Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Aug 21 2019

Shri Malkhan Singh and Ors. Vs.financial Commissioner, Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-21-2019

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:21. tAugust,2019 + W.P.(C) 6614/2014 1. SHRI MALKHAN SINGH2 SHRI CHANDER HAS3 SHRI SANJEET SEHRAWAT4 SHRI VISHAL SEHRAWAT ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Chauhan, Advocate. Versus 1. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, DELHI.2. SMT. SAVITRI DEVI3 SMT. BIMLA DEVI4 SMT. DARSHNA5 SHRI HARI SINGH6 SHRI SULTAN7 SHRI AMAN KUMAR8 SHRI AMIT KUMAR9 SHRI ANIL KUMAR ...Respondents Through: Satya Mr. B. D. Kaushik, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Yadav and Mr. Bhushan, for R-1. Mr. Advocates Sanjay Pathak, Advocate with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mrs. M. S. Akhtar, Advocates for R-5 to R-9. Kumar + W.P.(C) 6106/2015 1. SHRI HARI SINGH2 SHRI SANJEEV KUMAR W.P.(C) Nos. 6614/2014 & 6106/2015 Page 1 of 11 3. SHRI RAJEEV KUMAR4 SHRI AMAN KUMAR5 SHRI AMIT KUMAR6 SHRI ANIL KUMAR Through: ...Petitioners Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. M. S. Akhtar, Advocates. Versus 1. SMT. SA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2019

Indra Chand Jain vs.jaideep Gupta

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-21-2019

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: February 07, 2019 Pronounced on: August 21, 2019 + CONT. CAS(C) 23/2004 & CRL.M.A.8872/2004 INDRA CHAND JAIN Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw & ........ Petitioner Mr. Shivansh Soni, Advocates. Versus JAIDEEP GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashwin Vaish, Amicus Curiae, Mr.Vinod Pandey &Mr. Kunal Awana, Advocates with respondent in person. + CONT. CAS(C) 313/2005 & CRL.M.A.1459/2007 & CM19782007 DR. INDRA CHAND JAIN Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw & ........ Petitioner Mr. Shivansh Soni, Advocates. Versus PUSHPA GUPTA & ORS. Through: Mr. Ashwin Vaish, Amicus Curiae, ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Vinod Pandey & Mr. Kunal Awana, Advocates with respondent No.3 in person. Mr. A.B.Dial, Senior Advocate with Ms. Ananya Datta Majumdar, Advocate for respondents No.4 & 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CONT. CAS(C) 23/2004 & CONT. CAS(C) 313/2005 Page 1 of 6 JUDGMENT CONT. CAS(C) 23/2004, CRL.M.A.8872/2004 & CONT. CAS(C) 313/2005, CRL.M.A.145...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2019

Sangram Pal & Ors. Vs.furkan Ansari & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-21-2019

$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 748/2019 SANGRAM PAL & ORS Decided on:21. 08.2019 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate. versus FURKAN ANSARI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani and Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 37392/2019 1. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned.2. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 748/2019 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation passed by the learned MACT on 13.08.2018 in MAC Petition No.50(Old MAC Petition No.555/13) on the ground that it has erred in not granting compensation for (i) loss of consortium and (ii) loss of love and affection @ Rs. 40,000/- and Rs.50,000/- to each of the claimants in terms of the decision of the Supreme Court in Magma General MAC.APP. No.748/2019 Page 1 of 2 Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram & Ors. 2018 SCC OnLine SC15462. The position ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2019

Katyan Shikshan Samiti vs.union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-21-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P (C)No.8094/2019 and 33533/2019 and 35202/2019 Judgment reserved on :14. 08.2019 Date of decision :21. 08.2019 KATYAN SHIKSHAN SAMITI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Arjun Garg, Ms.Sana Kamra and Mr.Rahul Gupta, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. NikhilGoel, Standing Counsel, Ms.Ridhima Gaur, Adv for Union of India. Ms.Archana Pathak Dave, Adv for R-2 Mr.Aditya Ranjan, Standing Counsel for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner, Katyan Shikshan Samiti, situated at Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, seeks the setting aside of the impugned order dated 19.7.2019 issued by the respondent No.1, Government of India, Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy, i.e. AYUSH declining the grant of issuance of the letter of permission to the petitioner institute to start a new Ayurveda College in the name of Dr.Shankar Dayal Sharma Ayurvedic College ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2019

Gurdeep Singh & Ors vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-21-2019

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 21, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3672/2019 & CRL.M.A. 32283-32284/2019 GURDEEP SINGH & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Jitender Singh, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Rajender Singh. Mr. Pramod Kr. Aggarwal & Mr. Devrat Pradhan, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.604/2017, under Section 498-A/4of IPC, registered Police Station Tilak Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 31st July, 2018 reached between the parties and affidavit of 19th July, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Rajender Singh on the basis of identity proof p...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2019

Employee State Insurance Corporation vs.dr. Dinesh Kumar Yadav

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-21-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. 08.2019 $~62. * + % W.P.(C) 9050/2019 EMPLOYEE STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION........ Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Singh with Ms. Prachi Singh and Ms. Nisha Hans, Advs. versus DR. DINESH KUMAR YADAV Through: Mr. Yaspal Rangi, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.37365/2019 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CAV No.840/2019 2. Learned counsel for the respondent caveator has appeared. The caveat is, accordingly, discharged. W.P.(C) 9050/2019 & C.M. Nos. 37363, 37364/2019 3. The petitioner assails the order dated 11.01.2019 passed by the W.P.(C.) No.9050/2019 Page 1 of 5 Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.2204/2017. The Tribunal has allowed the said Original Application preferred by the respondent. In the said Original Application, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2019

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.sushila & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-21-2019

$~38 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:21. 08.2019 MAC.APP. 745/2019 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS SUSHILA & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI Through: NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) MAC.APP. 745/2019, CM APPL. 37356/2019 & CM APPL. 37357/2019 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation on the following grounds:-"(i) The compensation should not have been granted because the motorcyclist did not have a valid driving license; in other words, his ability to ride a motorcycle had not been tested by the Transport Authority. (ii) The victim was a minor, therefore, he had put not only his own life at risk but also that of the pillion rider. (iii) He was a threat to the safety and security of the other persons on the road and accidents caused by such motorcyclists or drivers are a dangerous threat to the safety of all road users and MAC.APP. No.745/2019 Page 1 of 7 such irresponsible ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2019

Vaibhav Jain vs.pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-21-2019

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t August, 2019 Decided on:21. t August, 2019 + ANKUSH JAIN W.P. (C) 6541/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Senior Advocate with Mr. P. Roy Choudhary, Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Ms. Jyotsna Mehta and Mr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Advocates. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue. + VAIBHAV JAIN W.P. (C) 6543/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Senior Advocate with Mr. P. Roy Choudhary, Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Ms. Jyotsna Mehta and Mr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Advocates. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH W.P. (C) 6541/2017 & 6543 of 2017 Page 1 of 18 % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These are two writ petitions arising out of a simila...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2019