Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bankim K. Kulshrestha vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:2. d July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5749/2019 BANKIM K. KULSHRESTHA Through: ........ Petitioner... Petitioner in person versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Piyush Gaur, GP for R-1 Mr. Sidhant Kumar Marvah, Adv. for R-2/ECI Mr. Premsagar Pal for Mr. Rishikesh Kumar,ASC for R-4 CORAM:-"HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT D.N.PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers : (a) Issue any appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) against :1. Swami Sakshi Maharaj (Respondent No.6) A sitting member of parliament belonging to Bharatiya W.P.(C) 5749/2019 Page 1 of 6 Janata Party (BJP) from Parliamentary Constituency Unnao, U.P., and renominated by BJP to contest the election from same seat in ongoing 2019 elections for making patently seditious comment that after 2019 electi...
The State of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary vs.dr. Jitendra Gupta & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h March, 2019 Pronounced on:2. d July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5648/2018 & CM APPL22046 27458 & 32283/2018 THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Devashish Bharukha, Addl. Standing Counsel with Mr. Justine George, Advocate versus DR. JITENDRA GUPTA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed by the State of Bihar, assailing the order passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, dated 22.3.2018, by which the learned Tribunal has allowed the O.A. of respondent No.1 herein and has directed respondent No.2 herein/Union of India to consider the case of the applicant/respondent No.1 for inter-state deputation to the State of Haryana under Rule 5...
Versatile Commotrade Private Limited vs.maniram Sh. Munni Ram Thr Lrs ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d May, 2019 Pronounced on:2. d July, 2019 C.R.P. 234/2017 VERSATILE COMMOTRADE PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Mr. Jai Pratap & Ms. Priyanka Solanki, Advocates. versus MANIRAM SH. MUNNI RAM THR LRS & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Yadav, Ms. Upma Yadav, Advocates % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT1 The revisionist (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) assails an order of the Trial Court dated 17.07.2017, by which the respondents have been granted unconditional leave to defend a suit filed by it under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ("CPC"). The respondents are the legal representatives of the original defendant in the suit. C.R.P. 234/2017 Page 1 of 21 Facts 2. The suit filed by the plaintiff arises out of an agreement dated 30.04.2013, under which one Mani Ram (the original defendant, since deceased) agreed to sell ...
Sitac Pvt Ltd vs.banwari Lal Sons Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 486/2011 & I.A. No.9067/2011 Reserved on:31. 10.2018 Date of decision :02. 07.2019 SITAC PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vinay P.Tripathi and Mr.Abhinav Jaganathan, Advs. versus BANWARI LAL SONS PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Kamaldeep Dayal, Adv. for D-1. Mr.Sonal Sinha and Ms.Aastha Vashistha, Advs. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This suit/petition has been filed by the plaintiff/petitioner under Sections 14(2), 17 and 29 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking a direction for the Arbitrator to file the Arbitral Record and the Arbitral Award dated 25.01.2011 before this Court and making the same a Rule of Court, alongwith decree against respondents awarding Rs.5,35,920/- paid by the petitioner to the Arbitrator as their share of fees as per order dated 21.12.2010.2. Respondent no.1 has filed its objections to the Award under Section 30 and...
Union of India & Anr vs.ram Swarup & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~13 * + Date of Decision:2. 07.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.6946/2019 & CM No.28874/2019 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Shipra Shukla, Advocate Versus RAM SWARUP & ORS. Through: .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners have challenged the impugned order dated 28-11-2018 by virtue of which the Original Application No.2821/2013 was partly allowed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi and the promotion of the respondents to the post of Shunting Master Grade-II was directed to be treated w.e.f. 14-02-2000, the date on which the juniors of the respondents were promoted.2. The respondents were working as Pointsman in the Northern Railway in the year 1999 in the pay scale of Rs. 3050-4590. The next promotion from the post is to that of Shunting Master Grade-II with the pay scale of Rs. 4000- 6000.3. The respon...
Deep Singh @ Deepla @ Deepak vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. t January, 2019 Decided on:2. d July, 2019 CRL.A. 62/2016 DEEP SINGH @ DEEPLA @ DEEPAK ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Kartichay Mathur, Advocate DHCLSC STATE versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State with SI Manoj Kr. Tomar, PS Mayur Vihar CRL.A. 472/2016 PREETAM @ SHRIKARAN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Aditya Vikram and Mr. Avinash, Advocates DHCLSC STATE & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Manoj Kr. Tomar, PS Mayur Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Deep Singh and Preetam challenge the impugned judgment dated 23rd September 2015 whereby Deep Singh was convicted for offences punishable under SectionsIPC and Preetam was convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 394 IPC and 25 Arms Act and the order on Crl.A.62/2016 & Crl.A.472/2016 Page 1 of 9 sentence dated 29th September 2015 whereby Deep ...
Sandeep Kumar vs.satellite Channels Pvt. Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 335/2019 SANDEEP KUMAR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Harshit Sethi & Ms. Kartikeya Singh, Advs. Versus ..... Defendants Through: None. SATELLITE CHANNELS PVT. LTD. & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER0207.2019 IA No.8669/2019 (for exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CS(COMM) No.335/2019, IA No.8670/2019 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC) & IA No.8671/2019 (under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC) 3. Inspite of passover, the arguing counsel is not available.4. Though the filing counsel has sought to argue the matter but in my opinion, the plaint as drafted is not maintainable and is liable to be rejected.5. The plaintiff has instituted this suit against as many as 98 defendants; however the defendants no.37 to 98 are John Doe defendants. In my opinion, even if a John Doe order is sought, there is no need to implead John Doe repeatedly, adding to the bulk of the plaint; one...
National Highways Authority of India vs.gammon India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :20. h February, 2019 Date of decision :2. d July, 2019 GAMMON INDIA LIMITED O.M.P. 265/2009 ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. J.P. Cama, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Goel, Ms. Tanya Chaudhary, Ms. Malvika Bhanot and Mr. Ishan Nagar, Advocates (M:9654436678) versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Defendants Through: Ms. Kritika Shukla and Ms. Neetica Sharma, Advocates (M:9654156410) O.M.P. 319/2009 & I.A. 7751/2009 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Defendants Through: Ms. Kritika Shukla and Ms. Neetica Sharma, Advocates (M:9654156410) versus GAMMON INDIA LIMITED ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. J.P. Cama, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit Goel, Ms. Tanya Chaudhary, Ms. Malvika Bhanot and Mr. Ishan Nagar, Advocates (M:9654436678) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A. 7751/2009 in OMP3192009 1. The present application has been filed by the... Petitioner National Highways Authority of India, for ...
Syed Mehedi vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 05.2019. Date of Decision:02. 07.2019. + W.P.(C) 1200/2016 SYED MEHEDI ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Ashok Agarwal, Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Mr.Tenzing Thinglay & Mr.Kumar Utkarsh, Advs. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel, GNCTD (Services) along with Mr.Nilesh Kumar Singh & Ms.Sakshi Shairwal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J JUDGMENT1 The present writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 05.01.2016 passed by the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi dismissing O.A.No.3805/2014 preferred by the petitioner, wherein he had challenged the respondents rejection of his request to be granted age relaxation in order to qualify for the post of Special Education Teacher in Delhi government schools. W.P.(C) 1200/2016 Page 1 of 26 2. The petitioner,...
Ntpc Limited vs.voith Hydro Joint Venture
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:02. 07.2019 + OMP (COMM) 16/2017 & IA No.528/2017 NTPC LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus VOITH HYDRO JOINT VENTURE Advocates who appeared in these cases: ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner: Mr Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr Ashish Kumar and Ms Shantanu Sharma. For the Respondent: Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate, Mr Ciccu Mukhapadhaya, Sr. Advocate with Mr Omar Ahmad, Mr Vikram Shah and Mr Ishan Gaur. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner (hereafter NTPC) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the A&C Act) impugning the arbitral award dated 23.08.2016 (hereafter the impugned award) rendered by the Arbitral Tribunal (by majority) comprising of Professor Dr. Albert Jan Van Den Berg (Presiding Arbitrator), Mr Michael Black, QC (Co-Arbitrator) and Justice (Retd.) G. N. Ray (Co-Arbitrator). The arbitral award was rend...
- ‹ Prev
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- Next ›
- Last »