Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Popular Front of India vs.times Now & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h August 2019 CS(OS) 427/2019 POPULAR FRONT OF INDIA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Bahar U Barqi, Adv. TIMES NOW & ORS. ..... Defendants versus Through: Mr. Kunal Tandon, Ms. Niti Jain, Ms. Richa Shandilya and Mr. Girdhar Singh, Advs. for D-1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit against (i) Times Now; (ii) Rahul Shivshankar; (iii) Nikunj Garg; and, (iv) Anand Narasimhan, for (a) recovery of damages amounting to Rs.2,01,00,000 with interest at 12% per annum w.e.f. 30th November, 2018 till recovery of the amount; and, (b) permanent injunction restraining the defendants from televising any such baseless report against the Plaintiff in future in any manner whatsoever.2. It is inter alia the case of the plaintiff, (i) that the plaintiff, a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, has suffered the damages claimed, on account of telecast, on 31st Augus...
Vimal Aggarwal vs.bhanu Pratap
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h August, 2019 VIMAL AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner CM(M) 39/2018 Through: Mr. Vikas Arora and Ms. Radhika Arora, Advocates (M:98114. 4440). versus BHANU PRATAP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajender Mathur, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 27th October, 2017 by which the application filed by the Plaintiff under Order XII CPC Rule 6 was dismissed by the Trial Court.2. The brief background is that the Plaintiff/Petitioner (hereinafter Plaintiff) filed a suit for possession, mesne profits/damages against the Defendant in respect of the first floor of property bearing No.10 F-10/18, Model Town-II, Delhi-110007. The case of the Plaintiff is that the Defendant was inducted as a tenant into the suit property vide lease deed dated 2nd December, 2009. The monthly rent initially was Rs. 28,000/- per month. The rent a...
Amrish Agarwal vs.m/s Venus Home Appliances Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h August, 2019. + CM (M) 1059/2018 AMRISH AGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman and Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Advocates. (M:9990389539) versus M/S VENUS HOME APPLIANCES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R. K. Aggarwal and Ms. Advocates. Sharan, Aparajita (M:9654010731) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 36518/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM (M) 1059/2018 & CM APPLs. 36516-17/2018 2. The present petition has been filed challenging order dated 4th August, 2018 by which the ld. Trial Court has taken on record the Legal Proceedings Certificate relating to the trademark VENUS. The objection by the... Petitioner/Defendant (hereinafter, Defendant) is that the evidence is concluded and the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) is seeking to file the said documents at the stage of final arguments.3. H...
Sai Cine Productions vs.central Board of Film Certification and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:27. 08.2019 W.P.(C) 674/2015 & CM No.1181/2015 + SAI CINE PRODUCTIONS ........ Petitioner Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF FILM CERTIFICATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Advocate with Ms Anupradha Singh, Advocate. : Ms Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC, Mr Abhigyan Siddhant, Mr Kartikeya Rastogi, Mr Kaartikeya Rastogi, Mr Viplav Acharya, Mr Harshul Chowdhryadn, Ms Ikshita Singh, Advocates for UOI/CBFC. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, 1. impugning an order dated 21.08.2014 passed by the Chairman, Central Board of Film Certification (hereafter CBFC) withdrawing the Certificate dated 29.05.2014 issued to the Cinematographic Film captioned Kaum De Heere. The petitioner also impugns an order dated 07.10.2014 passed by the ...
Ani Technologies Pvt Ltd vs.dinesh D Shelar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~50 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h August, 2019 CM(M) 1261/2019 & CM APPL. 38350/2019, 38349/2019 ANI TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Virmani, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shivangi Narang, Mr. Gurpreet Singh Kahlon & Mr. Subham Saigal, Advocates (M- 9407223688) versus DINESH D SHELAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr. Najeeb Nawab & Ms. Anushka Arora, Advocates (M-8860115852) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 29th 1. July, 2019 by which the amendment application moved by the Respondent - Dinesh D Shelar (hereinafter Plaintiff) has been allowed subject to payment costs of Rs.50,000/- as costs. The background of the dispute is that the Plaintiff had filed a suit for permanent injunction in respect of its circle logo which it was using in respect of its courier services. It is the case of the Plaintiff that the... Petitioner - ...
Venkateshwara Institute of Medical Sciences vs.board of Governors & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) No.6798/2019 and CM Nos. 28450/2019 & 34373/2019 Judgment reserved on :07. 08.2019 Date of decision :27. 08.2019 VENKATESHWARA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Through: Mr. J.S. Bhasin & Mr.Nishant ........ Petitioner versus Shokeen, Advocates BOARD OF GOVERNORS & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh GognaCGSC for R- 1 Mr.Anil Mittal & Ms. Komal Aggarwal, Advocates for R-2 Mr.Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Arunima Pal, Mr. Tarun Verma and Mr.Abhijit Chakravarty, Advocates for MCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner vide the present petition seeks the following prayers: (i) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for setting aside/quashing the decision of the Respondent No.1-BOG in Supersession of the MCI vide letter W.P.(C) No.6798/2019 Page 1 of 18 2. No.MCI-34(41)(R- 78)/2019/120551 dated 31.05.2019 (received ...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.neeru Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~12 * % + MAC.APP. 649/2019, CM APPL. 30087/2019, CM APPL. Decided on:27. 08.2019 30088/2019 & CM APPL. 30089/2019 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) Through: NEERU SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS CM APPL. 30088/2019 (for Delay) 1. This application seeks condonation of delay of 25 days in filing the appeal.2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned. The appeal is taken on record.3. The application stands disposed-off. CM APPL. 30089/2019 (for Exemption) 4. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.5. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. No.649/2019 Page 1 of 5 MAC.APP. 649/2019 & CM APPL. 30087/2019 6. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 11.03.2019 on the ground that there was no evidence apropos employment and salary of the deceased was led.7. The learned counsel for the appel...
Ravinder Kaur vs.darshan Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
% + RAVINDER KAUR + RC.REV. 274/2019 KULWANT SINGH & ANR RAVINDER KAUR + RC.REV. 466/2018 RAVINDER KAUR $~44, 45 & 50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. 08.2019 RC.REV. 592/2018 MAN MOHAN @ MASTOO RAM ....... Petitioner versus versus versus ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS DARSHAN SINGH & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Love Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person in RC.REV. 592/2018 Mr. R.K. Jain, Adv. in RC.REV. 274/2019 Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Mr. Aman Leckna and Ms. Ruchira Yadav, Advs. in RC.REV. 466/2018 For the Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Mr. Aman Leckna and Ms. Ruchira Yadav, Advs. in RC.REV.592/2018 & in RC.REV.274/2019 RC.REV.592/2018 & RC.REV.274/2019 RC.REV.466/2018 Page 1 of 9 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. R.K. Jain, Adv. in RC.REV. 466/2018 JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 592/2018 & CM APPL. 51502/2018 (stay), RC.R...
Badshah Singh vs.delhi Jal Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA6042014 ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rajiv Agarwal, Ms. Meghna De & Ms. Sugandh Kochhar, Advocates ..... Respondent Through Ms. Sakshi Popli and Ms. Samreen, Advocates versus BADSHAH SINGH CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH DELHI JAL BOARD ORDER2708.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 19th March, 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the Appellants Writ Petition (C) No.4068/1999, whereby he had challenged an Award dated 30th April, 1999 of the Industrial Tribunal in ID No.351/1990.2. The brief factual background is that the Appellant was appointed by the Respondent/Delhi Jal Board as Beldar on muster roll basis with effect from 1st January, 1982. The case of the Appellant is that he was asked by his superior i.e. the Assistant Engineer-II to work at his house as a domestic servant after duty hours. When the Appellant declined to do so, he was LPA6042014 Page 1 of 12...
M/S Deccan Charters Private Limited vs.sarita Tiwari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h August, 2019 Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate. M/S DECCAN CHARTERS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner + W.P.(C) 3422/2014 & CM No.7040/2014 & 30976/2019 Through: Mr. Rishi Jain, Advocate. SARITA TIWARI versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has challenged the ex-parte award of the Labour Court whereby the Labour Court awarded reinstatement with full back wages to the respondent.2. The petitioner appointed the respondent as Trainee AME on 01st August, 2006 at a monthly salary of Rs.15,000/-. The terms of the appointment of the respondent are contained in the appointment letter dated 01st August, 2006. Clause D of the appointment letter provides that the respondent shall be on probation for three months from the date of joining and she shall be deemed to continue on probation until confirmed in writing and such period, after initial period of probation, shall be deem...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »