Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd. Tasleem Siddiqui & Anr. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 1383/2019 Judgment delivered on:02. 07.2019 MOHD. TASLEEM SIDDIQUI & ANR ........ Petitioners versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Vivek Verma with Mr. Mohd. Riyaz Ahmad Ali, Advocate. Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State with ASI Rohtash, PS Aman Vihar. Ms. Manju Rani, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.382/2016, under Sections 498A/4IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Anand Vihar, Outer District, based on a settlement.2. 3. Subject FIR emanates out of a matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of the respondent No.2 complainant.... Petitioner No.2 is the mother-in-law of the respondent No.2. Father of the petitioner has expired after the regist...
dy.ce/c (Northern Railway) Jammu Tawi vs.m/s Bumi Geo Engineering Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~14 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 240/2019 Date of Decision :2. d July, 2019 DY.CE/C (NORTHERN RAILWAY) JAMMU TAWI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Pragya Sharma, Mr.Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advs. versus M/S BUMI GEO ENGINEERING LTD Through: Nemo ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA86782019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. IA86802019 (delay of 55 days in re-filing the petition) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned and application stands allowed. O.M.P. (COMM) 240/2019 & IA86792019 (Stay) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the Arbitral Award dated 29.10.2018 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in O.M.P. (COMM) 240/2019 Page 1 relation to the works of rectification and rehabilitation of damaged portion of Tunnel No.10 between chainageandlocated b...
Union Bank of India vs.s.k. Dhawan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d July, 2019 LPA8652015 and C.M. Appl. No.28936/2015 (for stay) UNION BANK OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. O.P. Gaggar, Advocate. versus S.K. DHAWAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jaspreet Singh Rai and Mr. Rohit Napal, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGEMENT JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 4.9.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 8216/2002 whereby the learned Single Judge has quashed the report of the Inquiry Officer, penalty order, appellate order as well as the order passed in the review filed by the respondent.2. Brief facts necessary for the present appeal are that the respondent was appointed as a clerk on 1.3.1966 in the appellant-Bank and during the course of his service earned several promotions. Between the period LPA8652015 Page 1 of 17 16.5.1996 and 20.2.1998 ...
Vijay Chhibber and Ors. Vs.delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d July, 2019. CS(OS) 510/2018 VIJAY CHHIBBER AND ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Aditya Wadhwa, Ms. Tejaswi Shetty and Mr. Shreeyash Lalit, Advs. Versus DELHI GYMKHANA CLUB LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Deepak Khosla and Ms. Himani, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.15121/2018 (of the defendant under Order VII Rule 11 CPC). Advs.1. The five plaintiffs, namely Vijay Chhibber, Anupam Dev, Col. Sudhir Manchanda, Amitabh Mathur and S.R. Wadhwa, have instituted this suit for (i) declaration that the Show Cause Notices dated 6th October, 2018 issued by the defendant to the five plaintiffs are unenforceable, illegal and void and not binding on the plaintiffs; and, (ii) permanent injunction restraining the defendant from taking any steps in furtherance of the show cause notices.2. The suit came up first before this Court on 10th October, 2018 when while issuing summons/notice, vide ex parte ad interim or...
Subhash Chandra Agarwal vs.lok Sabha Secretariat & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3491/2013 Reserved on:12. h April, 2019 Date of decision:02. d July, 2019 SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. T. Sudhakar, Advocate. versus LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Advocate with Ms. Gauri Puri, Advocate and Mr.Anand Venkatramani, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.The petitioner, being a citizen of the country, challenges order dated 20.02.2013 made by the Central Information Commission (CIC, for short) dismissing the second appeal preferred by him and order dated 26.03.2013 made by the Secretariat, Lok Sabha, thereby denying certain information sought on the ground that furnishing it would amount to breach of privilege of Parliament and is therefore exempt under section 8(1)(c) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act, for short). W.P.(C) No.3491/2013 page 1 of 83 The factual matrix 2. The matter arises f...
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation vs.traffic Media India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:19. 11.2018 Date of Decision :02. 07.2019 O.M.P. (COMM) 104/2018 & I.A. Nos.3004/2018, 13731/2018 DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Vibha Mahajan Seth, Adv. TRAFFIC MEDIA INDIA PVT. LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ravi Sikri, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Deepak Yadav, Adv. + O.M.P. (COMM) 117/2018 TRAFFIC MEDIA INDIA PVT. LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ravi Sikri, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Deepak Yadav, Adv. versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Vibha Mahajan Seth, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 These petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenging the Arbitral Award dated 29.11.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the License Agreement da...
P N Ramalingam vs.the Chairman Managing Director Itdc and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~ * % + W.P.(C) 10656/2017 P N RAMALINGAM IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:02. d July, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajesh Gupta and Mr.Harpreet Singh, Advocates versus THE CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR ITDC AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anish Chawla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioners wife, Jaya Prada was working as General Manager 1. (Admn.) with ITDC and she superannuated on 30th November, 2010. The petitioners wife expired on 17th October, 2011.2. Vide order dated 19th November, 2010 in Ex.P.13/2007 titled State Bank of India v. N.S. Mehta; the Additional Civil Judge/ARC, Karkardooma District Courts, Delhi directed ITDC not to release a sum of Rs.1,98,271/- out of the retiral benefits of late Jaya Prada.3. Vide order dated 23rd May, 2014 in Ex.P.No.21/2010 titled State Bank of India v. Jaya Prada; the Additional District Judge & Wakf Tribunal, Patiala House District Courts, New Delhi attached the gratuity...
Kawaljeet Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h May, 2019 Decided on:2. d July, 2019 CRL.A. 985/2016 KAWALJEET SINGH ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Dinesh Malik with Mr. Manish Malik and Mr. Saini, Advocates Akash STATE + MONU STATE ..... Respondent versus Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Ramesh Kumar, PS Nihal Vihar CRL.A. 1123/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Dinesh Malik with Mr. Manish Malik and Mr. Saini, Advocates Akash ..... Respondent versus Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Ramesh Kumar, PS Nihal Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the two appeals, Monu and Kawaljeet Singh challenge the impugned judgment dated 21st April 2016 convicting them for the offence Crl.A.985/2016 & Crl.A.1123/2016 Page 1 of 6 punishable under Sections 3IPC in FIR No.45/2012 registered at PS Nihal Vihar and the order on sentence dated 4th May 2016 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ...
Harvinder Singh & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3124/2019 Judgment delivered on:02.07.2019 HARVINDER SINGH & ORS versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ Petitioners ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. V.C. Gautam, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State with Inspr. Asha, CWC Nanak Pura. Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.12851/2019 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3124/2019 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.113/2015, under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Crime (Women) Cell, Nanakpura, based on a settlement.2. Subject FIR emanates out of a matrimonial discord. CRL.M.C. 3124/2019 Page 1 of 3 3.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of the prosecutrix respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.2 is the mother-in-law of the respo...
Lalit Kumar Rawal vs.the Registrar General High Court of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~15 * + Date of Decision:2. 07.2019 % W.P.(C) 6988/2019 LALIT KUMAR RAWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus THE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Advocate for R- 1/DHC. Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Dhruv Pande, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek the quashing of the DO letter dated 26.4.2019 issued to the petitioner by the respondents. The said letter reads as follows:-"Dear Mr. Rawal, W.P.(C.) No.6988/2019 Page 1 of 4 With reference to your representation dated 04.12.2018, I am desired to inform you that the same has been recommended to be rejected. I am further desired to advise you that wherever you are posted, you must work in co-ordination...
- ‹ Prev
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- Next ›
- Last »