Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satya Rani Bhatia & Ors vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
$~21 & 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5437/2014 SATYA RANI BHATIA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Ashish Kapur and Mr Anmol Kapur, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Manish Mohan, Standing Counsel with Ms Manisha Saroha, Advocate. AND + W.P.(C) 5438/2014 M/S ELDEE ENTERPRISES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Ashish Kapur and Mr Anmol Kapur, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Manish Mohan, Standing Counsel with Ms Manisha Saroha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0907.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petitions, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to the respondents to pay the enhanced lease rent for the occupation of the ground floor and the second floor of the property bearing No.2-A/3, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi known as Kundan Mention Building (hereafter the property). The petitioner in W.P.(C) 5438/2014 W.P.(C) 5437/2014 &...
Sanjay Dewan vs.licensing Authority and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
% IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:08. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 1353/2019 & CM Nos. 6174/2019, 12222/2019 & 14922/2019 SANJAY DEWAN ........ Petitioner Versus LICENSING AUTHORITY AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Anuroop P.S., Advocate : Mr Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Ms Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr Ishan Agrawal and Ms Shruti Gala, Advocates. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the order dated 16.01.2019 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Appellate Authority (Honble Lt Governor of Delhi), whereby the petitioners appeal captioned Sanjay Dewan v. Licensing Authority (Appeal No.43/2018) preferred against the order dated 23.05.2018 passed by respondent no.1 (Licensing Authority, Drug Control Department), under Rule 64 (3) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 (hereafter the ...
Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs.pioneering Products and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. h May, 2019 Date of decision :8. h July, 2019 + CS (OS) 480/2018 AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Priya Kumar, Mr. C.D. Mulherkar, Mr. Shailabh Tiwari, Mr. Tejas Chhabra and Mr. Chanakya Diwedi, Advocates (M:9716989180) versus PIONEERING PRODUCTS AND ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Prince Pawaiya, Ms. Prema Arora, Ms. Peri Surya Yashodhara and Mr. Karan Chopra, Advocates, GNP Legal, for Defendant no.3 (9549124005) Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Ms. Sneha Jain, Ms. Savni Dutt, Mr. Devvrat Joshi, Ms. Nilofar Absar and Ms. Abhiti Vachher, Advocates, for Defendant no.4. (9810621272) Ms. Amita Gupta, Advocate, for Defendant No.1 (9900064366) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A.13159/2018 (u/Order XXXIX Rules 1 and2) in CS(OS) 480/2018 1. A batch of seven suits viz. CS (OS) 410/2018, CS(OS) 453/201...
Dhanesh vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 492/2017 DHANESH THE STATE CRL.A. 628/2017 VIKRANT Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, ..... Appellant with Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Ms. Trishita Prasar and Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri WITH Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, ..... Appellant THE STATE with Mr. Kushank Sindhu, Ms. Trishita Prasar and Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri AND + CRL.A. 451/2018 KAILASH CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Tomar, Advocate versus Page 1 of 53 Crl.A.No.492/2017 & Ors. STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with Inspector Yuvraj Prasad and SI Amit Kumar, PS Kalyanpuri. % Date of Decision:08. h July, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANG...
Shahi Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs.anurag Sahni
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~33 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. h July, 2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Deepak Thukral, Advocate SHAHI EXPORTS PVT. LTD. + W.P.(C) 10880/2018 & CM APPL.42459-42460/2018 versus ANURAG SAHNI Through: Mr.Rajat Sharma, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court whereby compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- has been awarded to the respondent in lieu of reinstatement.2. The petitioner terminated the respondent on 04th April, 2008 after conducting an enquiry into the charge sheet dated 08th January, 2008. The learned Labour Court held that the enquiry was vitiated on account of the violation of the principles of natural justice. The learned Labour Court held that the reinstatement was not justified considering that both the parties have lost interest against each other. The learned Labour Court awarded compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- to the respondent.3. Learned...
State vs.khimji Bhai Jadeja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:05. 07.2019 Judgment delivered on:08. 07.2019 + CRL. REF12014 STATE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate (Amicus Curiae) with Mr. Aditya Vaibhav Singh, Mr. Prateek Bhalla, Ms. Mallika Chaddha and Mr. Siddharth S. Yadav, Advocates Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv with Mr. Kewal Singh, APP for State, Ms. Ruchi Jain, Sneh Suman and Shreya Sinha Adv. with SI Gulshan Yadav, ACP Virender Singh, EOW, Delhi Police versus KHIMJI BHAI JADEJA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kulish Tanwar, Advocate Mr. Satish K Sansi, Adv Complainant for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present is a reference received from the Learned Additional District & Sessions Judge- II, North- West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, CRL. REF12014 Page 1 of 60 Dr. Kamini Lau under Section 395 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C. for short). The questions of law fra...
Oriflame India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.dinender Jain & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. h May, 2019 Date of decision :8. h July, 2019 + CS (OS) 91/2019 ORIFLAME INDIA PVT. LTD. ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Mahesh B. Chhibber, Mr. Karan Chopra, Ms. Mehak Khanna & Mr. S.N. Thyagrajan, Advocates (M:9818430581) versus DINENDER JAIN & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Manav Kumar, Ms. Nupur & Mr. Sajal Jain Advocate for D-2 (M:9810233743) Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Ms. Sneha Jain, Ms. Savni Dutt, Mr. Devvrat Joshi, Ms. Nilofar Absar and Mr. Abhijit Vachher, Advocates for Defendant No.6 (M:9810621272) Mr. Waize Ali Noor (Central Govt. Pleader) for UOI (M:8527837602) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A.2238/2019 (u/Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC) in CS(OS) 91/2019 1. A batch of seven suits viz. CS (OS) 410/2018, CS(OS) 453/2018, CS (OS) 480/2018, CS(OS) 531/2018, CS(OS) 550/2018, CS(OS) 75/2019 and CS(OS) 91/2019 h...
Sh. Bharat Bhushan Sharma vs.allahabad Bank & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~47 * + Date of Decision:8. 07.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.7174/2019 SH. BHARAT BHUSHAN SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pranesh, Advocate. Versus ALLAHABAD BANK & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CM No.29856-57/2019 Exemptions allowed subject to just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C.) No.7174/2019 & CM No.29855/2019 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 19.3.2019 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No.397/2017, arising out of the S.A.No.64/2017 (DRT-II, Delhi). The petitioner was the successful bidder in the auction held at the behest of the respondent-Allahabad Bank under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 (also known as the SARFAESI Act). The petitioner g...
Jipta & Anr vs.state of Nct Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 08, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1031/2019 & CRL.M.A. 4147/2019 JIPTA & ANR Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, .....Petitioners Advocate. Versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor with SI Avesh Kumar Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.13/2017 under Sections 308/34/341 of IPC, registered at Police Station Seemapuri, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 20th February, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2 present in the Court, is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by SI Avesh Kumar, on the basis of identity proof produced by him. CRL.M.C. 10...
Manmohan Singh Narula & Anr vs.speaker, Lok Sabha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h July, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6886/2019 & CM APPL. 28645/2019 MANMOHAN SINGH NARULA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Manmohan Singh Narula versus SPEAKER, LOK SABHA Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % D.N.PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) JUDGMENT0807.2019 1. This writ petition has been preferred for the following prayers: (i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ to the respondents for issuing directions, orders or to frame a policy for appointment of Leader of Opposition of Lok Sabha; (ii) Or to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case. For such act of kindness, the petitioners shall as in duty bound, ever pray. 2. Having heard the petitioner in person and looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the petitioner is in search W.P.(C) 6886/...
- ‹ Prev
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›
- Last »