Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Varun Kapur vs.neha Kapur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :16. h May, 2019 Judgment delivered on:01. t July, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. (stay), Crl.M.A.9259/2018 (under Section 340 Cr.P.C.), Crl.M.A.8384/2019 (for correction of order dated 07.02.2019) 549/2017 & Crl.M.A.12063/2017 VARUN KAPUR ........ Petitioner NEHA KAPUR ..... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners :... Petitioner in person For the Respondent : Ms. Nidhi T. Raj, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 07.04.2017 whereby the interim maintenance was granted to the respondent under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in the sum of Rs. 15000/- per month from the date of the application besides litigation expenses assessed at Rs. 11,000/-.2. The contention of the petitioner-husband is that the trial court has erred and has not considered the income of the petitioner. It is contending that the petiti...
Sitanta Das vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:01.07.2019. W.P.(C) 2987/2017 SITANTA DAS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pardeep Dahiya, Advocate. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Learned Standing Counsel for GNCT of Delhi is present for the sole respondent, in as much as vide order dated 10.04.2018, the respondent nos.2 to 4 have been deleted from the array of parties and vide order dated 13.04.2017, it is also indicated that the prayer made through the present petition is now confined to prayer clause (ii) made in the present petition, which reads to the effect:-"(ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.1 to consider as RTRM Hospital, Village Jaffarpur Kalan as in remote/difficult in Regulation 9(VII) of the Post Graduate Medical Education Regulation, 2000 (a) Hospital contemplated areas ...
Farooq Ahmed Shala vs.marie Chanel Gillier
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment reserved on:13. h March, 2019 Judgment delivered on:01. t July, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. 855/2018 FAROOQ AHMED SHALA versus MARIE CHANEL GILLIER ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Adab Singh Kapoor with Ms. Shefali Menezes, Advocates For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Mrinal Madhav with Mr. Tarunesh Kumar, Mr. Kaushikesh Kumar, Advocates with Respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGEMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.REV.P. 855/2018 & Crl.M.A.33331/2018 (stay) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 02.08.2018, whereby, appeal of the petitioner challenging order of interim maintenance dated 14.09.2017 has been dismissed.2. Order of interim maintenance @ Rs.60,000/- per month was passed by the Trial Court on 14.09.2017.... Petitioner impugned the CRL. REV. P.855/2018 Page 1 of 10 same by an appeal which has been rejected by the impugned order dated 02.08.20...
Gurmeet Singh vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:01. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 1023/2012 & CM APPL. Nos.2246/2012, 7202/2015 GURMEET SINGH ........ Petitioner Versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 1024/2012 & CM APPL. Nos.2248/2012, 7201/2015 GURPREET SINGH ........ Petitioner Versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Dubey, Ms. Manmeet Arora and Mr. Keshav Sehgal, Advocates. : Mr Pushkar Sood, Advocate. For the Respondent CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioners claim to be project affected persons (PAPs) due to implementation of the Delhi Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS) Project and have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying for rehabilitation as per the Relocation and Rehabilitation Policy in respect of the Project Affected Persons of all Categories due to the W.P.(C) 1023-1024/2012 Page 1 of 19 Impleme...
Financial Intelligence Unit-Ind vs.national Spot Exchange Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h January, 2019 Decided on:1. t July, 2019 CRL.A. 885/2017 & Crl.M.ANos.15618/2017 & 28568/2018 FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT-IND ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Senior Standing Counsel. versus NATIONAL SPOT EXCHANGE LTD ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ranjan Kumar Pandey, Mr. Sandeep Bisht, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Mr. Anuj Tiwari and Ms. Akashi Loda, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 this Appeal By the appellant Financial Intelligence Unit-Ind, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, challenges the judgment dated 27th June, 2017 passed by the Appellate Tribunal, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, New Delhi whereby the appeal of the respondent to the extent of violation was dismissed. However, since there was no reasoned order for imposing major penalty, the penalty was reduced from 1 lakh for each failure of the respondent to 15,000/- for each ...
Ritambhra Chawla vs.m/s Vayam Technologies Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d May, 2019 Pronounced on:01. t July, 2019 + C.R.P. 281/2018 & CM Appl. 892/2019 RITAMBHRA CHAWLA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Adab Singh Kapoor, Advocate. versus M/S VAYAM TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jeewesh Prakash, Advocate. % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT1 The revisionist is the plaintiff in Civil Suit No.423/2018, filed under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), pending before the Additional District Judge-05, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi. She assails an order dated 13.11.2018, by which the defendant (respondent herein) was granted unconditional leave to defend the suit.2. The plaintiff is a former employee of the defendant, having been employed as an IT Consultant from 09.08.2010, until she resigned on 28.10.2015. The suit was filed for recovery of unpaid dues C.R.P. 281/2018 Page 1 of 10 of 3,91,641/- which, according to the plaintiff, was admitted b...
Rajesh Oberoi vs.delhi International Airport Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
$~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:01. t July, 2019 LPA2032019 RAJESH OBEROI ..... Appellant Through Appellant in person along with Ms. Archana Sharma, Advocate versus DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anirudh Bakhru and Mr. Shadman A. Siddiqui, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 04.12.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in a writ petition filed by the respondent herein whereby the order of the Tribunal was assailed. The Tribunal in paras 11 and 12 had passed the following order: to keep is 11. It is clear from appraisal of the above judgment that application for grant of interim relief is legally maintainable irrespective of the proceedings and what the Tribunal is required the balancing facts and circumstances and nature of the enquiry held against the workman as well as other relevant circum...
Bses Yamuna Power Limited vs.rajender Goyal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: May 29, 2019 Judgment delivered on: July 01, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5183/2012, CM No.10585/2012 BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Srivastava, Adv. with Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee & Ms. Prachi Johri, Advs. versus RAJENDER GOYAL & ORS Through: Mr. Prashant Mehra, Adv. for R-1 & ........ RESPONDENTS R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by BSES Yamuna Power Limited challenging the order dated March 23, 2012 passed by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (Forum, in short), whereby the Forum has decided the Complaint No.06/01/2011 filed by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 herein challenging the bills raised by the petitioner herein in the month of February, 2009 for `6,35,330/- and `10,80,110/- respectively with regard to two electricity connections in property bearing No.R-551, New Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi purchased by respondent W.P.(C)...
Reshmawati vs.the Managing Committee and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
+ W.P.(C) 11565/2015 RESHMAWATI Reserved on:13. 05.2019 Pronounced on:01. 07.2019 ........ Petitioner $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through Mr. Suryakant Singla with Ms. Kartik Venu and Ms. Rimjhim Naudiyal, Advs. versus THE MANAGING COMMITTEE AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Satyendra Kumar, Adv. for Mr. R.V. Sinha, CGSC for R-1 Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC, Civil, GNCTD with Mr. Zahid Hanief and Ms. Manisha Chauhan, Adv. for DoE. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 27.08.2015 passed by Delhi School Tribunal in Appeal No.51/2013 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed by recording that technical rules of evidence have no application to the disciplinary proceedings. The Tribunal has power to judicial review of the administrative W.P.(C) 11565/2015 Page 1 of 15 action. The Tribunal has no power to trench on the jurisdiction to re- appreciate the evidenc...
X vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :10. h May, 2019 Judgment delivered on:01. t July, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. 308/2017 & Crl.M.A.6862/2017 (for condonation of delay) X versus ........ Petitioner STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.REV.P. 382/2017 & Crl.M.A.8606/2017 (for condonation of delay) STATE versus DR NARENDER MOHAN ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. S.K. Sethi with Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocates (In Crl. Rev. P. 308/2017) Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. (In Crl. Rev. P. 382/2017) For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI H. Kumari, District Investigation South (In Crl. Rev. P. 308/2017) Mr. Dhanaiyai Kaushal with Mr. Tushar Kantiwal, Advocates for respondent No.2 (In Crl. Rev. P. 308/2017 & Crl. Rev. P. 382/2017) CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.Crl.Rev.P.308/2017 & 382/2017 Page 1 of 7 Crl.M.A.6862/2017 in CRL.REV.P. 30...
- ‹ Prev
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- Next ›
- Last »