Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sandeep Kumar vs.central Bureau of Narcotics
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * + % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 462/2016 & CRL.M.A.17384/2017 SANDEEP KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Akshay Bhandari, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT0807.2019 This appeal assails judgment, dated 3rd August, 2015, as well as order, dated 4th August, 2015, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ) has convicted the appellant for having committed the offences punishable under Section 21(c), and Section 23(c) read with Section 28 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act). The appellant stands sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment (RI) and a fine of 1 lakh, with default sentence of 6 months simple imprisonment (SI), for the offence under Section 21(c), and to 10 years RI and a fine of 1 lakh, with 6 months SI as default sentence, f...
Yash Raj Films Pvt Ltd vs.sri Sai Ganesh Prosductions & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1329/2016 YASH RAJ FILMS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Ms. Suveni Bhagat with Mr. Sajal Jain, Advocates. versus SRI SAI GANESH PROSDUCTIONS & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Yuganshu Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN02d May, 2019 Reserved on : Date of Decision:08. h July, 2019 JUDGMENT MANMOHAN,J1 The present suit has been filed for permanent injunction, rendition of accounts and damages. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"(i) Pass a decree permanently restraining and enjoining the Defendants, their servants, employees, representatives and agents, jointly and severally, from violating and infringing, in any manner, the copyrigyhts of the Planitiff comprised in and over the movie BAND BAAJA BAARAAT and from dubbing or releasing the movie JABARDASTH in any other language including Tamil, and from releasing the movie JABARDASTH on any other format including on DVDSs, VCDs Blu-r...
Mohd. Riazuddin vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 466/2004 Reserved on:03. 05.2019 Date of decision:08. 07.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: MOHD. RIAZUDDIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Mr. Rahul Keshav and Mr. Mahinder Partap Singh, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI... RESPONDENTThrough: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SI Pushpendra, PS: Bara Hindu Rao. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The appellant has preferred the present appeal against the judgment dated 27.03.2004 passed by the court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in SC No.4/099, arising from FIR No.172/1999, registered at Police Station: Bara Hindu Rao, whereunder he has been convicted under Section 302 IPC for having murdered his cousin, Mohd. Usman. Vide order on sentence dated 27.03.2004, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default thereof, suffer simple imprisonment for a perio...
V C vs.a C
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP(F.C.) 130/2016 & CM APPL. 31965/2016 Reserved on:30. 04.2019 Pronounced on:8. 07.2019 % V C A C ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Vikas Tiwari, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT JYOTI SINGH, J.1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant-wife seeking to set aside the judgment and decree dated 18.07.2016 passed by the learned Family Court, whereby the divorce petition filed by the husband, who is the respondent herein, has been allowed and the marriage between the parties has been dissolved on grounds of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as HMA).2. The necessary facts are that the respondent is a senior officer in the Indian Air Force and got married to the appellant herein on 29.01.2006 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies at New Delhi. A daughter was born out of...
The Deputy Commissioner of Police vs.score Information Technologies Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 1161/2012 Date of Decision :8. h July, 2019 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ramesh Singh, Standing counsel with Mr.Shlok Chandra, Ms.Roopali Wadhwan, Mr.Sharshvardhan Sharma, Advs. alongwith S.I.Manoj Kumar and ASI Devender. versus SCORE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES LTD Through: Mr.Tejas Karia, Mr.Ravjyot .... Respondent Ghuman and Ms.Amee Rana, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) This petition under Section 34 of 1. the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 04.06.2012 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the Supply Order dated O.M.P.1161/2012 Page 1 15.03.2007, placed by the petitioner on the respondent for Supply and Installation of CCTV system within the Walled City, Delhi.2. The primary disp...
Modicare Ltd. Vs.amazon Seller Services Private Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. h May, 2019 Date of decision :8. h July, 2019 + CS (OS) 75/2019 MODICARE LTD. ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Pooja Dodd, Mr. Saksham Dhingra, Mr. Vinay Tripathi, Ms. Aditi Menon and Mr. Aman Singhal, Advocates (M:9811945646) versus AMAZON SELLER SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Ms. Sneha Jain, Ms. Savni Dutt, Mr. Devvrat Joshi, Ms. Nilofar Absar and Mr. Abhijit Vachher, Advocates for Defendant No.1 (M:9810621272) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A.1733/2019 (u/Order XXXIX Rules 1 and2) in CS(OS) 75/2019 1. A batch of seven suits viz. CS (OS) 410/2018, CS(OS) 453/2018, CS (OS) 480/2018, CS(OS) 531/2018, CS(OS) 550/2018, CS(OS) 75/2019 and CS(OS) 91/2019 having overlapping issues were heard by this Court from time to time. The interim application filed in this suit has been disposed of vide a d...
Vishal Ahmad vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~48 * + Date of Decision:8. 07.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.7182/2019 VISHAL AHMAD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Mr. Yogesh Kuamr Mathur and Mr. Harkesh, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. Subhash Gosai and Mr. Amit Kr. Dogra and Mr. Tushar Malik, Advocates for R-1 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C.) No.7182/2019 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the orders dated 31.01.2019 and 18.4.2019 issued by the respondents. He also seeks a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners case, like others, who had been cleared despite having failed in one paper in the examination conducted by the respondents.2. The petitioner was appointed to the post of ASI/technical in the CRPF on 22.3.2017. After the petitioner cleared the initial written examination and training, he was sent for further t...
Manoj & Anr vs.gnct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 08, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3190/2019 & CRL.M.A. 13140/2019 MANOJ & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S.S. Rajore, Advocate. Versus GNCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Satish Singh Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.255/2009, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Mayur Vihar Phase-I, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement deed of 22nd December, 2018 (Annexure-C) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Satish Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 3190/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between t...
Trinity Touch Private Limited vs.svc Cooperative Bank Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h July, 2019 CS(COMM) 1021/2018 TRINITY TOUCH PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Aditi Mohan with Mr. Shidharth Mohan, Advs. SVC COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED Versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Adv. along CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW with A.R. The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.1,68,63,600/ along with pendente lite and future interest at 18% per annum, from the defendant bank.2. It is the case of the plaintiff in the plaint, (i) that the plaintiff, from time to time, for the purposes of its business, has been availing credit facility from various banks and financial institutions; (ii) that till January, 2016, the plaintiff was banking with the Indian Overseas Bank (IOB) and was availing various credit facilities therefrom, which were renewable on a year to year basis and were due for renewal in January, 2016; (iii) that sometime in June, 2015, the plaintiff ...
S G vs.r K G
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. 03.2019 Date of pronouncement:8. .07.2019 + MAT.APP(F.C.) 5/2018 S G R K G ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun Batta, Advocate versus Through: Ms. Vikas Jain, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.MAT. APP. (F.C.) 5/2018 1. The present appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 23.09.2017 passed by the Family Court in HMA No.7whereby the petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as HMA) filed by the respondent/husband for dissolution of marriage has been allowed and the marriage has been dissolved by a decree of divorce.2. The relevant facts necessary for the disposal of the present appeal are that the parties got married on 06.07.1989 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies at Shahjahanpur, U.P. Two sons were born out of the said wedlock on 09.08.1990 and 29.10.1992 respectively and are in the MAT.AP...
- ‹ Prev
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- Next ›
- Last »