Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Seasons Furnishings Ltd. Vs.assistant p.f. Commissioner Regional O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-"27.08.2019. + W.P.(C) 9273/2019 M/S SEASONS FURNISHINGS LTD. Through: Mr.Nikhil Patnaik, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus ASSISTANT P.F. COMMISSIONER REGIONAL OFFICE DELHI EAST AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Balraj Dhawan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) CM No.38239/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 9273/2019 & CM No.38238/2019 (for stay) 1. The present writ petition under Articlesof the Constitution of India assails the order dated 06.02.2019 passed by respondent no.1 under Section14 B and 7Q of the Employees Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and the consequential recovery certificate dated 31.05.2019.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an order dated 06.02.2019 under section 14 B of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 read with Section...
Balbir Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~A-5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 6675/2011 BALBIR SINGH Date of decision:27. 08.2019 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Lalit Kumar and Mr.Manoj Yadav, Advs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sanjay Kr.Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for issuing a Writ of Mandamus and Certiorari directing the respondent to act in the matter immediately and recommend the alternative plot of 400 sq.yards as per scheme to the petitioner in respect of his acquired land and further send the file to DDA for allotment. It is further prayed to call the entire records of the petitioners file.2. It is the case of the petitioner that the alleged land measuring about 54 bigha situated in village Bagrola, Delhi of the petitioner was got acquired by the Land Acquisition Collector on 19.09.1986. Later on the said land was ...
Hardeep Singh vs.wasan Singh and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h August, 2019 CS(OS) 1299/2007 HARDEEP SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja with Versus Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advs. WASAN SINGH AND OTHERS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. S.S.Yadav, Adv. for D-1, 3 and 4. Mr. S. Muthukrishnan with Ms. Divya Chaudhary, Adv. for D-2. AND CS(OS) 218/2009 MAHINDER KAUR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. S.S.Yadav, Adv. Versus HARDEEP SINGH & ANR. Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja with ..... Defendants Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advs. for D-1. Mr. S. Muthukrishnan with Ms. Divya Chaudhary, Adv. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 CS(OS) No.1299/2007 has been filed by Hardeep Singh, against his (a) grandfather Wasan Singh, (b) father Kulwant Singh (c) paternal grandmother Mahinder Kaur, and (d) fathers brother Surinder Singh, CS(OS) 1299/2007 & CS(OS) 218/2009 Page 1 of 14 for partition of (i) property no.Furniture Block, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi; (ii) agricultural land and houses situ...
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.harpreet Kaur & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 747/2019, CAV8412019 & CM APPL. 37379/2019 Decided on:27. 08.2019 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni and Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocates. HARPREET KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Yatendra Kr. Sharma and Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CAV8412019 1. Since the learned counsel named above enters appearance for the caveator, the caveat stands discharged.2. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 747/2019 & CM APPL. 37379/2019 3. This appeal impugns the award of compensation on the ground that there is apparent error in the calculation of compensation.4. The learned MACT had taken the monthly income of the deceased at Rs. 1,00,000/- against a claim of Rs. 2,00,000/-. It had taken into consideration the passbooks, other data and evidence brought on record, including the fact that there were two other employees to whom ...
Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs.psysteme & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h May, 2019 Date of decision:26. h August, 2019 + O.M.P. 172/2014 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A. S. Chandiok, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sharat Kapoor, Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Mr. Shrey Kumar, Mr. Ramya Kutty and Mr. Taran Singh, Advocates. (M:9818493330) versus PSYSTEME & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Ms. Shrutika Garg, Advocates. (M:9311399002) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The short question that arises in the present case is as to whether there existed an obligation on Respondent No.1- Psysteme GmbH and Respondent No.2 M/s Mantri Enterprises (hereinafter the Suppliers) for obtaining comprehensive marine cum erection insurance (hereinafter CME insurance) and if so, the scope of the said insurance policy. The... Petitioner Steel Authority of India Limited (hereinafter SAIL) floated a global tender on 20th October, 2000 for design, engine...
Chhotey Lal @ Chhutalla vs.state Govt Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 599/2015 Reserved on :21. 08.2019 Date of Decision:26. 08.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: CHHOTEY LAL @ CHHUTALLA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ajayinder Sangwan, Mr. Sachin Choudhary and Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocates. STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with SI Parmod Kumar, PS Shahdara. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.1. By way of the present appeal, the appellant has assailed the judgment dated 10.03.2015 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi vide which the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC in SC No.arising out of FIR No.153/2013, registered under SectionsIPC at Police Station Shahdara, Delhi.2. Vide order on sentence dated 10.03.2015 the appellant was sentenced to undergo RI for 7 years under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC along with fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of which the appe...
Ravinder vs.subhash Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2019
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h August, 2019 + RAVINDER CM (M) 1239/2019 Through: Mr. Satish Kumar Mishra, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus (M:8860455133) Through: None. SUBHASH GUPTA CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ..... Respondent Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The... Petitioner/Defendant (hereinafter Defendant) in the present petition has challenged the impugned orders dated 9th January, 2018 and 24th January, 2019. The said two orders, in effect, close the right of the Defendant to file the written statement. The delay in filing of the written statement, according to ld. counsel for Defendant, occurred because of the fact that one of the documents was not supplied by the Plaintiff to the Defendant i.e. bill no.1050 dated 29th March, 2014. The second reason raised for the delay is that the earlier counsel did not diligently prosecute the matter.2. The Court has heard ld. counsel for the Defendant. A perusal of the orders passed by the Trial...
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.phool Kumari & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 533/2017, CM APPL. 23154/2017, CM APPL. Decided on:26. 08.2019 15893/2018 & CM APPL. 15894/2018 THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.P. Jain, Mr. Himanshu Gambhir and Mr. Ravi Gupta, Advocates. Versus PHOOL KUMARI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nikhil Tripathi, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 15894/2018 1. This application seeks condonation of delay in filing the appeal.2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned. The appeal is taken on record.3. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 533/2017, CM APPL. 23154/2017 & CM APPL. 15893/2018 4. This appeal impugns the award of compensation on the ground that 76% permanent disability in relation to the claimants left limb below the knee and amputation of all her toes in the right leg. The learned counsel for MAC.APP. No.533/2017 Page 1 of 3 the ...
Naresh Bansal vs.state (Gnctd) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2019
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: July 30, 2019 Decided on: August 26, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 4461/2016 NARESH BANSAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg & Mr. Imran Khan, Advs. versus STATE (GNCTD) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA State. JUDGMENT1 On 19.08.2004, the petitioner presented a criminal complaint (No.473/1/2004) in the court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi (CMM, Delhi) alleging offences punishable under sections 365/368/342/341/506/323/330 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) having been committed by the second to eighth respondents herein, along with one another (Constable Vijay Kumar) (since deceased). The said criminal complaint was subjected to inquiry under sections 200 and 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) in the course of which three witnesses were examined, they including the petitioner (complainant before the Magistrate) him...
Sindhudurg Shikshan Prasarak Mandal vs.board of Governors in Supersess ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + WP (C) 6926/2019 & CM APPL.28799/2019 Judgment reserved on :20.08.2019 Date of decision :26. 08.2019 Sindhudurg Shikshan Prasarak Mandal ........ Petitioner Through: Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Om Prakash, Ms. Manisha Mehta, Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Mr. R.L. Sinha & Ms. Pallavi Nagar, Advocates. versus BOARD OF GOVERNORS IN SUPERSESSION OF MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Biakthan Sanghi, Mr. Tarun, Ms. Arunima Pal & Mr. Abhijeet, Advocates for MCI. Mr. Vivek Gotal, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner seeks the quashing of order contained in letter no.MCI-34(41)(F-30)/2019-Med/20090 dated 30.05.2019 by which WP (C) 6926/2019 Page 1 of 17 the respondent disapproved the scheme of the petitioner for establishment of a new college of 150 MBBS students for the academic...