Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jange Ram Gondwal vs.chairman & Managing Director & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(C) 3033/2012 Reserved on:16. 05.2019 Pronounced on:01. 07.2019 JANGE RAM GONDWAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Shekhar G. Devasa, Adv. with Mr.Manish Tiwari, Adv. versus CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Jagat Arora, Adv. with Mr.Rajat Arora & Mr.Niraj Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to quash the impugned orders/proceedings dated 03.11.2011 and 23.02.2012 passed by the respondents- Disciplinary Authority as well as Appellate Authority awarding the penalty of compulsory retirement from service of the Bank, and consequently, reinstate the services of the petitioner with respondents Bank with consequential benefits and cost of the writ petition.2. The brief facts of the case of the petitioner are that on 24.10.1978, the petitioner was appointed as a clerk in the respondents Bank and thereafter, on 03.06....
Manju Sharma vs.vipin
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :23. d May, 2019 Judgment delivered on:01stJuly, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. 103/2015 MANJU SHARMA VIPIN versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: Mr. Lal Singh Thakur and Mr. SudhirTewatia, Adv. with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Kunal Rawat, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICESANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 01.11.2014 whereby the appellate court has dismissed the appeal of the petitioner impugning order dated 06.06.2013 whereby the trial court had fixed the maintenance for the petitioner and her daughter at Rs. 10,000/- per month with effect 13.09.2011.2. Parties were married on 11.07.2008. On 02.05.2009, a daughter was born who is in the care and custody of the petitioner.3. As per the petitioner she was turned out of her house on 14.11.2010 on account of failure to bring enough dowry and to give a Crl.Rev....
Bindu & Anr. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment reserved on:15. h April, 2019 Judgment delivered on:01. t July, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. 406/2017 & Crl. M.A. 9087/2017 (stay) & 792/2018 (directions) BINDU & ANR versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Ashu Arora, Adv. with petitioner in person. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with SI Vikram Singh Ms. Monica Anand Kumar and Mr. Shalabh Gupta, Advs. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1... Petitioners impugn order dated 28.03.2017 whereby the Revisional Court has reversed the order on charge dated 28.01.2017 passed by the Trial Court in case FIR No.944/2015 under Section 323/341/354/509/5IPC, P.S.Vasant Kunj (North).2. By order dated 28.01.2017, the Trial Court had discharged the petitioners of all offences. By the impugned order dated 28.03.2017 CRL.REV. P..406/2017 Page 1 of 10 the Revi...
k.l. Khera & Ors. Vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 7653/2000 % 1. K.L. KHERA & ORS. ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr.Adv. with Ms. Niyati Patwardhan, Mr. Padma Kumar and Mr. Himanshu Gautam, Advs. versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajesh K. Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Rijul Singh Uppal and Mr. Akhilesh Sagar, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari and Ms. Binisa Mohanty, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT0107.2019 The petitioners are working as Assistant Directors, Deputy Directors and Directors in the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR). Some of them are designated as Documentation Officers (in Library). They have been appointed on different dates. Their pay scales were, initially, upgraded, vide order dated 29th June, 2000, by granting them the pay scales prescribed by the University Grants Commission (UGC), in respect of lecturers, readers/Assistant Professors and Professors employed in universities. ...
Baljeet Singh vs.the Pio, Industrial Training Institute, Jahangir Puri ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: May 21, 2019 Judgment delivered on: July 01, 2019 + W.P.(C) 776/2016 & CM. No.3376/2016 BALJEET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikram Saini, Adv. with Ms. Chhaya Sharma and Mr. Tarun Goyal, Advs. versus THE PIO, INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE, JAHANGIR PURI & ANR Through: Mr. S.K. Tripathi, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Shashank Tiwari, Adv. for R1 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The challenge in this petition is to an order passed by the CIC dated November 24, 2015, whereby the CIC has directed the respondent no.1 herein to provide to the respondent no.2, OBC certificate of the petitioner.2. The challenge to the order is on the ground that respondent no.2 is a neighbor and co-sharer in the property of the petitioner and has no cordial relationship due to a property dispute. Therefore, in order to harass and put pressure on W.P.(C) No.776/2016 Page 1 of 9 petitione...
Shri Sunil Tanwar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:01. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 12060/2018 SHRI SUNIL TANWAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr Jaideep Singh and Mr Hisham Eslam, For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr Kavindra Gill, Mr Aditya Madaan and Mr Srivats Kaushal, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the decision of the respondents to confer the Dronacharya Award, 2018 on respondent No.4 recognizing him as an outstanding coach in the discipline of Athletics. The petitioner further prays that directions be issued to respondent No.2 (Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports) and respondent No.3 (Dronacharya Selection Committee, 2018), to consider the nomination of the petitioner for the said award based on the merit system, as per the scheme f...
M/S Shakti Residency Pvt. Ltd. Vs.sanjiv Anand & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:12. 02.2019 Judgment delivered on:01. 07.2019 FAO(OS) 9/2017 and C.M. No.1265/2017 M/S SHAKTI RESIDENCY PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Chetan Anand and Mr. Akash Kumar Srivastava, Advocates. versus SANJIV ANAND & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dinesh Garg and Ms. Rachna Agrawal, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Jatinderpal Singh, Mr. Mehtab Singh Sandhu and Mr. Pratishth Kaushal, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 25.11.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge in I.A. No.11942/2016, whereby the application of FAO(OS) 9/2017 Page 1 of 29 the appellant (plaintiff in the suit) herein, for a judgment on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 C.P.C., came to be dismissed.2. The app...
Nishant vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI NISHANT STATE ROHIT Reserved on:10. h January, 2019 Decided on:1. t July, 2019 CRL.A. 647/2016 Represented by: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for ..... Respondent the State CRL.A. 924/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Mr. Tanu B. Mishra, Mr. Ravi Mishra, Ms. Harkamal Jeet Kaur, Ms. Roshni Rani and Mr. Gaura Bindal, Advocates STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Nishant and Rohit challenge the impugned judgment dated 26th May, 2016 convicting them for offence punishable under Section 3IPC and the order on sentence dated 30th May, 2016 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and six months each and to pay a fine of 10,000/- each, in default whereof to undergo simple Crl.A.647/2016 & Crl.A.924/2016 Page 1 of 6 imprisonment for a period ...
b.s.methaila vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 3239/2003 % 1. B.S.METHAILA Through: Mr. Jitender Chaudhary and Ms. Shilpa Chohan, Advs. ....... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. N.K. Singh and Ms .Palak Rohmetra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR These proceedings emanate from a charge-sheet, dated 7th June, JUDGMENT0107.2019 2002, issued to the petitioner, and pertaining to a period during which he was employed as Stores Officer in the Netaji Subhash Institute of Technology (Respondent No.2 herein). The charge-sheet contained four Articles of Charge, which may be paraphrased as under: (i) Article I of the Articles of Charge, against the petitioner dealt with an indent, received by the petitioner for procurement of eight Bread Boards, in 1999. The intent was for procuring the boards @ approximately 20,000/- each, on repeat order basis. Even so, it was alleged that the petitioner, by noting dated ...
Dinesh Chandra Mishra vs.dr. Trilochan Mohapatra & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d May, 2019 Pronounced on:01. t July, 2019 + CONT.CAS(C) 944/2018 & CM APPL. Nos. 2607/2019, 4074/2019 & 15302-15304/2019 DINESH CHANDRA MISHRA Through:... Petitioner in Person. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS DR. TRILOCHAN MOHAPATRA & ANR Through: Mr. Gagan Mathur, Advocate % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT1 The petitioner is an employee of the National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources [hereinafter referred to as NBPGR]., an institute of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research [hereinafter referred to as ICAR].. In this contempt petition, his allegation is that the respondents have violated a judgment of this Court dated 11.08.2017 in W.P. (C) 4127 of 2015 by passing an order dated 26.09.2018, transferring him from the headquarters of NBPGR to its farm at Isapur, New Delhi. CONT.CAS(C) 944/2018 Page 1 of 10 2. The petitioner was appointed as a Senior Technical Assistant (Tissue Culture) ...
- ‹ Prev
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- Next ›
- Last »