Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Realtech Infrastructure Limited vs.smart Housing Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2019
$~13 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:23. 08.2019 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) No.329/2019, I.A. No.11521/2019 (Exemption) REALTECH INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED Through: Mr. Saurabh Dev Karan Singh, Advocate ..... Decree Holder versus SMART HOUSING PVT. LTD. & ANR. ..... Judgment Debtor Through: Mr. Nilava Bandhopadhyay, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH ORDER JYOTI SINGH, J (ORAL) I.A. No.11521/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) No.329/2019 1. Issue notice of the petition to the respondents.2. Mr. Nilava Bandhopadhyay, Advocate accepts notice.3. This petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the OMP (MISC) (COMM) No.329/2019 Page 1 of 2 Act), seeking extension of time for the sole Arbitrator to pass the Award. The time period of 12 months as sought under Section 29A(1) of the Act had expired on 14.0...
Kamlesh & Anr. Vs.rahul Kumar & Ors (M/S National Insurance Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2019
$~31 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. 08.2019 MAC.APP. 751/2019 KAMLESH & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajveev Sood, Advocate. RAHUL KUMAR & ORS (M/S NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD) versus Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI for R-3. NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 37745/2019 & CM APPL. 37746/2019 (for delay) 1. These applications seek condonation of delay in filing and re-filing of the appeal.2. For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the delay is condoned. The appeal be taken on record.3. The applications stand disposed-off. MAC.APP. 751/2019 4. Issue notice. Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, the learned counsel for respondent No.3 accepts notice.5. 6. At joint request, the appeal is taken up for disposal. This appeal seeks enhancement of the compensation awarded to the appellants. The facts of the case are that the deceased was pursuing an MAC.APP. No.751/2019 Page 1 of 3 under-graduate course i....
Sahib Singh vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2019
$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 9055/2018 SAHIB SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Saahila Lamba withMr.T.S.Dagar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.K. Singh, Standing Counsel for Railways with Mr.Varun Bhadola and Mr.Saurabh Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER2308.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner who retired from the Railway Protection Force on 30th April 2017 seeks a direction to the... RESPONDENTS to treat the period of suspension of the... Petitioner from 20th September, 1984 to 24th August, 1994 as period spent on duty; calculate the retiral benefits of the... Petitioner including the last drawn salary on that basis and release his Death Cum Retirement Gratuity (DCRG) in the sum of Rs.5,94,000/- stated to have been withheld by the... RESPONDENTS.2. The background facts are that the... Petitioner was appointed as Rakshak (later re-designated as Constable) in ...
Pritika & Ors. Vs.delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (Dsssb) & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2019
$~27 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:23. d August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9119/2019 PRITIKA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Aditya Aggarwal, Mr.Ankit Mutreja, Mr.Amit Rana and Ms.Ruchika, Advocates versus DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD (DSSSB) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat with Mr.Nitesh Singh, Advts. for R-1 and R-2. Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for SDMC/R-3. Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, standing counsel for East DMC/R-4 with Mr.Hem Kumar and Ms.Bushra Waseem, Advocates. Ms.Namrata Mukim, Adv. for North DMC/R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M.37642/2019 (exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 9119/2019 3. Counsels for the respondents enter appearance on advance copy. W.P.(C) 9119/2019 Page 1 of 6 4. The present petition is directed against the order dated 26.07.20...
Parmod Chuni vs.m/s Excel Pack Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2019
$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 08.2019 C.R.P. 189/2019 PARMOD CHUNI versus M/S EXCEL PACK PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Uday Bedi with Mr. Jaitegan Singh, Advocates. For the Respondent : None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.37774/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. C.R.P. 189/2019 & CM APPL.37772/2019 APPL.37773/2019 (for condonation of delay) (stay), CM1... Petitioner impugns order dated 03.04.2019, whereby, the application of the petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint has been dismissed on the ground that the question of limitation is a mixed question of facts and law and as such the plaint cannot be rejected at the threshold. C.R.P. 189/2019 Page 1 of 4 2.... Petitioner was an employee of the respondent and admittedly had taken an advanc...
Satya Prakash vs.mukesh Rajora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2019
$~33 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d August, 2019 SATYA PRAKASH CM (M) 1225/2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M. B. Harikant, Advocate. (M:9818908789) versus MUKESH RAJORA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj Dahiya, Advocate. (M:9971767788) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CAV8442019 1. Caveat is discharged as the caveator has appeared. CM (M) 1225/2019 & CM APPL.37608/2019 (stay) 2. The present review petition challenges the order dated 29th May, 2019 passed by the Ld. ADJ in the suit for recovery filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff.3. The present petition arises out of a suit under Order XXXVII CPC filed by Mr. Mukesh Rajora, Plaintiff/Respondent (hereinafter Plaintiff) seeking recovery of a sum of Rs.30 lakhs along with pendente lite and future interest. The suit is based upon the agreement dated 22nd October, 2014 wherein the... Petitioner/Defendant (hereinafter Defendant) is stated to have received Rs.30 lakhs for s...
Amrit Singh vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5492/2019 & C.M. APPL. 24099/2019 AMRIT SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajinder Nischal with Mr.Ashish Nischal, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Rashmi Bansal, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr.Himanshu Pathak, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER2308.2019 % Talwant Singh, J.1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged his non- selection as Constable (Generator Operator) in the Border Security Force under the OBC category, despite passing the written examination and being declared fit in the medical examination.2. In brief, the facts are that in response to an advertisement issued by Respondent No.3 on 31st August, 2018 for filling up of 23 vacancies of Constable (Generator Operator), the... Petitioner herein had applied for the same. Out of these 23 vacancies, 11 were reserved for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and apart from other qualifi...
Exim Cargo Services vs.commissioner of Customs (General)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2019
$~40 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d August 2019 CUSAA3252018 & C.M. Nos. 50885-50887/2018 EXIM CARGO SERVICES ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shalinder Saini, Mr. Jitender Saini & Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (GENERAL) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Suhani Mathur, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA SANJEEV NARULA, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been filed under section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order dated 08.05.2018 in Customs Appeal No.C/50754/2018-CU[DB]. and order dated 27.07.2018 in Customs ROM Application No.C/ROM/50603/2018 (in Customs Appeal No.C/50754/2018-CU[DB].), passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, whereby Order-in-original dated 06.02.2018 of the Commissioner of Customs (General), Custom House, New Delhi cancelling Customs House...
M/S Advantages India & Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-1 to R-7 $~ * + W.P.(CRL) 3595/2017 & Crl.M.A.3758/2019 M/S ADVANTAGES INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Mr.Arjun Singh Bhati, Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Mr.Pranav Ralli, Mr.Vaibhav Suri, Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi, Ms. Narayani Bhattacharya, Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Ms. Rekha Anjara, Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. C. Govind Venugopal, Mr. Sharang Dhulia, and Mr. Pratheek Bhalla, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Mr. Vinod Diwakar with Mr.Dhruv Pande and Ms. Mallika Hiramath, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Anil Grover, SPP for CBI with Mr.Shivesh P.Singh, Noopur Singhal and Mr.Mishal Vij, Advocates. WITH + W.P.(CRL) 1884/2018 & Crl.M.A.2155/2019 M/S CAPITAL PRINT PROCESS PVT LTD & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dhruv Gupta with Mr. Shaishav Manu, Advocates. Page 1 of 59 W.P.(Crl.) 3595/2017 & Ors. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPO...
Lalit Kala Akademi vs.sh. Anshul Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2019
$~84 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 08.2019 W.P.(C) 9103/2019 LALIT KALA AKADEMI versus ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Mahender Kr. Bhardwaj and Mr. K.C. Dubey, Advs. SH. ANSHUL KUMAR Through None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 37607/2019 Delay condoned. Application stands disposed off. W.P.(C) 9103/2019 AND CM APPL. 37606/2019 By the instant petition, the petitioner assails the order dated 29.11.2018 passed by the Court of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (Divyangjan), whereby, respondent No.1 has been directed to be appointed against the post of MTS. Concisely, the facts giving rise to the writ petition are that there was 2. one post of MTS with the petitioner under PwD category in Group C PB-I for hearing impaired persons. For the selection to such post, the petitioner Page 1 of 4 W.P.(C) 9103/2019 held a written examination besides skill test and drew a merit position. The m...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »