Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deepak Verma vs.daya Nand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. t May, 2019 Pronounced on:01. t July, 2019 C.R.P. 183/2018 & CM APPL. 35871/2018 DEEPAK VERMA Through: Mr. Ankur Jain, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus Through: Mr. P. K. Singh, Advocate. ..... Respondent DAYA NAND % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT1 The revisionist assails an order dated 30.05.2018, passed by the Trial Court, by which the application of the respondent/plaintiff for substitution of the deceased defendant, under Order XXII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as CPC]., was allowed.2. On 11.11.2014, the plaintiff filed a suit for recovery against Sh.Chandu Lal Verma, the father of the revisionist [hereinafter referred to as "original defendant"].. The suit filed by the plaintiff was for arrears of rent under a tenancy of a shop taken by the original defendant from the plaintiff. The shop is situated on the ground floor of property bearing No.1456, Gali No.10...
Lalit Kumar Jain & Ors vs.vistra Itcl (India) Limited & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:01. t July, 2019 FAO(OS)(COMM) 140/2019 LALIT KUMAR JAIN & ORS ..... Appellant Through Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Senior Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate, Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nikhil Rohtagi and Mr. Raghavendra Bajaj, Advocates, versus VISTRA ITCL (INDIA) LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Krishnendu Datta, Mr. Hardeep Sachdeva, Mr. Kamal Shankar, Mr. Parag Maint, Mr. Abhimayu Chopra, Mr. Priyank Ladio and Mr. Aman Sharma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal arises out of an order dated 28.05.2019 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court on an application filed along with the suit by the respondents no.1 and 2 herein (plaintiffs in the suit). The appellants appeared through Senior Counsels in the matter after going through the list. The learne...
Union of India & Anr vs.himanshu Prabhakar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
* % + W.P.(C) 1738/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on:27. 02.2019 01.07.2019 UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC and Mr.Farman Ali, Mr. Kunal Bhargava and Mr. Akash Mohan, Advocates. versus HIMANSHU PRABHAKAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Advocate for the respondents No.1, 11, 12, 40, 57 & 61. + W.P.(C) 4711/ 2017 HARVESH KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus HIMANSHU PRABHAKAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Prashanta Verma, Senior Central Govt. Counsel and Ms. Shalu Goswami, Advocate for respondent No.100/ UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA W.P.(C) 1738/2017 & 4711/2017 Page 1 of 42 JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The aforesaid writ petitions have been preferred by the petitioners to assail the common order dated 16.09.2016 passed by...
Gulshan Kumar Sachdeva vs.the Food corpn.of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2859/2003 GULSHAN KUMAR SACHDEVA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Gupta, Mr. Parinav Gupta, Ms. Mansi Gupta and Mr. Moazzam, Advs. % 1. versus THE FOOD CORPN.OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT0107.2019 This is a peculiar case in which, despite holding, in effect, that the charge, against the petitioner, was not proved, the Appellate Authority in the Food Corporation of India (FCI) has chosen, nevertheless, to impose, on the petitioner, a penalty of reduction in rank, from the rank of Technical Assistant-II (TA-II) to TA-III, with the further direction that the petitioners pay be fixed, in the scale of TA-III at the stage he would have drawn had he not been promoted.2. Though, on the face of it, such an order cannot sustain, it is appropriate that a brief overview of the facts is provided.3. The proceedings commenced from Memorandum, da...
Dharmender Aggarwal vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: May 27, 2019 Judgment delivered on: July 01, 2019 + W.P.(C) 7163/2017 DHARMENDER AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. J.K. Bhola, Adv. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR Through: Mr. Rajan Sabharwal, Standing ........ RESPONDENTS Counsel with Ms. Dipti Jain, Advs. for R1. Ms. Monika Arora, Mr. Kushal Kumar and Mr. Praveen Singh, Advs. for SDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging letter dated July 13, 2017 and order dated May 18, 2017 passed by the respondent Nos.4 and 3 respectively. Vide the impugned letter / order, the petitioner was debarred as Engineer / Structural Engineer for a period of two years with effect from the date of issuance of the circular i.e July 10, 2017.2. The case of the petitioner in the writ petition is that he was granted license by respondent No.2 South Delhi Municipal W.P.(...
P K Seth vs.state ( Nct ) of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :13. h March, 2019 Judgment delivered on:01. t July, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. 471/2016 P K SETH versus STATE ( NCT ) OF DELHI & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Harsh Prabhakar with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advs. with petitioner in person. For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. Mr. Om Prakash Sharma with Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 23.03.2016 whereby the revision petition filed by respondent No.2 impugning summoning order dated 02.07.2015 of the trial court was allowed.2. The petitioner/complainant filed the subject complaint contending that he was working as developer of electronic display boards for banking industry. Because of his age and health he was not able to carry out ...
Abhishat Chaudhary vs.shilpa Chaudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. t July, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 667/2015 ABHISHAT CHAUDHARY versus SHILPA CHAUDHARY ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Maldip Sidhu, Advocate For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Amrita Sharma, Advocate Ms. Anju Thomas, Advocate for BSES. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGEMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.REV.P. 667/2015 & Crl.M.A.15406/2015(seeking interim relief of stay of order dated 22.07.2015), Crl.M.A.15408/2015 (on behalf of petitioner seeking permission to file additional documents), Crl.M.A.6600/2018 (on behalf of respondent for placing additional documents on record) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 22.07.2015, whereby, the interim maintenance application of the respondent under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was allowed and petitioner was directed to pay maintenance @ Rs.25,000/- per month with effect from the date of the application i.e. 01.06.20...
Prema Sharma vs.director of Education & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 6388/2015 & CM APPLN. 11647/2015 & 21553/2018 Reserved on:14. 05.2019 Pronounced on:01. 07.2019 PREMA SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.D.N. Goburdhun, Adv. with Ms.Gauri Goburdhun, Adv. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Vikas Shokeen, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Kamal Gupta, Adv. with Mr.Yudhister Kaushik, Adv. for R-2. Mr.K.P. Tevathia, Legal Asst. For DoE. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to quash the impugned order dated 20.03.2015 passed by the Delhi School Tribunal in Appeal No.72/2010 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.2. The case of the petitioner is that she was appointed in the respondent- School as Primary Teacher (SUPW) purely on temporary basis vide W.P.(C) 6388/2015 Page 1 of 13 appointment letter dated 27.07.1993. However, she was continued in the employment of respondent no.1 v...
State vs.dr. Narender Mohan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :10. h May, 2019 Judgment delivered on:01. t July, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. 308/2017 & Crl.M.A.6862/2017 (for condonation of delay) X versus ........ Petitioner STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.REV.P. 382/2017 & Crl.M.A.8606/2017 (for condonation of delay) STATE versus DR NARENDER MOHAN ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. S.K. Sethi with Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocates (In Crl. Rev. P. 308/2017) Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. (In Crl. Rev. P. 382/2017) For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI H. Kumari, District Investigation South (In Crl. Rev. P. 308/2017) Mr. Dhanaiyai Kaushal with Mr. Tushar Kantiwal, Advocates for respondent No.2 (In Crl. Rev. P. 308/2017 & Crl. Rev. P. 382/2017) CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.Crl.Rev.P.308/2017 & 382/2017 Page 1 of 7 Crl.M.A.6862/2017 in CRL.REV.P. 30...
Gvk Airport Holdings Limited vs.bid Services Division (Mauritius) Limi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h May 2019 Pronounced on:1. t July 2019 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 96/2019 & I.A. 4839/2019 GVK AIRPORT HOLDINGS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kartik Nayar, Advocate, Mr. Sarthak Malhotra and Mr. Rishab Kumar, Advocate. versus BID SERVICES DIVISION (MAURITIUS) LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, Ms. Roopali Singh, Mr. Arvind Ramesh, Mr. Aditya Chatterjee and Mr. Mugeet Drabu, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. Sujoy Dattar, Advocate Respondent No.2. Mr. AbinavVasisht, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay Rai and Ms. Priya Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.3. for CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The present Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Arbitration Act) has been filed, inter alia seeking grant of interim/ ad interim relief of temporary injunction against Resp...
- ‹ Prev
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 77
- Next ›
- Last »