Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajender vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RAJ KUMAR. Reserved on:5. h April 2019 Decided on:4. h July, 2019 CRL.A. 922/2017 Represented by: Mr. R.N. Sharma and Ms. ..... Appellant versus Sonia, Advocates. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 950/2017 Represented by: Mr. Purvesh Buttan and Mr. ..... Appellant Fahad Imtiaz, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 976/2017 Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant + SATISH STATE + ISLAM STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 922/2017 & conn. matters Page 1 of 40 + CRL.A. 980/2017 MOHD. ZAIKI Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for ...
Paavani Gupta vs.central Board of Secondary Educaiton
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 7062/2019 PAAVANI GUPTA ........ Petitioner Date of Decision:4. h July, 2019 Through Mr. V. K. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay Gupta, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Ruchira Gupta and Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocates. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCAITON ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Bansal, Standing Counsel with Ms. Seema Dolo, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Mr. Amit Bansal, appears on behalf of the respondent on advance notice. Heard.2. Vide the present petition the petitioner seeks that the respondent be directed to re-evaluate the marks obtained by the petitioner, in her class 12th CBSE AISSCE afresh examination from an independent evaluator. W.P.(C) 7062/2019 Page 1 of 9 3. During the course of oral submissions that had been now made on behalf of the petitioner it is submitted that the petitioner does not seek appointment of any independent evaluator by the respondent but seeks that the Court may ap...
Chandan Singh vs.prasar Bharti and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:04. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 1574/2019 & CM APPL. 7295/2019 CHANDAN SINGH Through:... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner versus PRASAR BHARTI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Mr. Anmol Nag, Mr. Rajat Krishna and Mr. Saket Chandra, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Ashim Sood, CGSC with Mr.Rhythm B., Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby directing the respondent No.1 to implement the order dated 22.12.2017 of the Chief Commissioner of Persons with Disabilities and grant appointment to the post of Multi-Tasking (Non-Technical) Staff at par with other candidates.2. The brief facts of the case are that on 26.02.2013, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment issued guidelines vide office Memorandum No.W.P.(C) 1574/2019 Page 1 of 16 16-110/2003-DD.III for conducting written examination for the persons with d...
mohd.chand vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 87/2010 MOHD.CHAND Date of decision: July 4, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sindhu Sinha, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) State. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. G.M.Farooqui, APP for the CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.By the instant regular appeal under Section 374 Cr.P.C., the appellant, who is convicted of the offences under SectionIPC and sentenced to undergo 7 years RI for the offence under Section 376 IPC besides fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo 3 months SI for the offence under Section 376 IPC, assails the impugned judgment of conviction dated 08.12.2009 and order of sentence dated 19.12.2009 passed by the learned ASJ, District- South. Here itself, it may be noted that though the appellant is also convicted of the offence under Section CRL. A. 87/2010 Page 1 of 12 506 IPC, no separate sentence for the commission of the said offence, has been awarded by the Trial Court.2....
Suresh Yadav vs.state and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:4. h July, 2019 W.P. (CRL.) 1387/2019 SURESH YADAV Represented by: Mr.Lokesh Khanna, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus STATE AND OTHERS ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition, the petitioner, who is the complainant in case FIR No.294/2013, under Sections 326-A/34 IPC registered at P.S. Punjabi Bagh challenges the order dated 8th February, 2019 whereby the learned Trial Court, on an application filed by the accused recalled the petitioner/complainant/victim for cross examination.2. The case of the petitioner/complainant is that she is the victim of acid attack and despite having appeared on number of dates and having been examined and cross examined extensively, when the learned counsel for the accused was not present, her further cross examination was closed vide order dated 12th September, 2018, however, for no rhyme an...
Namita Sharma & Anr. Vs.jag Mohan Ahuja & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :4. h July, 2019 + CS (OS) 243/2019 NAMITA SHARMA & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Anshul Mittal and Mr. Harshit Advocates. Vashisht, (M:9899220567) Versus JAG MOHAN AHUJA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Counsel (attendance slip not given) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.As. 6600/2019 (u/O XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC) & 8417/2019 (u/O XXXIX Rule 4 CPC) 1. Present suit has been preferred by the Plaintiffs namely Ms. Namita Sharma and Naval Khanna. The Plaintiffs are the children of Late Shri Daulat Ram Ahuja. The Plaintiffs seek permanent injunction and partition of two properties i.e. (a) E-285, Naraina Vihar, New Delhi-110028 admeasuring 300 sq. yards and (b) shop bearing No.6045, Gali Matke Wali, Sadar Bazar, Delhi.2. Late Shri Daulat Ram Ahuja had a brother namely Mr. Jag Mohan Ahuja, who is Defendant No.1. The Plaintiffs themselves had three brothers namely Mr. Naveen Ahuja, Mr. Sunil Ahuj...
Surender Talwar vs.idbi Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~5 * + Date of Decision:4. 7.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.6921/2019 & CM No.28784/2019 SURENDER TALWAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Harsh Kumar and Mr. Aditya Awasthi, Advocates. Versus Through: Mr. Rajive R. Raj, Advocate and Mr. .....Respondent IDBI BANK CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR Rohit Mehra, AGM, for respondent VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition to assail the order dated 25.6.2019 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (DRAT) in Miscellaneous Appeal No.295/2019 as well as the order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal in S.A. No.118/2019.2. The brief background of the case is that the petitioner claims to be an agreement purchaser of the property bearing No.62, Third Floor, East End Enclave, Delhi-110092 from the borrower Mr. Harish Aggarwal. The borrower took a loan from the respondent bank an...
Max Healthcare Institute Ltd vs.sahrudya Health Care Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h July, 2019 CS(COMM) NO.866/2016 MAX HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manish Dhir, Adv. Versus SAHRUDYA HEALTH CARE PVT. LTD. .....Defendant Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Swathi Sukumar & Ms. Surya Rajappan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.8439/2016 (of the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908) 1. The plaintiff instituted this suit, to (i) restrain the defendant from providing any services under the name MAXCURE HOSPITAL / MAXKURE / MAXCURE MEDICITI or any other mark / name which is a fraudulent or obvious imitation of or deceptively or confusingly similar to the plaintiffs trade mark MAX / MAX HOSPITAL; (ii) restrain the defendant from, by using the name MAXCURE HOSPITAL / MAXKURE / MAXCURE MEDICITI, pass off its services / projects, as that of the plaintiff; and, (iii) for ancilla...
Parveen Goyal vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RAJ KUMAR. Reserved on:5. h April 2019 Decided on:4. h July, 2019 CRL.A. 922/2017 Represented by: Mr. R.N. Sharma and Ms. ..... Appellant versus Sonia, Advocates. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 950/2017 Represented by: Mr. Purvesh Buttan and Mr. ..... Appellant Fahad Imtiaz, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 976/2017 Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant + SATISH STATE + ISLAM STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 922/2017 & conn. matters Page 1 of 40 + CRL.A. 980/2017 MOHD. ZAIKI Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for ...
Overseas Health Care Pvt. Ltd vs.ministry of Health & Family Welfare & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6523/2019 & CM Nos. 27574/2019 & 29518/2019 M/S EUROKEM LABORATORIES (P) LTD. AND ANR. Through: Ms Amita Gupta, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Kirtiman Singh, Mr Shruti Dutt, Mr Prateek Dhanda, Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocates for R1. Mr Rishikant Singh, Advocate for R2.6. + W.P.(C) 4672/2019 OVERSEAS HEALTH CARE PVT. LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Amita Gupta, Advocate. versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE & ANR Through: Mr Rishi Kant Singh, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU W.P. (C) 6523/2019 & 4672/2019 Page 1 of 12 % ORDER0407.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners are engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of drugs. They have filed the present petitions being, essentially, aggrieved by the amendment to the Indian Pharmacopoeia regarding the standards for Albendazole Tablets as intr...
- ‹ Prev
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- Next ›
- Last »