Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rtdc Limited vs.m/s Luxury Trains Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h July, 2019 CS (OS) 3877/2014 & I.As. 1476/2017, 1478/2017, 1479/2017, 1481/2017 RTDC LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Shafiq Khan & Ms. Sundri, Advocates (M-9910000574) Versus M/S LUXURY TRAINS PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Vijay Shankar, Advocate for D-2 (M-9871064894, D/354/08). Mr. Saurabh. S. Sinha & Mr. Shikhar Sareen, Advs. (M- 9560168819) for D-4 CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The Plaintiff, Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation (hereinafter, RTDC), has filed the present suit under Order XXXVII CPC seeking recovery of a sum of Rs.2,07,80,949/-, comprising of Rs.1,85,80,949/- as principal amount and Rs.22,00,000/- as interest.2. RTDCs case is that Defendant No.1 is M/s Luxury Trains Pvt. Ltd, which is engaged in the business of arranging/booking of luxury trains. Its promotee and Director, Mr. Sajivve Trehaan is Defendant No.2. Mr. Rohen Trehaan, son of Mr...
Mohd. Zaiki vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RAJ KUMAR. Reserved on:5. h April 2019 Decided on:4. h July, 2019 CRL.A. 922/2017 Represented by: Mr. R.N. Sharma and Ms. ..... Appellant versus Sonia, Advocates. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 950/2017 Represented by: Mr. Purvesh Buttan and Mr. ..... Appellant Fahad Imtiaz, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 976/2017 Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant + SATISH STATE + ISLAM STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 922/2017 & conn. matters Page 1 of 40 + CRL.A. 980/2017 MOHD. ZAIKI Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for ...
M/S Eurokem Laboratories (P) Ltd. And Anr. Vs.ministry of Health and F ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6523/2019 & CM Nos. 27574/2019 & 29518/2019 M/S EUROKEM LABORATORIES (P) LTD. AND ANR. Through: Ms Amita Gupta, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Kirtiman Singh, Mr Shruti Dutt, Mr Prateek Dhanda, Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocates for R1. Mr Rishikant Singh, Advocate for R2.6. + W.P.(C) 4672/2019 OVERSEAS HEALTH CARE PVT. LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Amita Gupta, Advocate. versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE & ANR Through: Mr Rishi Kant Singh, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU W.P. (C) 6523/2019 & 4672/2019 Page 1 of 12 % ORDER0407.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners are engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of drugs. They have filed the present petitions being, essentially, aggrieved by the amendment to the Indian Pharmacopoeia regarding the standards for Albendazole Tablets as intr...
Hare Ram Singh vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 04, 2019 CRL.M.C. 5375/2017 & CRL.M.A. 21013/2017 HARE RAM SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Rekha Aggarwal & Ms. Sugandha Aggarwal, Advocates with petitioner in person Versus STATE & ORS. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor with SI Pramod Kumar... RESPONDENTS No.2 to 5 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.84/2017, under Sections 288/337/304A IPC, registered at police station North Avenue, New Delhi on the basis of Settlement Deed of 28th October, 2017 (Annexure P-2).... RESPONDENTS No.2 and 3 are the parents of deceased Bardani and respondent No.4 is the widow of Bare Lal Ahirwar, who were employed by petitioner-Contractor for removing debris and had unfortunately died due to accidental fall from top floor of the construction site. Respondent No.5 is the first-informant / complainant of FIR in question. Crl.M.C. 5375/2017 P...
The Vishwa Nath & Santosh Bakshi Charitable Educational Trust (Regd.) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h July, 2019 CS(OS) 119/2019 THE VISHWA NATH & SANTOSH BAKSHI CHARITABLE EDUCATIONAL TRUST (REGD.) & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi & Mr. Sangeeth Mohan, Advs. Versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan & Ms. Dacchita Shahi & Ms. Shivani Vij, Advs. for GNCTD. Mr. Akshay Makhija, Adv., Amicus Curiae. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The Vishwa Nath and Santosh Bakshi Charitable Educational Trust (Regd.) and its Trustee Sharad Malik have instituted this proceeding (as a suit) under Section 7(1) of the Charitable & Religious Trusts Act, 1920 (CRT Act) read with principles of Section 34 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, pleading that (i) plot no.6/22, Shanti Niketan, New Delhi ad-measuring 393 sq. yds. was allotted by Delhi Development Authority (DDA) in equal shares to Vishwa Nath Bakshi and his wife Santosh Bakshi who were members of Government Servants Co-operative House Building...
Satish vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RAJ KUMAR. Reserved on:5. h April 2019 Decided on:4. h July, 2019 CRL.A. 922/2017 Represented by: Mr. R.N. Sharma and Ms. ..... Appellant versus Sonia, Advocates. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 950/2017 Represented by: Mr. Purvesh Buttan and Mr. ..... Appellant Fahad Imtiaz, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 976/2017 Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant + SATISH STATE + ISLAM STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 922/2017 & conn. matters Page 1 of 40 + CRL.A. 980/2017 MOHD. ZAIKI Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for ...
Minor X vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 07.2019 CRL.REV.P. 23/2019 & Crl.M.A.353/2019 (stay) MINOR X versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Zishaan Iskandari with Mr. Ali Chaudhary, Advocates. For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. SI Imran Khan, PS Mundka Mr. Tej Pratap, Advocate for respondent No.2. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT CRL.REV.P. 23/2019 & Crl.M.A.353/2019 (stay) 1.... Petitioner (child victim) impugns order dated 20.11.2018, whereby, the Trial Court has framed charges against the accused/respondent No.2 under Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act 2012 .2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the observations in the medical report of the petitioner, it was evident that there was penetrative sexual assault, as specified in Sec...
Pilluwa @ Pappu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~R-4A IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.235/2019 Decided on:-"4th July, 2019 PILLUWA @ PAPPU ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Sulaiman Mohd. Khan, Advocate (DHCLSC) and Ms. Taiba Khan and Mr. Ashish Choudhary, Advocates versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By judgment dated 15.11.2018 the Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) presiding over the special court under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) in Sessions Case No.440657/2016, the appellant was held guilty and convicted on the charge for offence under section 6 read with section 5(n) of POCSO Act. By subsequent order dated 22.11.2018, the trial court awarded rigorous imprisonment for twelve years with fine of Rs.10,000/- as the punishment against the appellant directing that in the event of default in payment of fine he would undergo further simple imprisonment for two months though affording to him...
Kishan Chand Verma vs.state Thr. c.b.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~3 & 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 788/2000 Decided on:-"4th July, 2019 KISHAN CHAND VERMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudarshan Rajan and Md. Qamar, Advocates versus STATE THR. C.B.I. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel, SPP, CBI with Mr. Dushyant Sarna, Advocate + CRL.A. 795/2000 and Crl. M.A. 384/2011 PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudarshan Rajan and Md. Qamar, Advocates versus STATE THR. C.B.I. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel, SPP, CBI with Mr. Dushyant Sarna, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants Pawan Kumar Sharma (A1) and Kishan Chand Verma (A2) were employed with Delhi Development Authority (DDA) in the capacity of Junior Engineer (JE) during Crl. Appeal Nos.788/2000 & 795/2000 Page 1 of 17 the year 1994. On 22.09.1994, they were arrested by Inspector RVS Lohmor (PW6) of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the course of investigation into first information report (FIR) vide R...
Rukma Singh vs.state (Govt. Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. h July, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 125/2017 RUKMA SINGH versus STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Amandeep Singh with Mr. Pradeep Derodya, Advocates. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1... Petitioner impugns order on charge dated 18.11.2016, whereby the trial court has held that charges are liable to be framed against the petitioner under section 3IPC and section 23 of Juvenile Justice Act (hereinafter referred to as the JJ Act).2. The case of the prosecution is that the prosecutrix, who was a minor girl, was brought from Assam by one Raj Kumar Thakur alluring her to get her a job and kept her in his house where he sexually assaulted her. It is alleged that later one Raju chaudhary, CRL.REV.P. 125/2017 Page 1 of 8 friend of Raj Kuma...
- ‹ Prev
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- Next ›
- Last »