Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bmw India Private Limited vs.libra Automotives Private Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h May, 2019 Pronounced on:9. h July, 2019 + O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 25/2019 and I.A. 3027 of 2019 BMW INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Diwakar Maheshwari, Mr. Karun Mehta and Mr. Yugam Taneja, Advocates. LIBRA AUTOMOTIVES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Vinam Gupta and Mr. Arjit Oswal, Advocates. + O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 9/2019 and I.A. 4988 of 2019 BMW INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Diwakar Maheshwari, Mr. Karun Mehta and Mr. Yugam Taneja, Advocates. LIBRA AUTOMOTIVES PRIVATE LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinam Gupta and Mr. Arjit Oswal, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J.1. The present petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 9/2019 & O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 25/2019 Page 1 of 41 Act, 19...
Kirat Singh & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 988/2019 Date of Order: July 09, 2019 .....Petitioners KIRAT SINGH & ANR. Through: Mr. D. Singh, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional ........ RESPONDENTS Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Badlu Ram Ms. Archana Saxena, Mr. Deepak Vuttsya & Mr. Aditya Rathee, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.330/2013, under Sections 354/354D/5IPC, registered at Police Station Janak Puri, District West, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 28th January, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondents No.2, who is present in Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Crl...
Vimlendu Jha vs.anoop Kumar Mittal, Cmd, Nbcc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
$~12 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:09. h July, 2019 CONT.CAS(C) 480/2018, C.M.25898/2018 VIMLENDU JHA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Sakshi Banga and Mr.Mrigank Prabhakar, Advocates versus ANOOP KUMAR MITTAL, CMD, NBCC ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Pinaki Misra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Manoj Kumar Das, Ms.Geeta Das and Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner alleges willful violation and disobedience of an undertaking given to this Court on 25.06.2018.2. As per the petition, in the morning of 26.06.2018, the workers of NBCC were cutting down the trees in Netaji Nagar, in utter disregard, deliberate and willful disrespect of the order dated 25.06.2018 passed by this Court. It is also averred in the contempt petition that the petitioner was constraint to intervene and he attempted to stop the officials and workers of NBCC from felling trees. However, he could not st...
Purbasha Das & Ors vs.national Testing Agency & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P. (C) 6801/2019 Judgment reserved on:04. 07.2019 Date of decision :09. 07.2019 PURBASHA DAS & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Arvind Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vikas Kumar, Mr. Manish Paliwal, Ms. Malika, Mr. Ashutosh, Advocates. versus NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. T. Seema Dolo, Advocates. Singhadev, Ms. Mr. Amandeep Kaur, Ms. Baikthan Sangi Das, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Arunima Pal, Advocates. Mr. Rahella Khan with Jatin, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 6811/2019 & CM APPL. 28485/2019 RAM SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Shaurya Sahay and Mr. Tripathi, Mani Avijit Advocates. versus NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS WP (C) 6801-9811-6829-6877/2019 Page 1 of 22 Through Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Seema Dolo, Advocates. Mr. Bhagwan Swaroop Shukla with Mr. Sarvan Kumar Shukla, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 6829/2019 ANUSYA MOTSARA ........ Petitioner Through None for petitioner. v...
Upendra Rai vs.directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4. h July, 2019 Decided on:9. h July, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 249/2019 UPENDRA RAI ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sidharth Agarwal, Mr. Arjun Dewan, Mr. Arjun Mukherjee, Ms. Sowjhanya Shankaran, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC, Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Ms. Mallika Hiremath, Adv. with Mr. Surendra Malik, Deputy Director. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA Crl.M.A. 9456/2019 (addl. documents) Additional documents as placed on record by the petitioner being the application of the respondent before the Trial Court under Section 44 (1)(c) PMLA and the reply by the CBI are taken on record. Application is disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 249/2019 1. By way of the present bail application, petitioner Upendra Rai seeks regular bail in ECIR/03/HIU/2018 dated 9th May 2018 recorded by Enforcement Directorate, Delhi Zone under Sections 3/ 4 ...
Atlanta Limited vs.national Highways & Infrastructure Development Corp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h July, 2019 ATLANTA LIMITED CS(COMM) 1231/2018 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Mrs. Mahima C. Shroff & Ms. Sanjana Nangia, Advocates (M-9811032077) versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Amit Kumar Mishra, Mr. Gaurav Mahajan, Mr. Saksham Babbar & Ms. Parul Panthi, Advocates (M-8557077641) Ms. Shraddha, Advocate for D-2 (M- 9900558600) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 7959/2019 (for directions) 1. This is an application under order VIII Rule 1 read with Section 151 of CPC. The relief prayed in the application is that the written statement filed by the Defendant No.1 on 30th March, 2019 ought to be taken off the record and judgment should be pronounced against the Defendant.2. Perusal of the application shows that it is based on the averment that there was one wr...
Bmw India Financial Services Private Limited vs.libra Automotives Priv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h May, 2019 Pronounced on:9. h July, 2019 + O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 25/2019 and I.A. 3027 of 2019 BMW INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Diwakar Maheshwari, Mr. Karun Mehta and Mr. Yugam Taneja, Advocates. LIBRA AUTOMOTIVES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Vinam Gupta and Mr. Arjit Oswal, Advocates. + O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 9/2019 and I.A. 4988 of 2019 BMW INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Diwakar Maheshwari, Mr. Karun Mehta and Mr. Yugam Taneja, Advocates. LIBRA AUTOMOTIVES PRIVATE LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinam Gupta and Mr. Arjit Oswal, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J.1. The present petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 9/2019 & O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 25/2019 Page 1 of 41 Act, 19...
Sh. Vedant Gupta vs.indian Institute of Technology and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
$~78 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 7282/2019 & CM APPL. 30279-30280/2019 Date of Decision:09. 07.2019 SH. VEDANT GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. KR Chawla, Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Advs. versus INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arjun Mitra, Adv. with Prof. Dass. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM APPL. 30280/2019 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 7282/2019 & CM APPL. 30279/2019 1. The petitioner vide the present petition seeks directions to the respondent to allot to the petitioner a seat in IIT as per his all India rank in JEE (Advanced), 2019 and choices of institutes and courses exercised by him. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner having appeared in the JEE (Main), 2019 was also short-listed for the JEE (Advanced), W.P.(C) 7282/2019 Page 1 of 9 2019 and that thereafter participated in JEE (Advanced), 2019 vide registration no....
Space 4 Business Pvt Ltd vs.new Delhi Municipal Council Through Its Se ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:09. 07.2019 + W.P.(C) 6757/2019, C.M. Appl. No.28350/2019 (Stay) SPACE4BUSINESS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shyam Khetarpal, Advocate versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Grover, Standing Counsel with Ms. Noopur Singhal and Mr.Mishal Vij, advocate for NDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The respondent had invited an E-Tender on 29.05.2019 for bids from Contractors for executing the work of celebration of 5th International Day of Yoga of 2019 by providing a Video Wall System.2. As per one of the conditions of the Tender, the petitioner was to deposit Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) in the form of a Fixed Deposit Receipt/Demand Draft in the prescribed format at the Office of the Executive Engineer, NDMC, and post the deposit of the amount, the same was to be acknowledged by the Officer of the re...
Libra Automotives Private Limited vs.bmw India Private Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h May, 2019 Pronounced on:9th July, 2019 + ARB.P. 163/2019 LIBRA AUTOMOTIVES PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinam Gupta and Mr. Arjit Oswal, Advs. BMW INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Diwakar Maheshwari, Mr. Karun Mehta and Mr. Yugam Taneja, Advs. CORAM: JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J1 The present Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed seeking appointment of a sole Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes alleged to have arisen under the Agreements executed between the... Petitioner and Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Brief Background 2. The... Petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and has been engaged in the business of purchasing and selling BMW automobiles and associated products ("BMW Group products") under v...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »