Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Goyal Mg Gases Private Limited vs.panama Iinfrastructure Developers Pr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~8 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 07.2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 235/2019 1. GOYAL MG GASES PRIVATE LIMITED ....... Petitioner Through Mr. Vikas Aggarwal and Mr. Anshu Mahajan, Advs. versus PANAMA IINFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Through None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act).2. Via the instant petition challenge is laid to an order dated 14.5.2019 passed by the learned Arbitrator.3. The learned Arbitrator vide order dated 14.5.2019 has disposed of the petitioners (who is the original claimant) application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short CPC). Though the provisions of CPC are not applicable to arbitration proceedings as is evident upon a perusal of the provisions of Section 19 of the 1996 Act, I would assume that the petitioner sought to invoke v...
Pravesh Sharma & Ors vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 05, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4607/2017 PRAVESH SHARMA & ORS Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate .....Petitioners versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Naresh Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.117/2017 under Sections 308/324/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Jafrabad, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 9th October, 2017 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by ASI Naresh, on the basis of identity proof produced by him. Respondent No....
Balbir Sher Gill vs.state of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h July, 2019. TEST.CAS. 94/2008 & CCP(O)No.22/2010 BALBIR SHER GILL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rana Ranjit Singh, Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, Ms. Akanksha Singh and Mr. Keshav Chaturvedi, Advs. Versus * % + STATE OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak K. Vijay, Ms. Neeru Sharma and Mr. Mandip Singh, Advs. for R-2 to 5. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. for R-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The petition has been filed seeking probate of the document dated 15th October, 1976 as the validly executed last Will of the deceased Teja Singh son of S. Hakim Singh, last resident of 27, Model Town, Delhi, who died on 30th December, 1976.2. This petition was instituted on 25th September, 2008 i.e. after 32 years of the demise of the deceased.3. The petitioner is one of the five sons of the deceased. The other sons namely Dalbir Singh, Satnam Singh, Prithvipal Singh and Kartar Singh have been impleaded as resp...
Islam vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RAJ KUMAR. Reserved on:5. h April 2019 Decided on:4. h July, 2019 CRL.A. 922/2017 Represented by: Mr. R.N. Sharma and Ms. ..... Appellant versus Sonia, Advocates. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 950/2017 Represented by: Mr. Purvesh Buttan and Mr. ..... Appellant Fahad Imtiaz, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 976/2017 Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant + SATISH STATE + ISLAM STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 922/2017 & conn. matters Page 1 of 40 + CRL.A. 980/2017 MOHD. ZAIKI Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for ...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd vs.jarina Begum & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~ * % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO2272016 & CM APPLN. 18786/2016 Date of Decision:04. h JULY, 2019 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr.Siddharth and Mr.Amit Kumar Agrawal, Advocates versus JARINA BEGUM & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.S.N. Parashar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The appellant has challenged the order dated 25th January, 2016 whereby the Commissioner, Employees Compensation awarded compensation of Rs.3,38,880/- along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum to the respondents.2.... RESPONDENTS No.1 to 10 are the widow, mother, four sons and four daughters of late Nisar Ahmad @ Nisar Khan who was working as a cleaner/helper with respondent No.11 on his vehicle.... RESPONDENTS No.1 to 10 filed an application for compensation before the Commissioner, Employees Compensation on the averments that Nisar Ahmad was in the employment of respondent No.11 as a cleaner/helper on truck No.HR-38-N- 4...
Ram Bhool vs.d.t.c.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~5 * % + W.P.(C) 7408/2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:04. h July, 2019 1. RAM BHOOL D.T.C. Through: Dr. N. Gautam and Ms. Swati Gautam, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus Through: Ms. Manisha Tyagi, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby the termination of the petitioner by the respondent was upheld.2. The petitioner joined the respondent as Assistant Fitter on 25th June, 1982. On 05th February, 1993, the petitioner was served with a charge sheet alleging absence from the duty without prior permission from 27th October, 1992 to 20th November, 1992 and again from January, 1992 to 25th October, 1992 and he neither sought any prior permission nor submitted any application for 22 out of 121 days.3. The respondent conducted an enquiry which resulted in the enquiry report dated 09th March, 1993. The enquiry officer held the petitioner guilty of unaut...
Pawan Kumar Sharma vs.state Thr. c.b.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~3 & 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 788/2000 Decided on:-"4th July, 2019 KISHAN CHAND VERMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudarshan Rajan and Md. Qamar, Advocates versus STATE THR. C.B.I. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel, SPP, CBI with Mr. Dushyant Sarna, Advocate + CRL.A. 795/2000 and Crl. M.A. 384/2011 PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudarshan Rajan and Md. Qamar, Advocates versus STATE THR. C.B.I. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel, SPP, CBI with Mr. Dushyant Sarna, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants Pawan Kumar Sharma (A1) and Kishan Chand Verma (A2) were employed with Delhi Development Authority (DDA) in the capacity of Junior Engineer (JE) during Crl. Appeal Nos.788/2000 & 795/2000 Page 1 of 17 the year 1994. On 22.09.1994, they were arrested by Inspector RVS Lohmor (PW6) of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the course of investigation into first information report (FIR) vide R...
Raj Kumar vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RAJ KUMAR. Reserved on:5. h April 2019 Decided on:4. h July, 2019 CRL.A. 922/2017 Represented by: Mr. R.N. Sharma and Ms. ..... Appellant versus Sonia, Advocates. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 950/2017 Represented by: Mr. Purvesh Buttan and Mr. ..... Appellant Fahad Imtiaz, Advocates. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 976/2017 Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant + SATISH STATE + ISLAM STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashish, PS S.B. Dairy CRL.A. 922/2017 & conn. matters Page 1 of 40 + CRL.A. 980/2017 MOHD. ZAIKI Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for ...
Sanjay Mahalwal vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 07.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1476/2019 SANJAY MAHALWAL versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner . For the Respondent : : Mr. Jitender Tyagi with Mr. K.D. Pandey, Advocates. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Avdhesh Dixit, PS Saket. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail for a period of two months in case FIR No.1213/2015 under Sections 363/376D/34 IPC and 6 POCSO, Police Station Saket.2.... Petitioner seeks interim bail on the ground that his grandfather is virtually on his last stage and there is no other male member in the family to take care of the grandfather. It is contended that the younger brother of the petitioner is studying engineering and lives in a hostel.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was earlier also granted...
Gail (India) Limited vs.vrc Construction (India) Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2019
$~31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 243/2019 & I.A.Nos. 8744, 8746/2019 Date of Decision :4. h July, 2019 GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG with Ms.Gunjan Arora, Mr.Niteen Sinha and Ms.Anindita Deka, Advs. versus VRC CONSTRUCTION (INDIA) PVT. LTD..... Respondent Through: Mr.J.P. Sengh,Sr. Adv. with Mr.Manoj Kumar Das, Mr.Deepak Kumar, Mr.Shashi Pratap Singh, Mr.Zubin Sengh and Ms.Manisha Mehta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) This petition under Section 34 of 1. the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 15.03.2019 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Fax of Acceptance (FOA) dated 31.12.2012 issued by the petitioner whereby the tender of the respondent for construction of Additional Buildings/Facilities in To...
- ‹ Prev
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- Next ›
- Last »