Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jammu and Kashmir State Agro Industries Development Corporation Ltd & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~7 * + Date of Decision:04. 07.2019 % LPA No.415/2013 JAMMU AND KASHMIR STATE AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD & ANR Through: Mr. Rohit Singha, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus SH RAM AWADH Through: Mr. M. Tarique Siddiqui, Ms. Reetika and Mr. Aamir Zaidi, ..... Respondent Gupta Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. appellant-Jammu The and Kashmir State Agro Industries Development Corporation Ltd assails the judgment dated 14.12.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) 2877/2011. The learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition preferred by the respondent and held that the respondent who was appointed as a Senior Store Keeper, was entitled to pay-scale of 300-650. The appellant has been directed to place the respondent in the said pay scale from the date of his appointment i.e 14.8.1980. The appellant has also been directed to pay...
Sunil Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RAJ KUMAR. Reserved on:5. h April 2019 Decided on:4. h July, 2019 CRL.A. 922/2017 Represented by: Mr. R.N. Sharma and Ms. ..... Appellant versus Sonia, Advocates. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 950/2017 Represented by: Mr. Purvesh Buttan and Mr. ..... Appellant Fahad Imtiaz, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 976/2017 Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant + SATISH STATE + ISLAM STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 922/2017 & conn. matters Page 1 of 40 + CRL.A. 980/2017 MOHD. ZAIKI Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for ...
Jigyasa Jain & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) 5447/2019 & CM APPL. 28313-28314/2019 Judgment reserved on:02. 07. 2019 JIGYASA JAIN & ORS Date of decision :04. 07.2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikrant Pachnanda and Mr. Nipun Katyal, Ms. Naina Pachnanda, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. AK Sharma, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Arjun Mitra, Adv. for IIT, Roorkee, JEE (Advanced) + W.P.(C) 5701/2019 And MS. TARINI SHRIVASTAVA THROUGH HER FATHER SHRI SANJEEV SHRIVASTAVA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Ms. Shruti Dutt, Adv. for R- 1/MHRD Mr. Amit Bansal, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Arjun Mitra, Adv. with Prof. Kaushik Ghosh for IIT Roorkee (JEE Advanced) WP (C) 5447 & 5701/2019 Page 1 of 26 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioners of WP (C) 5447/2019 and the petitioners of WP (C) 5701/2019 vide their petitions filed on...
Sunil Yadav & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3150/2019 SUNIL YADAV & ORS. Date of Order: July 04, 2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ranjit Singh, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional ........ RESPONDENTS Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Jaswant Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 12966/2019 Delay of 132 days in re-filing the accompanying petition is condoned for the reasons stated in the application. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3150/2019 & Crl.M.A. 12967/2019 Quashing of FIR No.202/2015 under Sections 323/354/506/498A/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Palam Village, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 16th October, 2018 of respondent No.2/complainant and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now Crl.M.C. 3150/2019 Page 1 of 3 stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public...
Prem Chand Sagar vs.brm Lease & Credit Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 07.2019 CRL.REV.P. 214/2019 PREM CHAND SAGAR ........ Petitioner versus BRM LEASE & CREDIT PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent None. : : Mr. Harinath Ram, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 214/2019 & Crl.M.A.4059/2019 (leave to compound offence), Crl.M.A.5739/2019 (seeking waiver of cost) 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 19.12.2018 whereby the appeal of the petitioner impugning judgment dated 19.03.2018 was dismissed.2.... Petitioner has been convicted under Section 138 of the CRL.REV.P.214/2019 Page 1 of 3 Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months and also to pay a fine in the sum of Rs. 1,25,000/- as compensation to the complainant.3. 4. Subject cheque was for Rs. 1 lakh. Parties have settled their disputes.... ...
Glaxo Group Limited vs.huk Natural Private Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 337/2019 GLAXO GROUP LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Preetesh Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sujata Chaudhri, Ms. Deeksha Anand, Ms. Urfee Roomi and Mr. Vishesh Kumar, Advs. Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW HUK NATURAL PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. Through: None. ..... Defendants ORDER0307.2019 % IA No.8736/2019 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. IA No.8735/2019 (u/O XI R-1(4) CPC) 3. For the reasons stated, the plaintiff is permitted to file the additional documents latest with the replication, if any.4. The application is disposed of. CS(COMM) 337/2019 & IAs No.8733/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 8734/2019 (u/O XXVI R-9 & u/O XXXIX R-7 CPC) 5. The plaintiff has sued the two defendants, namely Huk Natural Private Limited and Hemendra Kumar, for permanent injunction restraining infringement of Trade Mark and passing off and for ancillary reliefs. CS(COMM) 337/2019 P...
Superon Schweisstechnik India Limited vs.d & H India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
$~OS-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:03. 07.2019 CS(COMM) 665/2017 SUPERON SCHWEISSTECHNIK INDIA LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Sanjeev Singh and Mr.D.K.Yadav, Advs. versus D & H INDIA LIMITED Through Ms.Girija Krishan Varma, Adv. ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) OA No.58/2019 1. By this appeal the appellant/defendant seeks to impugn the order dated 25.4.2019 passed by the learned Joint Registrar allowing the IA No.10990/2018. The accompanying suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from selling offering for sale, advertising or displaying directly or indirectly in any other manner or mode welding electrodes and all allied and cognate goods/products under the trademark/label SUPERCROME or any other trademark/label dress identical with or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs trademark SUPERON.2. The plaintiff filed the said application under Order ...
Haresh Kumar Laxman Bhai & Co. & Ors. Vs.commissioner of Trade & Taxes ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * 18 + HARESH KUMAR LAXMAN BHAI & CO. & ORS. ........ Petitioners W.P.(C) 9308/2018 & CM408192018 Through: Mr Virag Tiwari, Mr K.J.Bhai, Mr Ramesh Johri and Mr Ramashish, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Gautam Narayan, CGSC for GNCTD with Ms Shivani Vig and Ms Dacchita Shalu, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER0307.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This petition has been filed at the instance of 7... Petitioners seeking release of the goods that were seized by the... RESPONDENTS i.e. the Commissioner of Trade and Taxes (CTT) (Respondent No.1) in the Department of Tarde and Taxes (DT&T), Government of the NCT of Delhi, and the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Respondent No.2) on 1st Mach, 2014.2. In the earlier round of litigation, this Court had passed a detailed judgment in W.P.(C) No.3799/2014 (Hari Rai and Ors. v. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes) on 12th Februar...
Consortium of M/S Rcube Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Delhi Metro Rail Cor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:3. d July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 702/2019 CONSORTIUM OF M/S RCUBE PROJECTS PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. Jitender Vohra, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus M/S DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Somya Suman, Mr. Sushant Tripathi and Ms. Vibha Mahajan, Advocates for DMRC Mr. Naveen Kumar Raheja, Advocate for M/s Pacific Development Company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.3075/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 702/2019 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved by a communication dated 28.12.2018 issued by the respondent whereby the technical bid of the petitioner-consortium in respect of W.P.(C) 702/2019 Page 1 of 4 Tender Reference No.CPD-48, Tender ID2018DMRC_362079_1, titled as Property Development at Jasola Apollo Plot of DMRC, has...
Dinesh Chandra Mishra vs.india Council of Agriculture Research & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ 8 * + Date of Decision:03. 07.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.6581/2019 DINESH CHANDRA MISHRA ........ Petitioner... Petitioner in person. Through: Versus INDIA COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURE RESEARCH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM No.27785/2019 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C.) No.6581/2019 & CM No.27786/2019 1. The petitioner who appears in person assails the order dated 14.2.2019 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.2435/2018. The Tribunal has rejected the said Original Application preferred by the petitioner. The petitioner had preferred the said application to seek a direction to the respondents to admit him for the Ph.D in the discipline of Plant Genetic Resources under Departmental (Technical) quota for the academic session 2018-2019 at the respondents...
- ‹ Prev
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- Next ›
- Last »