Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Meenu Jain vs.delhi Development Authority Through Its Vice Chairman Vi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~7, 13, 14 and 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:05. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 6842/2019 and C.M. Appl. No.28545/2019 (for stay) NITIN KUMAR GARG ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lovish Sharma and Mr. Gobind Malhotra, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 6818/2019 ROMI GUPTA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sarthak Bhatia and Mr. Sanil Garg, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 6836/2019 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 285(for interim relief) 28535/2019 (for exemption) MEENU JAIN Through: Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN VIKAS SADAN ..... Respondent W.P.(C) Nos. 6842/2019, 6818/2019, 6836/2019 & 6981/2019 Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 6981/...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.resham Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:05. 07.2019 FAO3662014 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant RESHAM SINGH & ANR. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates appeared in this case: For the Appellant: For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI Ms. Shanta Devi Raman & Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocates. Mr. R.K. Nain, Adv. for R-1. NAJMI WAZIRI, J FAO3662014 & CM. Appl. 18957/2014 1. This appeal impugns an Award dated 21.08.2014 whereby the Employees Compensation Commissioner has directed payment of compensation to respondent no.1.2. Respondent no.1 had stated that he was employed by respondent no.2 Mr. Tilak Raj @ Kale, as a second driver, on the latters truck bearing No.HR-38-K-7145, which was insured with the appellant-insurance company. He claims to have met with an accident on 06.10.2010 during the course of his employment. He had claimed that on the said date while, on a business trip, when the vehicle reached near Bijapur...
Nabinagar Power Generating Company Limited vs.amr India Limited (Amril ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~19 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 248/2019 Date of Decision :5. h July, 2019 NABINAGAR POWER GENERATING COMPANY LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr.R.Sudhinder, Kaur, Mr.Viplav Acharya, Mr.Harshul Choudhary, Advs. Ms.Nimita versus AMR INDIA LIMITED (AMRIL, FORMERLY AMR CONSTRUCTION LTD) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Brijesh Kumar Goel, Mr.Rajeev Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IAs 8840-41/2019 Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. OMP(COMM.) 248/2019 & IA88392019 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 10.12.2018 and the order dated 21.02.2019 passed by the O.M.P. (COMM) No.248/2019 Page 1 Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the Site Levelling and Infrastructure packa...
Nitin Kumar Garg vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~7, 13, 14 and 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:05. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 6842/2019 and C.M. Appl. No.28545/2019 (for stay) NITIN KUMAR GARG ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lovish Sharma and Mr. Gobind Malhotra, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 6818/2019 ROMI GUPTA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sarthak Bhatia and Mr. Sanil Garg, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 6836/2019 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 285(for interim relief) 28535/2019 (for exemption) MEENU JAIN Through: Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN VIKAS SADAN ..... Respondent W.P.(C) Nos. 6842/2019, 6818/2019, 6836/2019 & 6981/2019 Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 6981/...
National Highways Authority of India vs.m/s Bhagheeratha Engineering L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO (OS) (COMM.) 148/2019 & CM294212019 (stay) + NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr Siddharth Pandey and Mr Gaurav Mishra, Advocates. M/S BHAGHEERATHA ENGINEERING LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through: Dr Amit George, Mr Amol Acharya, Mr Swaroop George and Ms Rajsree Ajay, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER0507.2019 1. This appeal by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is directed against the order dated 26th March, 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing NHAIs petition being OMP (COMM.) No.88/2019 under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenging an award dated 22nd October, 2018 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) adjudicating the disputes between the NHAI and the Respondent arising from an Agreement dated 15th June, 2001 for Four Laning of Km 180.000 to 199.200 of Bangalore-Salem-Madurai Section o...
Nitin Sharma & Ors. Vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 05, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3169/2019 & Crl.M.A. 13035/2019 NITIN SHARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anil Sharma, Mr. Aman Bhardwaj & Mr. Kunal Nath, Advocates STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Versus Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Rajbir Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.457/2015 under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 16th May, 2019 of respondent No.2/complainant and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that later on, offence under Section 354/354-B/5IPC has been added against petitioner No.4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for responde...
Patiala Kashmir Roadways Pvt. Ltd. Vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~7, 13, 14 and 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:05. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 6842/2019 and C.M. Appl. No.28545/2019 (for stay) NITIN KUMAR GARG ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lovish Sharma and Mr. Gobind Malhotra, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 6818/2019 ROMI GUPTA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sarthak Bhatia and Mr. Sanil Garg, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 6836/2019 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 285(for interim relief) 28535/2019 (for exemption) MEENU JAIN Through: Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN VIKAS SADAN ..... Respondent W.P.(C) Nos. 6842/2019, 6818/2019, 6836/2019 & 6981/2019 Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 6981/...
M/S Uem India Ltd vs.sunil Kumar Rajan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:5. h July, 2019 CM(M) 52/2019 M/S UEM INDIA LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Samir Malik & Mr.Paritosh Goel, Advocates versus SUNIL KUMAR RAJAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amarjit Singh, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % CM APPL. 28944/2019 (early hearing) For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for hearing. CM(M) 52/2019 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against an order dated 05.09.2018 by which the application of the plaintiff/respondent for amendment of the plaint was allowed.2. The suit in question was filed by the plaintiff against the petitioner/defendant claiming recovery of a sum of 51,00,000/- [Rupees Fifty One Lakhs]. with interest. It was contended that the CM(M) 52/2019 Page 1 of 7 plaintiff was an employee of the defendant and had dues against the de...
Gorkha Security Services vs.delhi Development Authority & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:05. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 6822/2019 GORKHA SECURITY SERVICES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.B. Upadhyay, Sr. Advocate and with Mr. Mahavir Rawat Mr.Nishant, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Shobhana Takiar and Ms. Shweta Anand, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGEMENT G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.28504/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6822/2019 and C.M. Appl. No.28503/2019 (for stay) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition relates to an online tender, which was invited through e-tendering on behalf of Delhi Development Authority (DDA), Sports Wing, for the work of providing security guards, watch and ward and security surveillance of Yamuna Sports Complex, DDA, Surajmal Vihar, Delhi.2. On 16th April, 2019, online t...
Romi Gupta & Anr vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~7, 13, 14 and 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:05. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 6842/2019 and C.M. Appl. No.28545/2019 (for stay) NITIN KUMAR GARG ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Lovish Sharma and Mr. Gobind Malhotra, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 6818/2019 ROMI GUPTA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sarthak Bhatia and Mr. Sanil Garg, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 6836/2019 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 285(for interim relief) 28535/2019 (for exemption) MEENU JAIN Through: Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN VIKAS SADAN ..... Respondent W.P.(C) Nos. 6842/2019, 6818/2019, 6836/2019 & 6981/2019 Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. Kush Sharma and Ms. Asiya Khan, Advocates for DDA. + W.P.(C) 6981/...
- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »