugned judgment, the learned Single Judge has set aside the letter dated 15th April, 2013 read with letters dated 14th May, 2013 and 13th January, 2015 of the Appellant DDA, demanding from GIL LPA5132019 Page 1 of 10 une...
Hindustan Construction Co Ltd vs.ipex Infrastructure (P) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 207/2019 & C.M. Nos. 38809-810/2019 HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO LTD Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shruti, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus IPEX INFRASTRUCTURE (P) LTD Through: Mr. Sachin Sood and Ms. Priya Soni, Advocates. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER3008.2019 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the judgment dated 20.5.2019, passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing a petition filed by it under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short A&C Act) assailing an Award dated 08.1.2019.2. The facts of the case as set out in paras 2.1 to 3.8 of the impugned order are undisputed and are extracted below without any embellishment:-"2.1 The... Petitioner i.e. Hindustan Construction Company Limited (hereafter referred to as HCC) on 15.07.2014 entered into a Contract with Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited (in short DMRC) ...
Virender Kumar @ Bittoo vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20th August, 2019 Decided on:30. h August, 2019 CRL.A. 1103/2017 VIRENDER KUMAR @ BITTOO ..... Appellant STATE Represented by: Mr. Akshay Bhandari, Mr. and Mr. Digvijay Singh Akhilesh, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA State 1. By the present appeal, Virender Kumar @ Bittoo challenges the impugned judgment dated 6th May 2017 convicting him for the offences punishable under Sections 392/4IPC in FIR No.35/2009 registered at PS Karawal Nagar and the order on sentence dated 29th September 2016 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of 5,000/- and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year for the offence punishable under Section 392 IPC and undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years for the offence punishable under Section 411 IPC.2. Assailing the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »