Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs.1mg Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. h May, 2019 Date of decision :8. h July, 2019 + CS (OS) 410/2018 AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sohan Singh Rana, Mrs. Bindra Rana, Ms. Priya Adlakha, Ms. Tulip De & Mr. Ashish Sharma, Ms. Ruhee Advocates. (M:9818202368) Passi, 1MG TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. & ANR. versus Through: Mr. Sagar Chandra, Ms. .....Defendants Ishani Chandra and Ms. Shubhie Wahi, Advocates for D-1 (M:8130910708) Mr. Sudarshan Rajan and Mr. Ramesh Rawat, D-2. (M:9990865829) WITH Advocates for + CS (OS) 453/2018 AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sohan Singh Rana, Mrs. Bindra Rana, Ms. Priya Adlakha, Ms. Tulip De & Mr. Ashish Sharma, Ms. Ruhee Advocates. (M:9818202368) Passi, versus ADINATH ENTERPRISES & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Siddharth Batra, Ms. Garima CS (OS) 410/2018, 453/2018, 480/2018, 531/2018, 550/2018,...
Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs.flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. h May, 2019 Date of decision :8. h July, 2019 + CS (OS) 531/2018 AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ...Plaintiff Through: Ms. Priya Kumar, Mr. Shailabh Tiwari, Mr. C.D. Mulherkar, Mr. Tejas Chhabra, Mr. Chanakya Diwedi, Mr. Anand Chichra Advocates (9811155512) versus FLIPKART INTERNET PVT. LTD AND ORS. Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, .....Defendants Senior Advocate with Mr. Ankur Sangal, Ms. Sucheta Roy, Advocates for D-1 (M:9654592881) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A.14402/2018 (u/Order XXXIX Rules 1 and2) in CS(OS) 531/2018 1. A batch of seven suits viz. CS (OS) 410/2018, CS(OS) 453/2018, CS (OS) 480/2018, CS(OS) 531/2018, CS(OS) 550/2018, CS(OS) 75/2019 and CS(OS) 91/2019 having overlapping issues were heard by this Court from time to time. The interim application filed in this suit has been disposed of vide a detailed common judgment dated 8th July, 2019, in CS(OS) 410/2018. For detailed jud...
Vikrant vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 492/2017 DHANESH THE STATE CRL.A. 628/2017 VIKRANT Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, ..... Appellant with Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Ms. Trishita Prasar and Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri WITH Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, ..... Appellant THE STATE with Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Ms. Trishita Prasar and Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri AND + CRL.A. 451/2018 KAILASH CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Tomar, Advocate versus Page 1 of 53 Crl.A.No.492/2017 & Ors. STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri. % Date of Decision:08. h July, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANG...
Khem Karan Shukla vs.m/s Microtex India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~17 * % + W.P.(C) 11716/2016 KHEM KARAN SHUKLA Date of Decision:08. h July, 2019 ........ Petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Through: Mr.Mahavir Singh, Ms.Panchajanya B. Singh and Mr.Suresh Kumar Krilvanshi, Advocates along with petitioner in person versus M/S MICROTEX INDIA LTD Through: NEMO ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby 1. compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- has been awarded to the petitioner in lieu of reinstatement and back wages including litigation expenses. The petitioner seeks enhancement of the compensation amount.2. The petitioner joined as a Junior Master with the respondent in September, 1990; his services were regularised on 31st January, 1994; the management terminated him on 27th October, 2007 and his last drawn salary was Rs.11,100/- per month. The petitioner issued a demand notice dated 31st October, 2007 to the respondent seeking reinstatement. The p...
Mylan Laboratories Limited vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. h July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 5571/2019 & C.M. Appln. 24540/2019 & 26833/2019 1. MYLAN LABORATORIES LIMITED Through: Ms.Rajeshwari H., Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Gaurang Kanth, CGSC with Mr.Santosh Kr. Pandey, GP with Mr.N.K. Ramesh, Deputy Registrar, IPAB and Mr.S.S. Singh, Deputy Controller, Patents for R-1 & R-2 Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate (Amicus Curiae) Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate (Amicus Curiae) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the order dated 14th March, 2019 passed by the Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs whereby the Controller dismissed the pre-grant opposition filed by the petitioner and granted the patent to respondent No.3 in respect of Methods of Evaluating Peptide Mixtures.2. The Patents Act provides a remedy of an appeal to the petitioner against the impugned order dated 14th March, 2019 an...
Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs.adinath Enterprises & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. h May, 2019 Date of decision :8. h July, 2019 + CS (OS) 453/2018 AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sohan Singh Rana, Mrs. Bindra Rana, Ms. Priya Adlakha, Ms. Tulip De & Mr. Ashish Sharma, Ms. Ruhee Advocates. (M:9818202368) Passi, versus ADINATH ENTERPRISES & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Siddharth Batra, Ms. Garima Sehgal and Mr. Vishwajeet Arora, Advocates for D-2 & 3. Mr. Prateek Tewari, Advocate for D-8 (M-8800576518) Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Nitin Sharma, Mr. Sanjeev Seshadri & Ms. Disha Sharma, Advocates for D-9. (M:9810621272) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.CS(OS) 453/2018 and I.A. 124(for stay) and 146(u/O VII Rule 11 CPC) 1. A batch of seven suits viz. CS (OS) 410/2018, CS(OS) 453/2018, CS (OS) 480/2018, CS(OS) 531/2018, CS(OS) 550/2018, CS(OS) 75/2019 and CS(OS) 91/2019 having overlapping issu...
Saroj Saini & Anr. Vs.dharam Pal & Ors (The National Insurance Company ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAC.APP. 240/2018, CM APPL. 53728/2018 Judgment delivered on:08. 07.2019 SAROJ SAINI & ANR Through: Mr.Mukesh Gupta and Mr.Rishi Pal Singh, Advocates ..... Appellant DHARAM PAL & ORS (THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LIMITED) versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.J.P. N. Shahi, Advocate respondent no.3/ insurance company. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) The appellants have impugned the award of compensation primarily on two grounds: first a wrong multiplier of 11 instead of 17 was applied for the deceased, who was only 26 years of age. As per the schedule, it is not in dispute that the applicable multiplier would be 17 and not 11. Secondly, on the basis of Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp. & Anr1, no compensation towards loss of future prospects have been granted. However, in view of the decision of Supreme Court in National Insurance Company 1 (2009) 6 SCC121 MAC.APP. 240/2018 Page 1 of 2 Vs. Pranay ...
Shahi Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs.qayum Ahmed
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. h July, 2019 Through: Mr.Deepak Thukral, Advocate ........ Petitioner SHAHI EXPORTS PVT. LTD. + W.P.(C) 11500/2018 & CM APPL.44464/2018 versus QAYUM AHMED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajat Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- has been awarded to the respondent in lieu of reinstatement.2. The petitioner terminated the respondent on 04th April, 2008 after conducting an enquiry into the charge sheet dated 08th January, 2008. The learned Labour Court held that the enquiry was vitiated on account of the violation of the principles of natural justice. The learned Labour Court held that the reinstatement was not justified considering that both the parties have lost interest against each other. The learned Labour Court awarded compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- to the respondent.3. Learned counse...
Yogender & Ors. Vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~53. * + % W.P.(C.) No.2007/2017 YOGENDER & ORS IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. 07.2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj and Mr. Virendra Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gigi C. George, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition seeking the following substantive reliefs: (i) To quash and set aside the impugned advertisement dated October- November 2016 (P-1) and direct the respondents to consider the claim of... Petitioners for appointment to the post of Constable/ Driver as per their merit against the vacancies notified vide aforesaid impugned advertisement with all consequential benefits. (ii) to declare the action of respondents in exceeding the reservation in appointment to the post of Constable/ Driver in CISF as illegal, arbitrary and unjustified and issue appropriate...
Kadhirvel vs.vinod Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 07.2019 Date of decision:08. 07.2019 + RFA4442018 & CM Nos. 21884/2018 (for stay) & 36998/2018 (for additional documents) KADHIRVEL Through: Mr. C.Mohan Rao with Mr. Lokesh ..... Appellant Kumar Sharma, Advs. versus VINOD KUMAR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajeshekhar Rao, Mr. Vinay Sharma and Mr. Raghav Kacker, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J JUDGMENT1 The present appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 assails judgment and order dated 12.02.218 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, South District, Saket Court, Delhi whereby the application filed by the appellant/defendant seeking leave to defend the summary suit preferred by the respondent/plaintiff has been rejected and, consequently, the suit of the respondent has been decreed for a sum of Rs.12 lakh with pendente lite interest at the rate of 12% per annum and future interest at the rate of 6% per annum. RFA No.444/...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »