Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Traffic Media India Pvt. Ltd vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 11.2018 Date of Decision :02. 07.2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 117/2018 TRAFFIC MEDIA INDIA PVT. LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ravi Sikri, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Deepak Yadav, Adv. versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Vibha Mahajan Seth, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 A common judgment has been passed with the lead case being O.M.P. (COMM) 104/2018 titled Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Traffic Media India Pvt. Ltd. For the reasons stated therein, the present petition partially succeeds. The parties shall bear their own costs.2. A copy of the aforesaid order in O.M.P. (COMM) 104/2018 is placed below. JULY02 2019/rv NAVIN CHAWLA, J OMP(Comm.) No.117/2018 Page 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:19. 11.2018 Date of Decision :02. 07.2019 O.M.P. (COMM) 104/2018 & I.A. Nos.3004/2018, 13731/2018 DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner T...
Om Prakash Bhardwaj vs.nityanand Bharadwaj & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:2. d July, 2019 + CM(M) 1446/2018 & CM Appl. 49963/2018 OM PRAKASH BHARDWAJ ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipin Arora and Mr. Shelender Kashyap, Advocates versus NITYANAND BHARADWAJ & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manjeet Singh, Adv. for R-1. Mr. P.N. Dhar, Adv. for R-3. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Adv. for R-2 and 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % 1. The petitioner in the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is the plaintiff no.1 in a partition suit, C.S. No.2875/2016, pending in the court of the Additional District Judge-03, East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. The respondents are his siblings, of whom one brother (Nityanand Bharadwaj, respondent no.1 herein) was also a plaintiff in that suit. The other siblings (respondent nos.2 to 4 herein) were arrayed as defendants in the suit.2. The prayers made by the petitioner in this petition are as follows: CM(M) 1...
Union of India & Ors. Vs.laxman Prasad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. 05.2019 Date of Decision:02. 07.2019 W.P.(C) 5433/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv. with Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Adv. Versus LAXMAN PRASAD Through: Mr. G.S. Lobana, Adv. with Mr. Basab Sengupta, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J1 The present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed by the Union of India, assails the order dated 28.04.2010 passed by the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal) in OA No.2561/2009. The petitioner also assails the order dated 10.03.2014 passed in RA No.80/2013 dismissing the petitioners application seeking review of the order dated 28.04.2010.2. The aforesaid original application (hereinafter referred to as OA) had been preferred by the respondent impugning the penalty of reduction to lower ...
Preetam @ Shrikaran vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. t January, 2019 Decided on:2. d July, 2019 CRL.A. 62/2016 DEEP SINGH @ DEEPLA @ DEEPAK ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Kartichay Mathur, Advocate DHCLSC STATE versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State with SI Manoj Kr. Tomar, PS Mayur Vihar CRL.A. 472/2016 PREETAM @ SHRIKARAN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Aditya Vikram and Mr. Avinash, Advocates DHCLSC STATE & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Manoj Kr. Tomar, PS Mayur Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Deep Singh and Preetam challenge the impugned judgment dated 23rd September 2015 whereby Deep Singh was convicted for offences punishable under SectionsIPC and Preetam was convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 394 IPC and 25 Arms Act and the order on Crl.A.62/2016 & Crl.A.472/2016 Page 1 of 9 sentence dated 29th September 2015 whereby Deep ...
Union of India vs.m/s Om Construction Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :20. h May, 2019 Date of decision :2. d July, 2019 + O.M.P. 728/2009 UNION OF INDIA ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Angad Mehta, Advocate (M:9560956484) versus M/S OM CONSTRUCTION CO. .... Defendant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Amit Choudhary, Mr. Sarthak Mannan & Ms. Kanchan Semwal, Advocates (M:9650279943). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act challenges award dated 3rd May, 2009 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator.2. The Respondent M/s. Om Construction Co. (hereinafter Contractor) was awarded a contract for construction of Government Senior Secondary School at Anand Vihar, Delhi vide agreement No.13/EE/DC&LC/DA/2001-02. As per the contract, the value of the work was estimated at approximately Rs.2.93 crores. The date of commencement of work was 19th October, 2001 and stipulated date of completion was 18th April, 2003. Howeve...
Anita Devi vs. Sukumar Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
+ SUKUMAR YADAV ..... Respondent $~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:2. d July, 2019 CM(M) 548/2018 ANITA DEVI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.B.L.Chawla, Advocate with the husband of the petitioner versus Through: Mr.Omkar Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against an order dated 21.02.2018, by which the petitioners application under Order XV-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [CPC]. has been dismissed.2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in Suit No.12851/2016 pending before the Senior Civil Judge-04 (West), Delhi. She filed the suit against the defendant for possession of the suit property [Ground Floor, WZ-514, New Municipal No.C-99, measuring 40 sq. yds. (approximately), part of Khasra No.1575, situated in the old Lal Dora of Village Tihar, New Delhi-110018].. She also claimed a decree in the sum of 1,12,000/- towards arrears of rent from April, ...
Monu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h May, 2019 Decided on:2. d July, 2019 CRL.A. 985/2016 KAWALJEET SINGH ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Dinesh Malik with Mr. Manish Malik and Mr. Saini, Advocates Akash STATE + MONU STATE ..... Respondent versus Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Ramesh Kumar, PS Nihal Vihar CRL.A. 1123/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Dinesh Malik with Mr. Manish Malik and Mr. Saini, Advocates Akash ..... Respondent versus Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Ramesh Kumar, PS Nihal Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the two appeals, Monu and Kawaljeet Singh challenge the impugned judgment dated 21st April 2016 convicting them for the offence Crl.A.985/2016 & Crl.A.1123/2016 Page 1 of 6 punishable under Sections 3IPC in FIR No.45/2012 registered at PS Nihal Vihar and the order on sentence dated 4th May 2016 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ...
Delhi and District Cricket Association vs.vinod Tihara & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:02. 07.2019 FAO622019 DELHI AND DISTRICT CRICKET ASSOCIATION ..... Appellant VINOD TIHARA & ORS Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates appeared in this case: For the Appellant: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Saurabh Chadha, Mr. Kunal Vats and Mr. Sidharth, Advs. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Sanjeevi Seshadri, Mr. Gaurav Mitra with Mr. Khowaja Siddiqui, Mr. Arup Sinha, Mr. Ashwini Kumar and Ms. Palak Vasisth, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Vikas Kumar Jha and Ms. Ritu Anand Vishwakarma, Adv. for R-2/BCCI Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Saurabh Chadda, Mr. Aditya Awasthi and Mr. Rohit Bhagat, Advs. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J FAO622019, CM APPLs. 7284/2019 and 7286/2019 FACTS:1. This appeal impugns an order dated 02.02.2019 passed by the Learned Addl. District Judge, injuncting the appellant from suspending respondent No.1 (plaintiff) from his post o...
Gammon India Limited vs.national Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :20. h February, 2019 Date of decision :2. d July, 2019 GAMMON INDIA LIMITED O.M.P. 265/2009 ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. J.P. Cama, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Goel, Ms. Tanya Chaudhary, Ms. Malvika Bhanot and Mr. Ishan Nagar, Advocates (M:9654436678) versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Defendants Through: Ms. Kritika Shukla and Ms. Neetica Sharma, Advocates (M:9654156410) O.M.P. 319/2009 & I.A. 7751/2009 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Defendants Through: Ms. Kritika Shukla and Ms. Neetica Sharma, Advocates (M:9654156410) versus GAMMON INDIA LIMITED ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. J.P. Cama, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Goel, Ms. Tanya Chaudhary, Ms. Malvika Bhanot and Mr. Ishan Nagar, Advocates (M:9654436678) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A. 7751/2009 in OMP3192009 1. The present application has been filed by the... Petitioner National Highways Authority of India, for ...
Dr. Rajesh Kapoor vs.delhi Cantonment Board and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: July 01, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3989/2018 & CM. No 15715/2018 DR. RAJESH KAPOOR Through: Mr. Vikas Dhawan and Ms. Kreeti Joshi, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ankur Mishra and Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda, Advs. with Mr. Alkesh Sharma, Officiating Executive Engineer for Delhi Cantonment Board. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: this that The petitioner respectfully prays Honble Court may be pleased to: issue appropriate writ(s), order(s) or I. direction(s) in the nature o Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to, and quash, the order No.DCB/4/UC/RK/SH.Bazar/2017-18 dated 07.03.2018; II. consequently issue appropriate writ(s), W.P.(C) No.3989/2018 Page 1 of 11 in order(s) or direction(s) the nature of Mandamus directing respondent No.1 to de-seal...
- ‹ Prev
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- Next ›
- Last »