Delhi Court July 2019 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gursharan Buggal vs.anil Kumar Dhingra & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2019
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. 07.2019 + CM(M) 181/2019 GURSHARAN BUGGAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Advocate. versus ANIL KUMAR DHINGRA & ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % CM APPL. 4832/2019 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 181/2019 & CM APPL. 4831/2019 1. The petitioner has challenged an order of the Trial Court dated 30.05.2019, by which her application under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter CPC) for impleadment in a suit has been dismissed.2. The suit was filed by the respondent no.1/plaintiff against the respondent nos. 2 to 5 for specific performance of an agreement dated 17.10.2012 in respect of the suit property. The petitioner herein is the sister- CM(M) 181/2019 Page 1 of 6 in-law of the defendants in the suit, being the widow of their deceased brother. She ...
Liyi Marli Noshi & Anr vs.azad Chandra Prakash Gautam & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2019
$~SB-1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. h July, 2019 CONT.CAS(CRL) 7/2014 LIYI MARLI NOSHI & ANR ........ Petitioners Through:... Petitioner no.1 in person. versus AZAD CHANDRA PRAKASH GAUTAM & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Mukul Gautam, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of India and Sections 15(2) read with Section 2(C) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for initiating contempt proceedings against the respondents.2. It is claimed that the respondents along with many others indulged in acts of assault and intimidation towards the petitioners, towards a victim of a molestation case as well as other people from North East India on 23.05.2014 when they had come to Tis Hazari Court in connection with the criminal case filed by the victim of molestation. The petitioner no.1 hails from Arunachal Pradesh is an Advocate by prof...
Manya Education Private Limited vs.amit Mathur & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2019
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h July, 2019. + CS(COMM) 210/2019 & I.A. 5846/2019, 5847/2019, 5848/2019 MANYA EDUCATION PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Chanakya Arora, Mr. Saurabh Batra & Mr. Abhishek, (M- 9999291467) Advocates versus AMIT MATHUR & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Prithvi Kapur, Mr. Shobit Nanda & Ms. Rabbani Singh, Advocates (M- 9717992258) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff - Manya Education Private Limited against Defendant No.l - Mr. Amit Mathur, Defendant No.2 - Mr. Salman Salim and Defendant No.3 - Sable Edtech Private Limited. The case of the Plaintiff is that Defendant No.l was employed as the COO (Chief Operating Officer) of the Plaintiff and Defendant No.2 was appointed as Business Development Head-Admissions of the Plaintiff.2. The Plaintiff is involved in the business of providing services to aspirants who seek ...
Sh. Naveen Gautam & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2019
$~16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"12th July, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 227/2019 SH. NAVEEN GAUTAM & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Anuradha Yadav, Adv. with petitioners in person. STATE & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Amit Dutt, PS Lajpat Nagar. Mr. Gautam Chakraverty, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 07.09.2005. From out of the said wedlock, a male child named Deepanshu took birth on 14.10.2008. The marriage ran into rough weather. The second respondent raised allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty and deprived of her stridhan, first information report (FIR) no.350/2013 having been registered on 21.10.2013 by police station Lajpat Nagar on her complaint involving offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), th...
Mrs. Hansa Sachdeva vs.mr. r.k. Thadhani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2019
$~OS-6 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 07.2019 CS(OS) 252/2017 MRS. HANSA SACHDEVA ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Arshdeep Singh, Mr.Akshat Gupta and Mr.Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advs. MR. R.K. THADHANI versus ..... Defendant Through Mr.Amit Jain and Ms.Monika Gupta, Advs. for D-2 & D-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) IA No.2282/2019 1. This application is filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment of the plaint. Present plaint is filed seeking a decree of perpetual/permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from in any manner dealing with, attempting to sell or otherwise dispose of, sell or otherwise dispose of or create any third party interests in the Servant Quarter Terrace demarcated in the siteplan forming a part of the Agreement arrived at between the parties before the Mediator. Other connected reliefs are also sought. A decree for a sum of Rs.5,89,32,250/-is also sought as compensa...
Shyam Singh vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~9 * + Date of Decision:11. 7.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.4988/2019 SHYAM SINGH Through: Mr. Vikash Kumar, Mr. Nikhil Yadav ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. and Mr. Jitesh Sharma, Advocates. .....Respondents Through: Mr. K.V.Sreemithun, Sr. Panel Counsel for R-1 with Mr. Amit Kumar, GP, for R-1, R-2, R-3 and R- 4 with Inspector Firoz Khan. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the termination order dated 29.9.2018 as well as the appellate order dated 2.4.2019 passed by the respondents. By the second order the petitioners appeal against his termination has been rejected.2. The petitioner states that he applied for the post of ASI in CISF which was advertised vide the recruitment notice No.F. No.3/1/2016-P&P-II. The petitioner states that he passed the examination in Paper I and Pap...
Kunal Berani & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3278/2019 KUNAL BERANI & ORS. Date of Order: July 11, 2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Surjit S.Mishra & Mr. S.Karan Versus Singh, Advocates THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Rajbir Ms. Surjeet Kaur, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A.30714/2019 There is delay of 29 days in re-filing the accompanying petition. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and delay is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3278/2019 & Crl.M.A. 30713/2019 Quashing of FIR No.211/2017, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Patel Nagar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement of 10th August, 2018 recorded before the Family Courts (West) and affidavit of 16th March, 2019 of respondent No.2/complainant and on the ground that the misunderstanding whic...
M/S Umaxe Projects Private Limited vs.air Force Naval Housing Board & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2019
$~26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 206/2019, I.A. 8617/2019 * + M/S UMAXE PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner AIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD & ANR. Through: Mr. Viplav Sharma, Adv. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nishant Kumar, Mr. Prashant Bhatnagar and Mr.Aditya Chaudhary, Advs. For R-1 Mr. V. K. Gupta, Adv. For R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER1107.2019 SANJEEV NARULA, J.:1. The present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 inter alia, seeks interim measures in the nature of restraining the Respondent No.1 from invoking/encashing the five bank guarantees for an amount of Rs. 3.76 crores. Brief factual background 2.... Petitioner is a large scale construction company. Respondent No.1 (Air Force Naval Housing Board, hereinafter AFNHB) is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. In or around 2010, Respondent No.1 invited tenders for construction of 430 Dwelling Uni...
Shyam Kapoor and Ors vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2019
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7259/2019 & CM APPL. 30229-30230/2019 SHYAM KAPOOR AND ORS. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yogesh Chhabra, Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjib Sen, Senior Advocate with Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for Nr.DMC with Mr. Sayan Ray, Mr. Soumo Palit, Ms. Shiva Pandey, Advocates for Nr.DMC. Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for GNCTD / R4, R5 & R6. with Insp. Krishan Kumar, TI/KBC Traffic Circle, SI Ram Tirath, Pairvi Officer, Traffic. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % ORDER1107.2019 W.P.(C) 7259/2019 & CM APPL. 30229/2019 1. The present petition has been filed by 13 petitioners praying inter alia for quashing a Circular dated 01.07.2019 issued by the respondent No.1/ North Delhi Municipal Corporation (in short Nr.DMC) stating inter alia that in view of the ongoing pedestrianisat...
State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur vs.shri s.k.talwar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2019
$~8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA4572014 STATE BANK OF BIKANER & JAIPUR Date of Judgment:11. 07.2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar Sangal, Mr. Siddharth Sangal, Ms. Nilanjani Tandon, Advocates versus SHRI S.K.TALWAR Through: Mr.Atul T.N., Mr. Devendra Verma, Mr. Nitish Ojha, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGMENT G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 13.05.2014, which arises out of an Award passed by the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court dated 29.05.2002.2. The respondent/workman was appointed in the appellant bank on 21.07.1973. The incident pertains to 05.07.1983, when he was posted as Officiating Head Cashier at Naraina Industrial Estate, Phase I Branch of the Bank. The respondent had withdrawn a sum of Rs.2,07,500/- from the vault at 10.05 AM for usual cash transactio...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »