Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sushmita Sundaram vs.m/s Delta Airlines Inc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~20 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. 07.2019 LPA4292019 SUSHMITA SUNDARAM Through: Mr. T.V. George, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus M/S DELTA AIRLINES INC ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Mohna M. Lal and Ms. Geetali Talukdar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.29891/2019 (for exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.29892/2019 (for delay) 3. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 82 days in filing the appeal.4. For the reasons stated in the application the application is allowed and the delay is condoned.5. C.M. stands disposed of. LPA No.429/2019 Page 1 of 4 LPA4292019 6. The appellant is aggrieved by para 5 of the order dated 13.3.2019 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) 2031/2007.7. Learned counsel for the appellant while relying on the judgment of the Supre...
Ramesh Chander Singh & Ors vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~49 * + Date of Decision:8. 7.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.7187/2019 RAMESH CHANDER SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Rana Ranjit Singh, Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, Ms. Akanksha Singh, Mr. Avnish Kumar Gupta and Mr. Keshav Chaturvedi, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Mr. Jitendra Kr. Tripathi and Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM No.29925/2019 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C.) No.7187/2019 1. The petitioners assail the order dated 11.4.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench in O.A. 771/2016. The Tribunal has rejected the said original application preferred by the petitioners wherein they assailed their termination-discontinuation from services by the respondents, and they also sought a direction to the respondents ...
Inderjeet & Ors vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 08, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3214/2019 & CRL.M.As. 13233-13234/2019 INDERJEET & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prashant Prakash, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Satbir & W/SI Nisha. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.100/2017 under Sections 323/354B/34 of IPC, registered at Police Station Patel Nagar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 14th May, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondents No.2, who is present in Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Satbir, on the basis of identity proo...
Sarvjeet vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on:08. .07.2019 Judgment Reserved on:16. 04.2019 + CRL. A. 572/2011 SARVJEET ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Murari Tiwari, Ms. Ankita Tiwari Versus and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocates. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J:1. The present criminal appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment dated 26.02.2011 passed by the Court of Ld. Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (NDPS), West Delhi (ASJ) in Session Case No.50/2010 vide FIR No.25/2010 u/s 302/304B/498A IPC, PS Moti Nagar, convicting the appellant for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and order on sentence dated 28.02.2011 sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs.50,000/- and in default of fine, simple imprisonment for two months. The Ld. ASJ however, by the impugned judgment acqu...
Sonu vs.government of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~54 * + W.P.(C) 4697/2014, CM APPLs.28793 & 30243/2019 (stay) SONU GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for Through: Mr.Ritu Raj Biswas, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus L&B/LAC with Mr.Siddharth Panda and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates Ms.Padma Priya with Ms.Soumya Priyadarshinee, Advocates for NHAI. Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms.Nazia Praveen, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER0807.2019 1. The prayer in this writ petition is for quashing of the notification issued on 7th April 2006 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (LAA) and the consequential Award No.12/2008-09/SW dated 11th February 2009.2. The... Petitioner claims to be the owner, and in possession of land (ancestral land) bearing Khasra No.and area(4-14-0), 0/137(0-14-0), 0/13(3- W.P.(C) 4697/2014 Page 1 of 11 19-0), 0/13(1-15-0),(4-9-0), ...
Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs.bright Lifecare Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. h May, 2019 Date of decision :8. h July, 2019 + CS (OS) 550/2018 AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sohan Singh Rana, Mrs. Bindra Rana, Ms. Priya Adlaka, Ms. Tulip De & Mr. Ashish Sharma, Ms. Ruhee Advocates. (M:9818202368) Passi, versus BRIGHT LIFECARE PVT. LTD. & ANR. Through: Mr. Sagar Chandra, Ms. .....Defendants Ishani Chandra and Ms. Shubhie Wahi, Advocates for D-1 (M:8130910708) Mr. Sudarshan Rajan and Mr. Ramesh Rawat, D-2. (M:9990865829) Advocates for CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A. 14858/2018 (u/Order XXXIX Rules 1 and2) in CS(OS) 550/2018 1. A batch of seven suits viz. CS (OS) 410/2018, CS(OS) 453/2018, CS (OS) 480/2018, CS(OS) 531/2018, CS(OS) 550/2018, CS(OS) 75/2019 and CS(OS) 91/2019 having overlapping issues were heard by this Court from time to time. The interim application filed in this suit has been dispos...
Kailash Chand vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 492/2017 DHANESH THE STATE CRL.A. 628/2017 VIKRANT Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, ..... Appellant with Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Ms. Trishita Prasar and Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri WITH Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, ..... Appellant THE STATE with Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Ms. Trishita Prasar and Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri AND + CRL.A. 451/2018 KAILASH CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Tomar, Advocate versus Page 1 of 53 Crl.A.No.492/2017 & Ors. STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri. % Date of Decision:08. h July, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANG...
Mandeep Singh & Anr. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:8. h July, 2019 W.P.(CRL) 1828/2019 MANDEEP SINGH & ANR. ....... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.N.P.Singh with Mr.Shekhar Budakoti, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: Mr.Amanpreet Singh, proxy counsel .... Respondent MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for the State Insp. Om Prakash Lekhwal with SI Laxman Chaudhary, PS Hauz Khas Crl.M.A13248/2019 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(CRL) 1828/2019 & Crl.M.A. 13247/2019 (stay) 1. By this petition the petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 11th July, 2014 and 6th August, 2014 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate wherein the learned Metropolitan Magistrate dismissed the application of the petitioner and passed the order on charge on the ground that the petitioners are not liable to be discharged for the reason a Head Constable has the power to conduct a raid under the Delhi Excise Act.2. Learned counsel for the petitione...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.kiran Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 637/2019, CM APPLs. 27996-97/2019 Judgment delivered on:05. 07.2019 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. KIRAN DEVI & ORS. versus Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) In this case the appellant impugns an award of compensation on the 1. ground that two documents have been produced by the claimants apropos the age of the victim. As per the voter identity card, his age would be 53 years; whereas as per the document issued by the UIDAI, it would be 56 years and the corresponding multipliers would be 9 & 11 respectively. It is the appellants case that the investigations have been carried out apropos both the cards and they were found to be validly issued. It is the appellants case that the card issued by UIDAI should be taken into consideration because it specifically mentions his date of birth whereas the electoral card does not ...
Amit Ranjan vs.narcotic Control Bureau, Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2019
$~14 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h July, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 1102/2019 AMIT RANJAN Through: Mr. Ashok K. Singh & Mr. ........ Petitioner Sandeep Kumar, Advocates Versus NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU, DELHI ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.(ORAL) This order shall dispose of the application filed by the petitioner 1. under Section 438 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in complaint case SC No.81/2019 under Section 8 (C), 21(C), 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for grant of anticipatory bail.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the prosecution case are that on the basis of a secret information, two parcels, booked under Airways Bill Nos.2061262291 and 2061387436 and destined to USA and Canada respectively which were being sent by one Gaurav Mehta, were lying at DHL office and these parcels were suspected to contain narcotic psychotropic ...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »