Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Naresh Kumar Sodhi vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 10, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3132/2019 & CRL.M.A. 12889/2019 NARESH KUMAR SODHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahesh Khanna, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Rajbir Singh. Mr. Kaushal Chauhan, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.1369/2015, under Sections 323/354/506 of IPC, registered at Police Station Hari Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 29th June, 2019 of respondent No.2 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question, now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondents No.2, who is present in Court, is the complainant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by ASI Rajbir Singh, on the basis of identity p...
Sanjay Kumar & Anr vs.state of Nct Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 10, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3258/2019 & CRL.M.As. 13412-13413/2019 SANJAY KUMAR & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate (DHCLSC). Versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Anuj. Mr. Gaurav Kaushik, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.359/2008, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 18th September, 2018 (Annexure P-14) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Anuj on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 3258/2019 Page 1 of 3 Respondent No.2, present in the Cou...
Société Des Produits Nestlé, S a & Anr. Vs.kaira District Cooperati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2019
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement Reserved:24. h April, 2019 Judgement Pronounced:10. July, 2019 FAO (OS) (COMM) 34/2018 SOCIT DES PRODUITS NESTL, S A & ANR. ....... Petitioners Through : Mr.Hemant Singh, Ms.Mamta Rani Jha, Mr.Manish Kumar Mishra, Mr.Ankit Arvind, Ms.Akanksha Singh and Mr.Rohan Krishnan, Advocates versus KAIRA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Snehal Kakrania, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeal lays challenge to the interim order dated 05.12.2017 passed by a Single Judge of this Court on an application filed by the appellants in a suit filed for infringement of trade mark against the respondents whereby the ad interim order dated 30.05.2012 was made absolute. By the Order dated 30.05.2012, both the parties were directed to maintain status quo with respect to the use of the ...
Shristi Communication Network vs.technobile Systems Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2019
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7327/2019 & CM Nos. 30516/2019 & 30517/2019 SHRISTI COMMUNICATION NETWORK ....... Petitioner Through: Mr Vikram Singh, Ms Smita Singh and Ms Bhanu Pant, Advocates. versus TECHNOBILE SYSTEMS PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Raj Shekhar Rao, Ms M. Khanna, Mr Gaurav Sanswal and Ms Shivani Dham, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1007.2019 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning orders dated 11.01.2019 and 07.05.2019 passed by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (hereafter TDSAT). The said impugned orders are common orders passed in the batch of petitions preferred by respondent no.1 (hereafter TSPL), under Sections 14 and 14A of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (hereafter the TRAI Act). W.P.(C) 7327/2019 Page 1 of 11 2. By the impugned order dated 11.01.2019, TDSAT had listed the petitions filed by TSPL for final ...
M/S. Epcos Electronic Components s.a vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2019
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10417/2018 M/S. EPCOS ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS S.A ......Petitioner Through Mr.Kamal Sawhney with versus Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Advocates ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Dev P.Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Jatin Teotia, Advocates for Respondent No.1 Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate for Revenue UNION OF INDIA & ORS. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER1007.2019 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner which is a company incorporated in Spain has filed this petition challenging the legality of the order dated 22nd March, 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation-I) (Respondent No.2) dismissing the... Petitioners application under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act).2. In the said petition, the... Petitioner had prayed for necessary directions to the Assessing Officer (AO) to consider permitting the... Petitioner to revise its return of income for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-2015 and ...
Chanda Tiwari vs.directorate of Social Welfare and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2019
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. h July , 2019 + W.P.(C) 13732/2018 & CM APPLN.16095/2019 1. CHANDA TIWARI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sudhir Advocates Sharma, Ms.Shobana, versus DIRECTORATE OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND ANR....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Rhishhabh Jetley, Ms.Urvi Mohan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the award dated 18th July, 2018 whereby the Labour Court rejected the petitioners claim as stale.2. The petitioner was engaged as a House Aunty with the Directorate of Social Welfare from 25th March, 1996 to 10th March, 1998 on an honorarium of Rs.1,000/- per month. On 10th March, 1998, six mentally challenged children escaped from the cottages No.1 and 2 of Home for Mentally Retarded Children at Avantika Complex, Rohini, Sector-I, Delhi-110085, out of which four children were in the custody of the petitioner. The Deputy Director conducted an enquiry and ...
Ccl Lk @ Lkp vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. h July, 2019 CRL.REV.P. 985/2018 & Crl.M.A.47265/2018 CCL LK @ LKP STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Harsh Prabhakar and Mr.Anirudh Tanwar, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP with SI Rajpal, P.S.Khayala. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICESANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. 2. The present petition raises important question of law. The question of law that arises is as to whether under Section 19 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the JJ Act), once a preliminary assessment report has been received from the Juvenile Justice Board under Section 15 of the JJ Act, the Childrens Court is obliged to accept the report and proceed further for trial of the child as an adult or has to take a decision as to whether there is need for trial of the child as an adult or...
Nav Durga Adarsh Vidhalaya vs.directorate of Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :03.07.2019 Date of decision:09.07.2019 W.P.(C) 12950/2018 & CM APPL. 50240/2018 NAV DURGA ADARSH VIDHALAYA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil) GNCTD. Dr. M.P. Singh, DEO, Zone-13 along with Mr. Arvind Kr. Dte. of Education, GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.CM APPL. 50240/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 12950/2018 1. Vide the present W.P.(C)12950/2018, the petitioner Nav Durga Adarsh Vidhalaya seeks the grant of a writ directing the respondent to cancel the withdrawal of recognition of the petitioners school by setting aside the order of the Honble Lieutenant Governor dated W.P. (C) 12950/2018 Page 1 of 24 17.10.2018 and also seeks the setting aside of the order dated 07.08.2018 of the respondent/ Dire...
Cfsit, Inc. Vs.metenere Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
$~3 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:9. 7.2019 + O.M.P.(EFA)(COMM.) 6/2018 & I.A. No.10671/2018 CFSIT, INC. ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr. Raunak Dhillon with Mr. Tarun Agarwal, Advs. versus METENERE LIMITED ..... Judgment Debtor Through: Ms. Purti Marwaha with Mr. Akhil Koshy, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) O.M.P.(EFA)(COMM.) No.6/2018 1. This petition has been preferred under Section 46 read with Section 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as the 1996 Act) for enforcement of a foreign award dated 4.4.2018.2. Notice in this petition was issued on 10.8.2018 when directions were issued to the petitioner/decree holder to file the amended memo of parties. 2.1 Furthermore, the judgment debtor company was directed to file the list of its assets in Form 16A, Appendix E of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 2.2 On the returnable date, that is, 1.10.2018, the judgment debtor company ente...
Union of India vs.akshay Bipin
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2019
$~39 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:09. h July, 2019 LPA4282019 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC. versus AKSHAY BIPIN ..... Respondent CORAM: Through Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari with Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocates. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM Appl. 29866/2019 (exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CM Appl. 29867/2019 (delay in re-filing) 3. This is an application filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 38 days delay in re-filing the present LPA.4. Prayer made in the application is not opposed. The same is allowed. Delay of 38 days in re-filing the LPA is condoned.5. The application stands disposed of. CM Appl. 29864/2019 (delay in filing) 6. This is an application filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 172 days delay in filing the present LPA. LPA. 428/2019 Page 1 of 29 7. Mr. Soni,...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »