Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahinder Kaur vs.hardeep Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h August, 2019 CS(OS) 1299/2007 HARDEEP SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja with Versus Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advs. WASAN SINGH AND OTHERS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. S.S.Yadav, Adv. for D-1, 3 and 4. Mr. S. Muthukrishnan with Ms. Divya Chaudhary, Adv. for D-2. AND CS(OS) 218/2009 MAHINDER KAUR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. S.S.Yadav, Adv. Versus HARDEEP SINGH & ANR. Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja with ..... Defendants Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advs. for D-1. Mr. S. Muthukrishnan with Ms. Divya Chaudhary, Adv. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 CS(OS) No.1299/2007 has been filed by Hardeep Singh, against his (a) grandfather Wasan Singh, (b) father Kulwant Singh (c) paternal grandmother Mahinder Kaur, and (d) fathers brother Surinder Singh, CS(OS) 1299/2007 & CS(OS) 218/2009 Page 1 of 14 for partition of (i) property no.Furniture Block, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi; (ii) agricultural land and houses situ...
Sunita Yadav vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~173 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA5462019 & C.M.Applns.38158-60/2019 % SUNITA YADAV Date of decision:27. 08.2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Mr. Ankit Singh, Ms. Bhavana Jain, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON ASHA MENON, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant/petitioner being aggrieved by the dismissal of her writ petition by the judgment dated 24.05.2019. The grievance of the appellant/petitioner arose from the cancellation of the allotment of Flat No.144, Second Floor, Block D-2, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi in her favour by the respondent/Delhi Development Authority (DDA) vide communication dated 30.09.2019.2. The appellant/petitioner had applied for allotment of a flat under the DDA Housing Scheme 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the 2008 Scheme). Initially, the writ petition had been filed only for quashin...
Mrs. Tabassum vs.state of Nct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~78 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4208/2019 Date of decision:27. 08.2019 MRS. TABASSUM ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Kapil Sankhla with Ms. Meghna Sankhla, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby cancelling anticipatory bail and arrest of accused in the case bearing FIR No.181/2019 registered at Police Station Fatehpur Beri for the offences punishable under sections 304B/498A/34 IPC.2.... Petitioner is the sister of victim who committed suicide on 14.05.2019. The present petition is filed on the ground that the learned Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the respondent/accused on factually incorrect and legally perverse grounds.3. The respondent/accused had failed to join the investigation and was absconding, consequently, proceedings under Sect...
State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) vs.anoop Baluni
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 592/2016, Crl.M.A. No.13742/2016 (Stay) and Crl.M.A. No.13744/2016 (Condonation of delay) Reserved on :23. 08.2019 Date of Decision :27. 08.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with SI Kirpal Singh, PS Madhu Vihar. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate. ANOOP BALUNI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 The present revision petition is filed on behalf of the State challenging the order on charge dated 03.05.2016 passed by the ASJ-01 & Spl. Judge (NDPS) Shahdara, Delhi in FIR No.1472/2014 registered under Section 354-B/506/5IPC & 8 POCSO Act at P.S. Madhu Vihar, Delhi.2. I have heard learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the respondent and have gone through the lower court records.3. The FIR, in the present case, was registered on 08.12.2014 at the instance of the complainant, who was aged about 17 years. ...
Tek Chand Narula and Others vs.union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.2428/2015 & CM APPLs. 4371/2015 & 12669/2016 Judgment reserved on 30 November, 2018 Judgment pronounced on 27 August, 2019 ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. S.N. Chaudhri and Ms. Shruti Chaudhri, TEK CHAND NARULA AND OTHERS versus Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Kamal Kant Jha, Mr. Krishna Kumar, and Mr. Siddharth Jha, Advs. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. R.N. Vats, Standing Counsel & Mr.Akshat Gupta, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.:1. The petitioners, who are the progeny of one Daulat Ram Narula, have preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to assail, essentially, the misuse charges and damages for unauthorized construction sought to be levied by the respondents qua property described as 1/90, P Block, Connaught Circus, New Delhi (hereafter referred to as property). 1.1 Portions of the property were...
Land & Building Dept, Gnctd vs.kasturi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~32 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. 08.2019 LPA5442019 LAND & BUILDING DEPT, GNCTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Adv. KASTURI versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM APPL.38139/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM APPL.38137/2019 This application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 301 days in preferring this appeal. Having heard the counsel for the appellant and looking into the reasons stated in the application, there are reasonable grounds for condonation of delay. We hereby condone the delay of 301 days in preferring this appeal. The application is allowed and disposed of. LPA5442019 Page 1 of 8 LPA5442019 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original respondent in W.P.(C) 6175/2018, which was allowed by the lear...
Imran vs.state (Nct) of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 08.2019 + CRL.REV.P. 272/2019 and CRL.M.A. 5131/2019 IMRAN Through: Mr. Mohammad Sajid and Mr. Arun ........ Petitioner Saxena, Advs. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State. R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 34359/2019 1. Vide the present application, the applicant seeks direction thereby to waive of the costs liable to be paid by the petitioner to the Delhi State Legal Services Authority.2. It is stated in the application that the applicant is a poor person whose monthly income is less than 7000/- . He is the only bread-earner of the family and driving auto rickshaw. The petitioner is the only person in the entire family to look after the needs of the family members which includes his wife who is suffering from several diseases, his mother and two school going children. It is further submitted that due to the ex...
Mohd. Anis vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 229/2013 Reserved on :19. 07.2019 Date of Decision :27. 08.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: MOHD. ANIS ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Vidur, Mr. Apurv and Ms. Sanjeevni Mittal Jain, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP with Insp. Ratnesh Kr. and ASI Suresh Kr., New Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 The present proceedings are instituted challenging the judgment on conviction dated 14.01.2013 passed by ASJ-03(NE), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi arising out of SC No.1in FIR No.registered under Section 307 IPC at P.S. New Usmanpur, Delhi whereby the appellant was convicted for an offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and vide order on sentence dated 15.01.2013, the appellant was directed to undergo RI for two years with a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of which, the appellant was directed to undergo RI for a period of six months. The benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C. was granted to the appellant. CRL A229...
Sunil Batra vs.smt. Shweta Batra & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~ 26 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"27th August, 2019 FAO982019 & CM No.11120/2019 SUNIL BATRA Through: Mr. Harshvardhan Pandey, ..... Appellant versus Adv. with appellant in person. SMT. SHWETA BATRA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagdeep Kr. Sharma & Mr. Anirudh Mehrotra, Advs. with Respondent no.1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) Caveat 237/2019 Since the caveator has appeared, caveat stands discharged. FAO982019 & CM No.11120/2019 1. The appellant herein had instituted a civil suit (suit No.10474/2016) impleading the respondents, and one another, as defendants, the prayer made therein being for certain reliefs against some of them (first, second and fourth defendants) primarily concerning property bearing No.C-35, second floor, South Extension Part-I, New Delhi. The prayers in the said civil suit include one for a decree for eviction of the first respondent (first defendant in the suit) from the suit property and for th...
Kulwant Singh & Anr. Vs.ravinder Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
% + RAVINDER KAUR + RC.REV. 274/2019 KULWANT SINGH & ANR RAVINDER KAUR + RC.REV. 466/2018 RAVINDER KAUR $~44, 45 & 50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. 08.2019 RC.REV. 592/2018 MAN MOHAN @ MASTOO RAM ....... Petitioner versus versus versus ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS DARSHAN SINGH & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Love Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person in RC.REV. 592/2018 Mr. R.K. Jain, Adv. in RC.REV. 274/2019 Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Mr. Aman Leckna and Ms. Ruchira Yadav, Advs. in RC.REV. 466/2018 For the Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Mr. Aman Leckna and Ms. Ruchira Yadav, Advs. in RC.REV.592/2018 & in RC.REV.274/2019 RC.REV.592/2018 & RC.REV.274/2019 RC.REV.466/2018 Page 1 of 9 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. R.K. Jain, Adv. in RC.REV. 466/2018 JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 592/2018 & CM APPL. 51502/2018 (stay), RC.R...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »