Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nikhil Pandey vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~26. * + % W.P.(C.) No.7021/2019 NIKHIL PANDEY Date of Decision:03. 07.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Anisha Upadhyay, Ms.Rajeshwari, Ms. Meenakshi Rawat & Mr. Rajeev Chhetri, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC and Mr.Soumava Karmakar, Advocate along with Lt. Col. Kapil Pandya & Lt. Col. the respondent/ UOI. J.K. Sharma, for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.29288/2019 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C.) No.7021/2019 Page 1 of 6 W.P.(C) 7021/2019 & C.M. No.29287/2019 3. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition seeking the following substantive reliefs: issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or (i) direction to the respondents to withdraw/ set aside the decision of the Review Medical Board taken on 12.06.2019, for the TES ...
Saptahik Merchant Welfare Association (Registered) Through Its Preside ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
$~15. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2024/2018, C.Ms. No.8384/2018, 13558/2018, 18944/2018, 29699/2018, 520/2019, 23825/2019, 23826/2019 & 25325/2018 SAPTAHIK (REGISTERED) THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT SH. A. D. DEHLVI MERCHANT WELFARE ASSOCIATION ........ Petitioner Through Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Ankush Sharma, Advocate. versus THE NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Anjum Javed, ASC-GNCTD with Mr.Devendra Kumar, Mr. Faran Ahmed and Ms.Priti, Advocates for R2-4. Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. for SDMC Ms.Mini Pushkarna, St. Counsel, North DMC with Ms.Shiva Pandey and Ms.Swagata Bhuyan, Advs. Inspector Sudhir Kumar, TI/Darya Ganj, Traffic Circle with SI Ram Tirath, Pairvi Officer, Traffic. Inspector Mahesh Kasana, ATO, PS Jama Masjid. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % ORDER0307.2019 W.P. (C) 2024/2018 Page 1 of 9 C.M. No.10189/2019 (by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation) and C.M. No.29341/2019...
Rameshwar Dayal Gupta vs.sh. Mange Ram Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: May 27, 2019 Pronounced on: July 03, 2019 + CS(OS) 252/2018, CC312018, I.A. 7267/2018 RAMESHWAR DAYAL GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Samar Bansal, Mr. Manan Shishodia and Ms. Pevahuti Pathak, Advocates. SH. MANGE RAM GUPTA versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Rajneesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J I.A. 12997/2018 (application on behalf of the Plaintiff under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC) 1. By way of the present application, the Plaintiff seeks a preliminary decree on the basis of the admissions made by the Defendant.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that, Plaintiff has filed the present suit inter alia, seeking a decree of partition of the residential house bearing No.B-7/33, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi- 110029, consisting of a super structure of built up Ground Floor, First Floor and Barsati Floor and land underneath admeasuring approximately 425 square yards (hereinafter ...
Smt Babita vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
$~9 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :09. h January, 2019 Date of Decision :3. d July, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 437/2014 SMT BABITA Through: Mr. I.V. Raghav, Advocate. Petitioner versus STATE & ORS. ..Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP with SI Ranveer Mavi, PS Anand Vihar Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 & 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 29.4.2014 (hereinafter to be referred as the impugned order) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karkadooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter to be referred as the Appellate Court) in Crl. Appeal No.85/2013, whereby the finding returned by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Karkadooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter to be referred as the Trial Court), vide judgment dated 7.5.2012 in FIR No.325/2000, confirming the acquittal of respondent Nos.2 to 4, has been endorsed, with the prayer to set aside the said impugned order and judgment...
Tangirala Srinivasa Gangadhara Baladitya vs.sanjay Aggarwal, Sole Arbi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
$~20. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA4222019 and CM APPL. 29196-97/2019 1. TANGIRALA SRINIVASA GANGADHARA BALADITYA Through: Mr. R.K. Sarma and Mr. P.V.R. Rao, Advocates ..... Appellant versus SANJAY AGGARWAL, SOLE ARBITRATOR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % The appellant has challenged an order dated 22.05.2019 passed by the ORDER0307.2019 learned Single Judge, dismissing a writ petition filed by him praying inter alia for setting aside an order dated 08.04.2019, passed by the respondent No.1/Sole Arbitrator, turning down an application moved by him under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'A&C Act') in the arbitration proceedings initiated by the respondent No.2/company against him and one Shri Chandra Shekhar Varanasi and holding that the said proceedings are maintainable against him. Vide order dated 22.05.2019, the appellant's petition ha...
A vs.m
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d July, 2019 FAO5062002 & CM No.18768/2009 (u/O VII R-7 CPC) A ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Ms. K. Gayatri, Ms. Aishwarya Anand & Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advs. versus M Through: Mr. Rohit Kumar, Adv. ..... Respondent + MAT.APP. 87/2008 & CMs No.12602/2008 (u/O XLI R-27 AND CPC) & 18763/2009 (u/O VII R-7 CPC) M Through: Mr. Rohit Kumar, Adv. ..... Appellant A versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Ms. K. Gayatri, Ms. Aishwarya Anand & Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 FAO No.506/2002 has been preferred by the appellant husband against the judgment (dated 2nd August, 2002 in HMA No.1103/of the Court of the Additional District Judge, Delhi) of dismissal of his petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The appellant husband had also filed...
Smt. Preeti Maini (Thukral) vs.pawan Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:03. d July, 2019 + CRL.REV.P. 412/2015 & Crl.M.A.9641/2015 (stay) SMT PREETI MAINI(THUKRAL) ........ Petitioner versus PAWAN KUMAR .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Manchanda, Mr.Sanjay Pahwa and Mr.Harish Chawla, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr.Sudeep Kumar Shortriya, Manish K.Gujral and Mr.Prakhar Singh, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner impugns summoning order dated 16.12.2014, whereby the petitioner has been summoned to face trial under Section 499 Indian Penal Code read with Section 500 IPC.2.... Petitioner is the daughter of the sister of the respondent, i.e., his niece. Subject order emanates out of a complaint lodged by the respondent against the petitioner and her husband contending that he is the only son of his parents besides two daughters. He had purchased a property in Prashant Vihar in the name...
Air India Ltd. Vs.sanjay Kaura
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
$~25 & 26 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. d July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 426/2019 & CM No.1942/2019 25 AIR INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna Dwivedi versus Dhingra and Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates. SANJAY KAURA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Inder Jit Singh, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 475/2019 & CM No.2119/2019 26 AIR INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna Dwivedi Dhingra and Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates.1. FG RUNDA. versus Through: Mr. Inder Jit Singh, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the orders dated 10th August, 2018 whereby the learned Industrial Tribunal held that the inquiry conducted by the petitioner was violative of principles of natural justice. Learned Industrial Tribunal directed the petitioner to produce evidence on merits on the charges mentioned in the charge sheet.2. Mr. Lalit Bhasin, learned counsel for the petiti...
India Yamaha Motor Pvt Ltd vs.seema Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d July, 2019 CS(COMM) 725/2017 INDIA YAMAHA MOTOR PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sachin Dutta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Ms. Rijuta Mohanty & Mr. Manmeet Singh Nagpal, Advs. Versus SEEMA BHATIA ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Ms. Sana Ansari & Mr. Zubin Sengh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.8753/2013 (of the plaintiff under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 2095 days in institution of the suit).1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.1,46,59,899/- from the defendant. The suit was accompanied with the application aforesaid under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay in filing thereof.2. The suit came up first before the Joint Registrar on 24th May, 2013, when summons thereof were ordered to be issued.3. 4. The pleadings in the suit and the application were completed. The suit came up before t...
Ravi @ Batu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h May, 2019 Decided on:2. d July, 2019 CRL.A. 1159/2017 RAVI @ BATU ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Naomi Chandra, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with SI Prempal Singh, PS Seelampur CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal, Ravi @ Batu challenges the impugned judgment dated 7th November 2017 convicting him for the offence punishable under Section 397 IPC in FIR No.857/2014 registered at PS Seelampur and the order on sentence dated 9th November 2017 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months.2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that as per the personal search memo nothing has been recovered from the appellant. Moreover, the nature of injury is simple caused due to the scuffle. Hence the appel...
- ‹ Prev
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- Next ›
- Last »