Delhi Court August 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The State vs.shambhu Dayal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On:08. 07.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:30. 08.2019 CRL.A.174/2002 The State Versus Shambhu Dayal & Ors. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent ..... Appellant ..... Respondent : Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with Insp. Chander Bhan. : Mr. Gurbaksh Singh, Mr. Rahul Sarkar and Mr. K. Bhardwaj, Advocates for R-1 &2. Mr. M. Shamikh, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J1 The appellant has instituted the present appeal under section 378 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C) against the impugned judgment and order dated 15.10.1999, in Sessions Case No.14/98, arising out of FIR No.143/1987, registered at Police Station Anand Parbat; whereby CRL.A.174/2002 Page 1 of 38 the Trial Court has acquitted the accused persons Shambhu Dayal, Prakash Chand and Sh. Lal Singh...
Bhawan Singh Bhaisora vs.mahender Singh & Ors. (United India Insurance ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. 08.2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate MAC.APP. 230/2019 BHAWAN SINGH BHAISORA $~3 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) CM No.37117/2019 (for early hearing) Versus MAHENDER SINGH & ORS. (UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Ms. Arunima Gupta, Advocates for R-3. This application seeks early hearing of the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application, it is allowed. The application stands disposed-off. MAC.APP. 230/2019 1. At joint request, the appeal is taken up for hearing.2. This appeal seeks enhancement of the award of compensation on the ground that the appellant, who has suffered 82% disability in the prime of his life at the young age of 27 years apropos both of his lower limbs, one of MAC.APP. No.230-2019 Page 1 of 5 which has been amputated way above the knee, has suffered on many counts such as: (i) loss of marriage pr...
Vijay Kapoor vs. The High Court of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :30. h August, 2019 + LPA5522019 and CM Nos. 38666-38667/2019 VIJAY KAPOOR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur and Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advs. with appellant in person versus THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Uri Mohan for Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % ORDER3008.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) CM No.38666/2019 (condonation of delay) 1. This application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for condonation of 60 days delay in re-filing the appeal.2. Having heard learned Counsels for both sides and looking to the reasons stated in this application, there are reasonable reasons for condoning the delay. We, therefore, condone the delay in re-filing the appeal.3. The application is allowed and disposed of. LPA5522019 Page 1 of 3 CM No.38667/2019 (exemption) 4.5. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptio...
M/S Ever Bake vs.m/s Everbake Bakers Private Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 08.2019 C.R.P. 163/2019 & CM APPL. 34784/2019, CM APPL. 34783/2019 M/S EVER BAKE ........ Petitioner versus M/S EVERBAKE BAKERS PRIVATE LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Anshul Goel, Advocate CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 25.04.2019 whereby the application of the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 10 and 11 CPC has been rejected.... Petitioner had filed the application seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction.2. Respondent/plaintiff had filed the subject suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of registered Trademark, delivery up and rendition of accounts against the petitioner/defendant. Respondent claims to be the registered proprietor of the 3. C.R.P. 163/2019 Page 1 of 3 t...
Caper Travel Company Pvt Ltd vs.rohit Srivastava
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$~18 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EX.P. 161/2016 & EAs No.846/2016 (u/O XXI R-32 CPC), 847/2016 (u/S1112 of Contempt of Court Act) & 358/2018 (of JD u/O XXI R-23(2) CPC) CAPER TRAVEL COMPANY PVT LTD ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Faheem Shah, Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr. Akarsh Bhalla and Ms. Shriya Misra, Advs. with AR of DH in person. ROHIT SRIVASTAVA Versus ..... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary and Mr. Rohan Dewan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER3008.2019 Execution, by arrest and detention of the judgment debtor and by % 1. attachment of the properties of the judgment debtor, is sought of a order/decree dated 11th May, 2016 disposing of CS(OS) 2308/2015 in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 7th April, 2016 arrived at before the Mediation Cell of this Court and by binding the judgment debtor to the undertaking Annexure A to IA No.5069/2016 under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (C...
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.sanu Bala & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. 08.2019 MAC.APP. 657/2019 & CM No.30529/2019 $~14 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. SANU BALA & ORS. Through: Versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate. ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS In this appeal the insurer impugns the award of compensation dated 23.04.2019 passed by the learned MACT in MACP No.130/2014 on the ground that because it was the case of the claimants that the fatality of their kin was on account of a head-on collision between the two motor vehicles, therefore, negligence ought to have been apportioned equally on both the parties.2. In the earlier round of litigation, the Award of compensation was set aside by this Court in the insurers appeal and the case was remanded to the learned MACT for reconsideration by permitting the claimants to lead evidence of an eye-witness-Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, who has erroneously, not been examined. Subsequent...
Gadadhar Panda vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On:15. 07.2019 Judgment Pronounced On:30. 08.2019 CRL.A.1199/2012 Gadadhar Panda Versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent The State & Anr. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. S.R.Pandey and Mr. A.K.Pandey Advocates. Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. Mr. Alok Bhachawat, Mr. Uday Singh and Mr. S.Jeeva Nandan, ` Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J1 The appellant has instituted the present appeal under section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C) read with section 482 Cr.P.C. against the impugned judgment dated 30.07.2012 passed in Sessions Case No.50/2012, CRL.A.1199/2012 Page 1 of 32 arising out of FIR No.473/2007 (hereinafter referred to as the subject FIR), registered at Police Station Kalkaji; whereby the Trial Court has acquitted the appellant...
Dalbir Singh Sohi vs.the General Manager & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 08/2019 + LPA No.670/2018 DALBIR SINGH SOHI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Geetanjali Mohan, Advocate. versus THE GENERAL MANAGER & ANR Through: Mr. Rajat Arora, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JUDGMENT G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) The decision of the learned Single Judge in an application for modification of order, filed post the pronouncement of the judgment on 17.08.2018, wherein interest on leave encashment and gratuity was declined, has led to filing of the present appeal.2. The appellant had filed a writ petition before the learned Single Judge of this court seeking quashing of order dated 07.02.2000 read with corrigendum dated 06.06.2000, whereby the appellant stood dismissed from service, as well as of appellate order dated 18.08.2000 and review order dated 15.06.2002 made by respondent No.1. LPA6702018 page 1 of 5 3. The Single Judge allowe...
Lodge Juman vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 9457/2019 Judgment delivered on:30. 08.2019 LODGE JUMAN versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Mohinder Singh with Mr. Ankur Goel and Mr. Lovekesh Aggarwal, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Ms. Neha Garg and Ms. Nehul Sharma, Advocates for respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.38894/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 9457/2019 & CM APPL.38893/2019 (stay) 1. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents.2.... Petitioner inter alia seeks quashing of notices issued under Sections 4 and 7 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the Public Premises W.P.(C) 9457/2019 Page 1 of 5 Act) by the Estate ...
Katyan Shikshan Samiti vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2019
$~13 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA5542019 and CM APPL. 38815-17/2019 KATYAN SHIKSHAN SAMITI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Shrivastava, Mr. Arjun Garg, Ms. Sana Kamra and Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Dushyant Sarna, Advocate for R-1 Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Aditya Ranjan and Mr. Sachin Kumar Sharma, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER3008.2019 The present appeal assails the judgment dated 21.08.2019, passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing W.P.(C) 8094/2019, filed by the appellant/petitioner, impugning the order dated 19.07.2019, passed by the respondent No.1/Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy i.e. [AYUSH]. whereby it has been declined permission to start a new Ayurveda College at Bhopal, M.P.2. A glance at the relevant facts is n...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »