Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manish Sharma vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. d July, 2019 CRL.REV. P. 271/2017 & Crl.M.A.6025/2017 MANISH SHARMA versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. D.N.Goburdhun, Adv. For the Respondent : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Ranveer Mavi, P.S.Anand Vihar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 22.02.2017, whereby, Trial Court has dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under section 227 Criminal Procedure Code seeking a discharge and further directing that the a charge is liable to be framed against the petitioner for the offence mentioned in the charge sheet. Charge Sheet has been filed under Sections 3Indian Penal Code.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated. He submits that there no cogent material on record for trial court to proceed aga...
Larsen & Toubro Limited vs.experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
$~19 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 200/2019 & IA85672019 Date of Decision :3. d July, 2019 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. and Mr.Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra, Mr.Kartik Yadav, Mr.Pranav Vyas, Mr.Samir Malik & Ms.Neha Sarna, Mr.Shantanu Parashar, Advs. versus EXPERION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.P. Chidambaran, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Manish Demla, Mr.Pradyuman Sewar, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner, inter alia, praying for an order of injunction restraining the respondent no.1 from invoking the following Bank Guarantees: O.M.P. (I)(COMM) No.200/2019 Page 1 S. No.Name of the BG No.Bank Date Issuance of Valid upto Current Amount (In Crores) (i) Yes Bank (ii) IDBI Bank Indusln...
Kalyan Health Care Products & Pharmaceuticals Through Yogesh Jindal vs ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:03. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 7010/2019 KALYAN HEALTH CARE PRODUCTS & PHARMACEUTICALS THROUGH YOGESH JINDAL Through: Mr. N.C. Gupta, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel for GNCTD with Mr. Chirag Jain and Mr. Ishan Aggarwal, Advocates. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.29229/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 7010/2019 1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal, at the admission stage itself.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for the disposal of this writ petition are that the respondent No.2 invited an open e-tender for procurement of Ayurvedic and Unani medicines vide NIT dated 20th September, 2018...
Sanjay vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1230/2019 Judgment delivered on:03. 07.2019 SANJAY STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : : For the Respondent Mr.Surya Nath Pandey, Adv. Mr.Amit Chadha, Addl. PP for the State with SI Anita, P.S.Rajouri Garden. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.145/2019 under Section 376 IPC, Police Station Rajouri Garden.2. Subject FIR was registered on a complaint given on 10.04.2019. It is alleged that about three years prior to the making of the complaint, prosecutrix was going to the market for some work, when the petitioner came in his car and told her that he would drop her to the market. It is alleged that the cousin brother of the petitioner also sat in the car despite protests by the prosecutrix. When they reached the market they offered her a cold drink. On drinking wh...
Air Liquide North India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs.indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 322/2017 Reserved on:26. 04.2019 Date of Decision:03. 07.2019 AIR LIQUIDE NORTH INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR ......... Petitioners Through: Mr.Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv. Billimoria, with Mr.Percival Mr.Ankur Kashyap, Mr.S.P. Singh, Mr.Atul Kumar, Ms.Komal Jain and Ms.Mansi Jain, Advs. versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.V.N. Koura, Ms.Mona Aneja and Mr.Nikil Mundeja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioners challenging the Arbitral Award dated 27.03.2017 read with order dated 25.05.2017 making certain corrections therein, passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the agreement executed between the parties for installation of Oxygen and Nitrogen Plant on Build-Own-Operate (BOO) basis by the...
Durgesh S. Kothekar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~4 * + Date of Decision:3. 07.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.6136/2019 DURGESH S. KOTHEKAR ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Kajal Bhatia, Adv. with Mr. A. Karthik, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kamal Kant Jha, Adv. with Mr. Siddharth Jha and Ms. Bakshi Vinit, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.(ORAL) 1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner, inter alia, with the following prayers: a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for records of Order of Removal dated 31.05.2012 and set aside and quash the same; b) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the... RESPONDENTS to re- instate the... Petitioner on account of dispropo...
M vs.A
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d July, 2019 FAO5062002 & CM No.18768/2009 (u/O VII R-7 CPC) A ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Ms. K. Gayatri, Ms. Aishwarya Anand & Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advs. versus M Through: Mr. Rohit Kumar, Adv. ..... Respondent + MAT.APP. 87/2008 & CMs No.12602/2008 (u/O XLI R-27 AND CPC) & 18763/2009 (u/O VII R-7 CPC) M Through: Mr. Rohit Kumar, Adv. ..... Appellant A versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Ms. K. Gayatri, Ms. Aishwarya Anand & Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 FAO No.506/2002 has been preferred by the appellant husband against the judgment (dated 2nd August, 2002 in HMA No.1103/of the Court of the Additional District Judge, Delhi) of dismissal of his petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The appellant husband had also filed...
Central Warehousing Corporation vs.madan Mohan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. d July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1519/2016 & CM APPLN. 6555/2016 CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Tyagi and Mr. Iftekhar Ahmed, Advocates. versus MADAN MOHAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pranav Chadha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the award dated 04th August, 2015 of 1. the Labour Court whereby the Court set aside the order dated 09th July, 1980 of compulsory retirement of the respondent and granted full back wages with all consequential benefits to the respondent till the age of superannuation.2. The respondent was working as a Daftary with the petitioner and he was charged for serious misconduct vide charge sheet dated 28th November, 1975. As per the charge sheet, the respondent attempted to obtain fraudulent payment from the petitioner on the basis of a forged sanction order dated 02nd June, 1975 and he lacked integrity. The respon...
Air India Ltd. Vs.fg Runda.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
$~25 & 26 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. d July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 426/2019 & CM No.1942/2019 25 AIR INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna Dwivedi versus Dhingra and Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates. SANJAY KAURA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Inder Jit Singh, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 475/2019 & CM No.2119/2019 26 AIR INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna Dwivedi Dhingra and Ajay Pratap Singh, Advocates.1. FG RUNDA. versus Through: Mr. Inder Jit Singh, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the orders dated 10th August, 2018 whereby the learned Industrial Tribunal held that the inquiry conducted by the petitioner was violative of principles of natural justice. Learned Industrial Tribunal directed the petitioner to produce evidence on merits on the charges mentioned in the charge sheet.2. Mr. Lalit Bhasin, learned counsel for the petiti...
Dabur India Ltd. Vs.emami Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
* + CS(COMM) 1074/2018 DABUR INDIA LTD. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h May, 2019 Pronounced on:3rd July, 2019 ..... Plaintiff EMAMI LIMITED Through: Mr. Hemant Singh, Advocate with Mr. Manish Kumar Mishra and Ms.Akansha Singh, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, ..... Defendant Ms. Roohina Dua, Mr. Anirudh Bakhru and Mr.Cheitanya Madan, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J I.A Nos. 10869/2018 (under Order 39 Rule 1,2 CPC), 16105/2018 (under Order 39 Rule 1,2 CPC), 3084/2019 ( under Order 39 Rule 1,2,2A CPC) & 16106/2018 (under Section 151 CPC) 1. The afore-noted applications seeking ad-interim injunctions are being disposed of by this common order. By way of these applications, the Plaintiff seeks an order for restraining the Defendant from broadcasting, publishing and printing the advertisements that are subject matter of the CS (COMM) 1074/2018 Page 1 of 41 present suit. Proceedings in the Suit 2. Along with the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- Next ›
- Last »