Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Santosh Khurana vs.the Financial Commissioner, Government of Nct of De ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2019
$~A-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10068/2016 SANTOSH KHURANA Date of Decision:28. 08.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Atul Nigam and Mr.Randhir Kumar, Advocates Versus THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sapna Chauhan, Adv. for DDA Mr.Anil Tomar, Adv. for R1/GNCTD Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil) with Mr.Zakid Hanief and Mr.Manish Chauhan, Advs. for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of certiorari/mandamus or any other appropriate writ to quash the order dated 16.10.2015 passed by the Financial Commissioner. Other connected reliefs are also sought including direction to respondent No.5 to expedite the process of regularization in terms of the Zonal Development Plan.2. The case of the petitioner is that in 1989, construction was initiated for school building over land belonging to the Khurana Family th...
Narender Kumar Popli vs.sadan Batra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 08.2019 C.R.P. 103/2018 NARENDER KUMAR POPLI versus SADAN BATRA ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Priyanka Garg with Mr. Sanjeev K. Pabbi, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Ruchir Batra, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) C.R.P. 103/2018 & CM APPL.20603/2018 (stay) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 23.03.2018, whereby, the application of the petitioner seeking condonation of delay in filing the written statement and the right to defend the suit has been closed.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially copy of the annexures to the plaint were not supplied and they were supplied on 16.09.2017 and the written statement was filed on 20.12.2017, with a delay of about 14 days. She submits that there was a lapse on the CRL.REV.P.103/2018 Page 1 of 2 part of the earlier co...
Reena Pathak vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) 8329/2019 & C.M. No.34492/2019 (for exemption) REENA PATHAK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ashok Kr. Verma & Mr.Abhay Kumar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Saroha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articleof the Constitution of India assails the award dated 30.11.2017 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Dwarka Complex (hereinafter the Tribunal) in ID No.33/2017. The Tribunal has, on account of the petitioners failure to file any claim, passed the impugned award by holding that it was a case of no dispute.2. The petitioner having joined the respondent No.2-school on 01.11.2006 as a sweeper on contractual basis continued in the said capacity till 01.11.2012. Claiming that her services had been illegally terminated, the petitioner raised an industrial dis...
Uma Shankar Gurjar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
W.P.(C) 10005/2018 & C.M. No.38956/2018 (stay) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~19 * + UMA SHANKAR GURJAR ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Mayilsamy K., Advocate. versus Through: Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-1 & 3. Mr Naresh Kaushik and Ms Vibhuti Tyagi, Advocates for UPSC/R-2. Mr Anshuman Mehrotra, Mr Bhanu Gupta and Mr Ankur Chhibber, Advocates for R-5. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER2708.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The challenge in this petition is to Notification No.45013/9/2009-Pers.I, dated 6th December, 2017 published by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), Government of India, setting out the rules for the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) to be held by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) (Respondent No.2) for the purposes of filling up vacancies to the post of Assistant Commandants (Executive) [AC (E)]. in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) for the year W...
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.santosh Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. 08.2019 % + MAC.APP. 852/2018 & CM APPL. 38964/2018 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus SANTOSH DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Ahlawat, Proxy Counsel for R-1 to R-5. (Enrl. No.D-6399/18) (Mob.-9899886350). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation on the ground that compensation towards loss of future prospects has been granted @ 50% instead of 30%, as has been laid down in the dicta of the Supreme Court in National Insurnace Co. Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. (2017) 16 SCC680in para 61(iii). The deceased was a government employee and his age was 47 on the date of accident, therefore, he will be entitled to 30% towards loss of future prospects 2. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. It is accordingly so ordered.3. The impugned order has awarded only Rs. 40,000/- tow...
Krishan Gopal vs.surinder Kumar Chadha & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:2. d July, 2019 Pronounced on:27. h August, 2019 CM(M) 1112/2018 & CM APPL. 37833/2018 KRISHAN GOPAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Bharat Bhushan, Mr.D.K.Saini, Mr.Rajan & Mr.Harsh Tikoo, Advocates versus SURINDER KUMAR CHADHA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.S.M.Chugh & Ms.Namrath Arora, Advocates % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT1 The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order dated 07.02.2018, by which the Additional Rent Controller, Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the ARC]. declined leave to defend an eviction petition instituted by the respondents herein, and an order dated 04.08.2018, by which the ARC declined to review the order dated 07.02.2018. Facts 2. Krishan Gopal, the petitioner herein (hereinafter referred to as the tenant) is the tenant under Surinder Kumar Chadha and Suresh CM(M) 1112/2018 Page 1 of 12 Kumar Chadh...
Arshad Ali vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 08.2019 + CRL.REV.P. 827/2019 ARSHAD ALI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Aditya Singla, Adv. with Ms.Supriya Juneja, Adv. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 33215/2019 1.2. Issue notice. Learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State and has opposed the present application.3. Keeping in view the reasons stated in the present application, I hereby condone the delay of 108 days in filing the revision petition.4. The application is allowed. Crl.Rev.P.827/2019 5. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby setting CRL.REV.P. 827/2019 Page 1 of 4 aside the impugned order dated 14.01.2019 passed by ASJ, Rohini Courts, Delhi in FIR No.2487/2015 registered at police station Mangol Puri for the offences punishable under sections 3IPC.6. The revisionist accused is in judicial custody since 25.12.20...
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs.ahluwalia Contracts (India) Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) No.887/2013 & CM No.1685/2013 (for stay) REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Keshav Mohan, Adv. versus AHLUWALIA CONTRACTS (INDIA) LTD Through Mr.H.P. Arora, Adv. with Mr.Rajiv ..... Respondent Arora, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed by the Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), through its Regional Provident Fund Commissioner assails the interim order dated 09.11.2012 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal in ATA No.896(4) of 2012. Vide the said interim order the Appellate Tribunal, while admitting the appeal preferred by the respondent against the order dated 10.07.2012 passed by the petitioner, has granted a complete waiver of the condition of pre-deposit by exercising its powers under Section 7-O of the Employees Provident F...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.tarun Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. 08.2019 MAC.APP. 142/2016 & CM Nos. 5321-22/2016 $~16 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM No.5322/2016 (for delay) THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Versus TARUN KUMAR & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A. K. Soni and Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nikhil Tripathi, Advocate for Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Advocate for Respondent No.1. This application seeks condonation of delay in filing the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned and the appeal is taken on record. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 142/2016 & CM No.5321/2016 (for stay) 1. The award of compensation dated 15.09.2015 passed in Suit No.2is impugned on the ground that the learned Tribunal has erroneously granted 50% towards loss of future prospects instead of 40% MAC.APP. No.142 -2016 Page 1 of 3 in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in National Insurance ...
Man Mohan @ Mastoo Ram vs.ravinder Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2019
% + RAVINDER KAUR + RC.REV. 274/2019 KULWANT SINGH & ANR RAVINDER KAUR + RC.REV. 466/2018 RAVINDER KAUR $~44, 45 & 50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. 08.2019 RC.REV. 592/2018 MAN MOHAN @ MASTOO RAM ....... Petitioner versus versus versus ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS DARSHAN SINGH & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Love Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person in RC.REV. 592/2018 Mr. R.K. Jain, Adv. in RC.REV. 274/2019 Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Mr. Aman Leckna and Ms. Ruchira Yadav, Advs. in RC.REV. 466/2018 For the Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Mr. Aman Leckna and Ms. Ruchira Yadav, Advs. in RC.REV.592/2018 & in RC.REV.274/2019 RC.REV.592/2018 & RC.REV.274/2019 RC.REV.466/2018 Page 1 of 9 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. R.K. Jain, Adv. in RC.REV. 466/2018 JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 592/2018 & CM APPL. 51502/2018 (stay), RC.R...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »