Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhupendra Singh Verma & Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. t July, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 467/2016 BHUPENDRA SINGH VERMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Sugandha Anand and Mr. Surinder Anand, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with SI Avaneesh Kumar, PS Farsh Bazar. Mr. Saurabh Kansal and Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Advocates for respondent No.2 with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGEMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1... Petitioners impugn judgment dated 26.04.2016, whereby, the Revisional Court has allowed the revision petitions filed by respondent No.2 as also the State impugning the order of charge of the Trial Court dated 17.12.2015.2. The Trial Court, by order dated 17.12.2015, had framed a charge against the petitioner No.1 Bhupender Singh Verma under Sections 354/354A/323 IPC but ha...
Patna Water Supply Distribution Network Pvt. Ltd. Vs.bihar Urban Infra ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h May 2019 Pronounced on:1st July, 2019 O.M.P. (COMM) 229/2019 & I.A. 8092/2019 PATNA WATER SUPPLY DISTRIBUTION NETWORK PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Varma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhay Rajy Varma and Mr. Vishal Nautiyal, Advocates. BIHAR CORPORATION LTD. URBAN versus INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shivam Singh, Advocate with Mr. Aditya Raina, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The... Petitioner by way of the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as Act) challenges the orders dated 25th April 2019, 4th April 2019 and 6th March 2019, passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in the ongoing arbitration between the parties. Brief Facts:2.... Petitioner is a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, by Gammon India Ltd. (majority O.M.P. (COMM...
Baljit Singh Bedi vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:01. 07.2019 W.P.(C) 727/2013 & CM APPL. No.1402/2013 % + BALJIT SINGH BEDI ........ Petitioner Versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr Lovkesh Sawhney. For the Respondent : Mr Pushkar Sood. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner claims to be a Projected Affected Person (PAP) on account of implementation of the Delhi Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS Project) and has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to the respondent Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited (hereafter DMRC) to forthwith allot a shop at Bhai Veer Singh Marg Shopping Complex (hereafter BVSMSC) in terms of the orders dated 15.09.2008 and 17.09.2008 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA16092006 and other connected matters. W.P.(C) 727/2013 Page 1 of 5 The petitioner claims that his father, Sh Mak...
Rohit vs.state (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI NISHANT STATE ROHIT Reserved on:10. h January, 2019 Decided on:1. t July, 2019 CRL.A. 647/2016 Represented by: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for ..... Respondent the State CRL.A. 924/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Mr. Tanu B. Mishra, Mr. Ravi Mishra, Ms. Harkamal Jeet Kaur, Ms. Roshni Rani and Mr. Gaura Bindal, Advocates STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Nishant and Rohit challenge the impugned judgment dated 26th May, 2016 convicting them for offence punishable under Section 3IPC and the order on sentence dated 30th May, 2016 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and six months each and to pay a fine of 10,000/- each, in default whereof to undergo simple Crl.A.647/2016 & Crl.A.924/2016 Page 1 of 6 imprisonment for a period ...
M/S Bharat Tourist Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.ganga Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d May, 2019 Pronounced on:01. t July, 2019 + FAO3962015 M/S BHARAT TOURIST PVT LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Jitender Mehta, Advocate. versus GANGA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Hari Kishan, Advocate for R-1 to 3. Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocate for R-4. % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT1 This appeal under Section 30 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter as referred to as "the Act") is directed against an order dated 24.09.2015, whereby the application filed by the appellant under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as "the CPC") for setting aside the ex- parte order dated 31.12.2013 passed by the Commissioner, Employee's Compensation, was dismissed. By the said order, the Commissioner ex-parte allowed an application filed by the FAO3962015 Page 1 of 11 respondents No.1 to 3 herein (the claimants) under Section 4A of the Act, and...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.m/s S a Builders Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
$~3 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:01. t July, 2019 EFA(OS) 17/2017 & C.M.20662/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Goel Standing Counsel, North MCD with Ms. Supreet Bimbra, Advocate and Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate alongwith Mr. Kamal Kishore Sharma, EE (M2), KP Zone and Mr. B.K. Garg, AE. versus M/S S A BUILDERS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tarun Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal arises out of an order dated 19.04.2017 passed by a learned Single Judge of this court on an application being E.A. (OS) No.34/2016 filed in a decided execution petition.2. Some necessary facts required to be noticed for disposal of this appeal are that work was awarded to the respondent for construction of a flyover at the level crossing at New Rohtak Road on 11.11.1983. The respondent filed an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration ...
Tirupati Buildings and Offices Pvt. Ltd. Vs.reserve Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: May 29, 2019 Judgment delivered on: July 01, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3356/2019, CM No.23095/2019 TIRUPATI BUILDINGS AND OFFICES PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Pulkit Deora, Ms. Mishika Bajpai and Ms. Sylvine Sarmah, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with ..... Respondent Mr. H.S. Parihar, Mr. Kuldeep Parihar, Mr. Azhar Alam, and Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advs. for RBI. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Adv. for R2. Mr. Prateek Kushwaha, Adv. for R3. Mr. K.P.S. Kohli, Adv. for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned above it is most humbly prayed that this Honble Court may graciously be pleased to: W.P.(C) No.3356/2019 Page 1 of 45 (a) Direct the Respondent No.1 to take a decision on the Assignment pertaini...
S. K. Pattanayak vs.ministry of Railways and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8310/2018 & CM APPL. 31902/2018 10.05.2019 Reserved on: Pronounced on:01. 07.2019 S. K. PATTANAYAK ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Shaurya Sahay, Adv. with Mr.Chetan Joshi, Adv. versus MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr.V.S.R. Krishna, Mr.Sahil Sood, Mr.Harshul Choudhary & Mr.Viplav Acharya, Advs. for R-1/Railways. Ms.Bharathi Raju, CGSC for R-2. Mr.Sunil K. Jain, Adv. with Ms.Reeta Chaudhary, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing the office order dated 26.07.2018 issued by the respondent no.4- Corporation, whereby the services of the petitioner as Managing Director of respondent no.4 has been terminated forthwith. He further seeks direction thereby quashing the recommendation dated 26.07.2018 issued by W.P.(C) 8310/2018 Page 1 of 16 respondent no.1 recommending the termin...
r.k. Shivdasani vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 898/2006 % 1. R.K. SHIVDASANI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S. K. Gupta and Mr.Vikram Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr. Ripu ........ RESPONDENTS Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. T. P. Singh, Adv. for R-1/UOI Mr. L.R. Khatana, Adv. for R-2, 3 & 5 to 8 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT0107.2019 The travails of the petitioner, in the present case, commenced with the addressing, by Ms. Bimla Sharma, an employee of the Export Inspection Council of India (EIA) where the petitioner was, at the time, working as Deputy Director (Vigilance) of a complaint, dated 3rd February, 1999, the English translation of which reads thus (as reproduced in the order, dated 20th April, 1999 in CM No.18and 23in CW123899, passed by this Court): I beg to submit that on 2/2/99 at 3.30 p.m., I went to Deputy Director Shri R.K. Shivdasanis cabin to make a phone call. Then he said Bimla, you are looking very beautiful ...
Sh. Sudhir Mishra & Anr. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :23. 05.2019 Pronounced on :01. 07.2019 + W.P.(CRL.) 1245/2019 & CRL. M.A. NOS.9141-43/2019 SH. SUDHIR MISHRA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. V. Elanchezhiyan, Mr. Sandeep Tripathi, Mr. Azam, Mr.Manzar Anis and Mr. Mahender Kumar, Advs. Raashid versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, SC with Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC and Ms.Shivani Sharma & Mr. Shivam Tyagi, Advs. for State. SI Nitin and ASI Chander Pal, PS Farsh Bazar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA ORDER A.K.CHAWLA, J.By the instant writ petition, the petitioners-the husband and the wife, in short - Sudhir and Laxmi respectively, seek issuance of a writ of Certiorari to quash two search warrant orders dated 10.04.2019 and 22.04.2019 passed by MM-02, Shahdara, Karkardooma, Delhi on an W.P.(Crl.) No.1245/2019 Page 1 of 14 application made by the respondent No.3-Sh. Virender Singh, in short 'Virender', under Sections 97 and 98 of the Code o...
- ‹ Prev
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- Next ›
- Last »