Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sushila vs.airport Authority of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA6862017 IN THE MATTER OF: SUSHILA Reserved on:19. 08.2019 Date of decision:22. 08.2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. J.K. Mittal, Ms. Vandana Mittal and Mr. Abhishek Handa, Advocates. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Kathuria, St. Counsel (Tax) for R1/AAI. Mr. Atul Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate for R-2/DIAL. AND LPA6882017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. J.K. Mittal, Ms. Vandana Mittal and Mr. Abhishek Handa, Advocates. SUSHILA AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Kathuria, St. Counsel (Tax) for R1/AAI. Mr. Atul Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate for R-2/DIAL. LPA686& 688/2017 Page 1 of 12 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The appellant/petitioner is aggrieved by a common order dated 15.9.2017, passed in W.P. (C) Nos. 10880/2019 and 10883/2016 whereby, her ple...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs.anoop Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h July, 2019 Decided on:22. d August, 2019 ITA9272005 + COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Senior Standing Counsel and Ms Adeeba Mujahid, Junior Standing Counsel for Revenue. ANOOP JAIN versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr U.A. Rana and Mr Himanshu Mehta, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 21st February, 2005 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA Nos. 2959 & 3221/Del./1996 for the Assessment Year (AY) 1992-93.2. While admitting this appeal on 22nd August, 2007, the following question of law was framed for consideration: Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax ITA9272005 Page 1 of 21 (Appeals) deleting the addition of Rs.5,17,45,958/- ...
Devki Nandan @ Devi Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:9. h July, 2019 Decided on:22. d August, 2019 CRL.A. 743/2017 DEVKI NANDAN @ DEVI SINGH ..... Appellant STATE Represented by: Mr. Prashant Mehta, Advocate, DHCLCS versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with SI Sandeep Shrivastawa, PS Bharat Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By the present appeal, Devki Nandan @ Devi Singh challenges the impugned judgment dated 20th September 2016 convicting him for the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC in FIR No.549/2014 registered at PS Bharat Nagar and the order on sentence dated 22nd September 2016 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six years and to pay a fine of 15,000/- in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months.2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the injured S in her testimony admitted that she was sleeping at the time of incident and she coul...
New Delhi Municipal Council vs.subh Narayan Sah & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 6700/2016 & CM. APPL. 27429/2016 NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Malvika Trivedi, ASC for NDMC versus SUBH NARAYAN SAH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal, Adv. with Ms. Megha De. and Ms. Shilpa Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT2208.2019 1. This writ petition is directed against award, dated 30th September, 2015, passed by the learned Labour Court, whereby Respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred to as the respondent, for the sake of convenience) was directed to be reinstated with continuity of service and full back wages.2. The reference, dated 8th January, 1993, by the appropriate Government, where from these proceedings emanated, contained the following single term of reference: Whether the services of Sh. Subh Narain Sahu have been terminated illegally and/or unjustifiably by the management and if so, to what relief is he entitled and what directions ...
Imran vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2019
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.No.949/2018 Judgment reserved on:08. h August, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:22. d August, 2019 IMRAN ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Naomi Chandra, Advocate STATE Versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State. Insp. Fatesh Singh and SI Shiv Ram, PS Amar Colony CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J1 The present appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellant under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment dated 28.02.2018 and the order of sentence dated 14.03.2018 passed by the Court of ASJ (Spl. FTC), South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi, in SC No.1688/2016 (FIR No.937/2015, P.S. Amar Colony), registered under section 376/392/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as IPC) whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 376/392/50...
Padamjit Singh vs.n.d.m.c. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5259/2017 & C.M.Appln.22319/2017 (stay) % Reserved on:04. 07.2019 Date of decision:22. d August, 2019 PADAMJIT SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Amit Kumar Dubey, Advocates versus N.D.M.C. & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh and Ms. Kriti Sinha, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON ASHA MENON, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 02.06.2017, passed by the Enforcement Department of the respondent no.1/New Delhi Municipal Council (in short NDMC) cancelling his licence/tehbazari permission dated 18.08.1975, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition praying inter alia that the show- cause notice dated 06.01.2017 and the impugned order dated 02.06.2017 be quashed and respondent no.1/ NDMC be directed to permit him to carry on his business with the aid of the Health Monitor Weighing Machine at Connaught Place...
Pankaj Oswal vs.aruna Oswal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2019
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :02. 08.2019 Judgment Pronounced on:22. 08.2019 CS(OS) 53/2017 PANKAJ OSWAL ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Sanjeev Puri, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Mayank Mishra and Mr.Raghav Sabharwal, Advs. versus ARUNA OSWAL & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sanjiv Kakra, Mr.Bharat Arora and Mr.Gaurav Arora, Advs. for D-1 & D-2. Mr.Ajay Sondhi, Adv. for D-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.14656/2018 1. This application is filed by defendants No.1 and 2 under Order 6 Rules 17 CPC for amendment of the written statement. The plaintiff has filed the accompanying suit seeking a preliminary decree of partition declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to 1/4th share in the suit properties listed in the schedule as also the properties belonging to the Oswal family. A decree of rendition of accounts with respect to the profit and proceeds realized by the defendants from the suit properties as...
Nimish H. Shah and Anr. Vs.securities and Exchange Board of India and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: July 26, 2019 Judgment delivered on: August 22, 2019 + W.P.(C) 7768/2019, CM No.32308/2019 NIMISH H. SHAH AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Bhavin Gada, Mr. Manendra Singh, Ms. Mehak Gupta, Ms. Arpan Behl, Mr. Rohan Roy, Ms. Priya Singh and Ms. Akshita Sachdeva, Advs. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sandhya and Ms. Cassandra Zosangliani, Advs. for R1/SEBI Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. V.P. Singh, Mr. Abhijnan Jha, Mr. Abhishek Singh and Ms. Drishti Harpalani, Advs. for R2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers: In view of the facts and circumstances stated hereinabove, it is therefore prayed this Honble Court may graciously be pleased to: W.P.(C) No.7768...
M/S. S. Gurcharan Singh & Sons vs.commissioner Trade & Taxes & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * 21 + M/s. S. GURCHARAN SINGH & SONS W.P.(C) 13004/2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Nischal and Mr. Arif Ahmed Khan, Advocates COMMISSIONER TRADE & TAXES & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel with Mr. Satyakam, Assessee for GNCTD with Mr. V.S. Malik, Advocate for GNCTD CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER2208.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner has approached this Court for a declaration that the objections filed by the... Petitioner before the Objection Hearing Authority (OHA) against the assessments for the period 2009-10 (annual) should be deemed to be allowed. One consequential prayer is for setting aside the default notices of assessment of tax, interest and penalty all dated 19th May, 2011. The other consequential prayer is for a direction of the... RESPONDENTS to refund to the... Petitioner Rs.1,34,35,473/- (total) for the periods from May to December...
Ankush Jain vs.pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t August, 2019 Decided on:21. t August, 2019 + ANKUSH JAIN W.P. (C) 6541/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Senior Advocate with Mr. P. Roy Choudhary, Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Ms. Jyotsna Mehta and Mr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Advocates. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue. + VAIBHAV JAIN W.P. (C) 6543/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Senior Advocate with Mr. P. Roy Choudhary, Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Ms. Jyotsna Mehta and Mr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Advocates. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH W.P. (C) 6541/2017 & 6543 of 2017 Page 1 of 18 % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These are two writ petitions arising out of a simila...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »