Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Seema Verma vs.the East End Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~28 * + Date of Decision:11. 7.2019 % W.P.(C) 12233/2016 SEEMA VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma, Advocate. versus THE EAST END COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshay Bhardwaj, Advocate for R Mr. S.K.Sharma and Mr. Vishal Thakre, Advocates for R-2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 16.10.2015 passed by the Financial Commissioner, Delhi in Revision Petition preferred by the petitioner being Case No 177/2010. The learned Financial Commissioner has rejected the revision petition preferred by the petitioner, which had been preferred by the petitioner under Section 116 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 to assail the order dated 16.03.2010 passed by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies. The Registrar of Cooperative ...
N P Ashley & Ors. Vs.the University of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + WP (C) 6715/2019 & CM APPL.28233/2019, CM APPL.28385/2019 Judgment reserved on :05. 07.2019 Date of decision :11. 07.2019 N P ASHLEY & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sunil J Mathews, Advocate versus THE UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal, Adv. for R-1. Mr. A. Mariarputham, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Roshan, Mr. Rahat Bansal, Advs. For R-2 & 3. Mr. Romy Chacko, Adv. for R Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Adv. for R CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioners vide this petition challenge the decision of the respondent nos.2 & 3 i.e. the Supreme Council of the St. Stephens College (hereinafter referred to as the College and the Governing Body & Society of the College through its Chairman, St. Stephens College, University Enclave, North Campus, New Delhi, vide which it WP (C) 6715/2019 Page 1 of 30 was reflected on the website of the Colleg...
Gautam Surajgarhia vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. 07.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: + BAIL APPLN. 1565/2019 and CRL.M.(BAIL) 1115/2019 DEEPIKA GUPTA ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Madhukar Pandey, Mr. Anirudh Mishra, Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Shubham Sharma, Mr. Pranesh Misra and Ms. Damanjit Kaur, Advocates. versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with SI Jyoti, PS Model Town. Mr. Manish S., Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate for complainant with complainant in person. ..... Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 1566/2019 and CRL.M.(BAIL) 1116/2019 SANJAY GUPTA ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Madhukar Pandey, Mr. Anirudh Mishra, Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Shubham Sharma, Mr. Pranesh Misra and Ms. Damanjit Kaur, Advocates. versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with SI Jyoti, PS Model Town. Mr. Manish S., Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate for complainant with complainant in person. ..... Respondent BAIL A...
Indian Institute of Management,lucknow vs.n. S. Associates Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2019
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 261/2019 INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT,LUCKNOW........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Saurabh Kumar, Mr. Anmol and Ms.Swikriti Singhania, Advs. N. S. ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M. Tarique Siddiqui, Ms. Reetika Gupta and Mr. Aamir Zaidi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER1107.2019 SANJEEV NARULA, J.: I.As. 9186-9187/2019 (Exemptions) 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. CAV6872019 2. Mr. M. Tarique Siddiqui, learned counsel for the Respondent has put in appearance. Accordingly, the caveat stands discharged. I.A. 9185/2019 (delay) 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing/re-filing the application is condoned and the application is disposed of. O.M.P. (COMM) 261/2019 & I.A. 9188/2019 (stay) 4. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation O.M.P. (COMM) 261/2019 Page 1 of 8 Act, 1996...
Baljeet Singh @ Shanky vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2019
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 07.2019 CRL.M.C. 5908/2018 BALJEET SINGH @ SHANKY STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent : Mr. Rakesh Pal Singh, Advocate with petitioner in person. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State SI Nitu Kumar, PS Geeta Colony. Respondent in person. : JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.94/2016, initially registered under Sections 354/354D/506/509 IPC and Section 12 POCSO, Police Station Geeta Colony. Charge has been framed by order dated 25.05.2017 under Sections 363/354/354D/506/509 IPC. No charge has been framed under Section 12 POCSO. Parties have settled their disputes.... Petitioner as well as respondent No.2 are the first cousin being 2.3. Crl.M.C.5908/2018 Page 1 of 3 children of two real brothers. The prosecutrix/victim on the ...
Deepika Gupta vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. 07.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: + BAIL APPLN. 1565/2019 and CRL.M.(BAIL) 1115/2019 DEEPIKA GUPTA ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Madhukar Pandey, Mr. Anirudh Mishra, Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Shubham Sharma, Mr. Pranesh Misra and Ms. Damanjit Kaur, Advocates. versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with SI Jyoti, PS Model Town. Mr. Manish S., Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate for complainant with complainant in person. ..... Respondent + BAIL APPLN. 1566/2019 and CRL.M.(BAIL) 1116/2019 SANJAY GUPTA ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Madhukar Pandey, Mr. Anirudh Mishra, Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Shubham Sharma, Mr. Pranesh Misra and Ms. Damanjit Kaur, Advocates. versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with SI Jyoti, PS Model Town. Mr. Manish S., Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate for complainant with complainant in person. ..... Respondent BAIL A...
Manoj Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 11, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 1132/2019 VISHAL STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate. ........ Petitioner Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Amit. Mr. Kuldeep, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.638/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC & Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 17th December, 2018 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Amit on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute CRL.M.C. 1132/2019 Page 1 of 3 between the parties ha...
Shri Raj Kumar Batra vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 10, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 3251/2019 SHRI RAJ KUMAR BATRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitender Vashisht, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Dirender Singh Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Mahesh Kumar, Guardian of Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 13381/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.A. 13382/2019 (delay in re-filing) There is delay of 147 days in re-filing the accompanying petition. Upon hearing, I find that averments made in the instant application provide sufficient cause to condone the delay occasioned. The application is allowed and the delay stands condoned. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3251/2019 Quashing of FIR No.172/2010, under Sections 498-A/34 of IPC, CRL.M.C. 3251/2019 Page 1 of 3 registered at Police Station Govind Puri, Delhi is sou...
Chand Mohammad vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 10, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 928/2019 & CRL.M.As. 3714-3715/2019 CHAND MOHAMMAD STATE & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohd. Parvez, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Ramesh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.82/2014, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 19th September, 2014. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Ramesh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved in terms of mediated settlement of 19th S...
Priyanka Shukla vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2019
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 7080/2019 % PRIYANKA SHUKLA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sneha Mukherjee, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr.Aakash Varma & Mr. Prajesh V.S., Advs. for UOI Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Adv. with Dr. K. Aparna Sharma, Obstetrician-Gynaecologist for AIIMS Dr. Jawahar Raja, ASC with Ms. Kritika Padode & Mr. Bhandari, Advs. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER (ORAL) 10.07.2019 1. This Writ Petition has been preffered with the following prayers: a. For a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order, directing the... RESPONDENTS to allow the... Petitioner to undergo Medical Termination of the Pregnancy. b. For a writ of declaration or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing section 3(2)(b) of The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 971 to the limited extent that it stipulates a ceiling of 20 weeks for W.P. (C) 7080/20...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »